Zusammenfassung
Hintergrund
In der Behandlung chronischer lumbaler Rückenschmerzen werden Übungen zur Kräftigung der rumpfstabilisierenden Muskulatur und zur Mobilisation des Rumpfes eingesetzt. Das Ziel dieser prospektiven randomisierten klinischen Pilotstudie war, die Wirksamkeit einer Trainingsmethode der segmentalen Beweglichkeit der Wirbelsäule mit einem Training der rumpfstabilisierenden Muskulatur hinsichtlich objektiver und subjektiver Outcomes bei Patienten mit chronischen lumbalen Rückenschmerzen zu vergleichen.
Methodik
Nach einer Per-Protocol-Analyse wurden die Daten von 27 Patienten mit chronischen lumbalen Rückenschmerzen, die einer von 2 Gruppen randomisiert zugeordnet wurden, ausgewertet. Die Interventionsgruppe (GM) führte ein Mobilisationstraining nach der BALLance-Methode®, die Vergleichsgruppe (GS) ein Training der rumpfstabilisierenden Muskulatur über einen Zeitraum von 4 Wochen mit anschließendem Heimübungsprogramm über weitere 4 Wochen durch. Zu 3 Zeitpunkten (Vorher, nach 4 Wochen, Follow-up nach 8 Wochen) wurden die Beweglichkeit, die Kraftausdauer der Rumpfmuskulatur, die schmerzbedingte Behinderung bei Aktivitäten im Alltag, sowie das Schmerzvermeidungsverhalten erhoben.
Ergebnisse
Im Mittel verbesserte nur die GS signifikant die Haltezeit im Unterarmstütz und Seitstütz über die Zeit (p < 0,001) mit signifikanten Unterschieden zur GM (p < 0,05). In der Mehrzahl der subjektiven Outcomes konnte innerhalb beider Gruppen eine signifikante Verbesserung festgestellt werden (p < 0,05). Zwischen den Gruppen bestanden dabei keine signifikanten Unterschiede.
Diskussion
Patienten mit chronischen lumbalen Rückenschmerzen scheinen in Bezug auf ihre Beschwerden im Alltag sowohl mit gezielten Mobilisationsübungen als auch mit Übungen zur Kräftigung der rumpfstabilisierenden Muskulatur behandelt werden zu können.
Abstract
Background
For the treatment of chronic low back pain (cLBP), both core stability and mobilization exercises were introduced. The aim of this prospective randomized clinical pilot study was to compare the efficacy of mobilization and core stability exercises with regard to objective and subjective outcome measures in patients with cLBP.
Method
After a per-protocol analysis, the data of 27 patients with cLBP, who were randomly allocated to one of the two groups, were analyzed. The intervention group (GM) performed mobilization exercises using the BALLance-Methode®, the control group (GS) carried out core stability exercises for 4 weeks, and continued the exercises for an additional 4 weeks at home. Flexibility, strength endurance of the core stabilizing muscles, pain-induced disability, and pain avoidance behavior were the objective and subjective outcomes that were measured before, 4 weeks after, and 8 weeks after the onset of the intervention. The significance of differences within and between groups was analyzed.
Results
During the observation period, only in the GS patients could maintain the prone-plank position and the side-plank position improvements over time (p < 0.001), with significant differences compared with the GM (p < 0.05). Within both groups significant improvements in the subjective outcome measures were found (p < 0.05). Therefore, no significant differences existed between the groups.
Conclusion
With regard to their daily complaints, patients with cLBP can be treated using standardized mobilization exercises in addition to core stability exercises.
Literatur
Airaksinen O, Brox JI, Cedraschi C et al (2006) Chapter 4. European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain. Eur Spine J 15(Suppl 2):192–300
Artus M, Van Der Windt DA, Jordan KP et al (2010) Low back pain symptoms show a similar pattern of improvement following a wide range of primary care treatments: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Rheumatology (Oxford) 49:2346–2356
Balague F, Mannion AF, Pellise F et al (2012) Non-specific low back pain. Lancet 379:482–491
Barr KP, Griggs M, Cadby T (2005) Lumbar stabilization: core concepts and current literature, Part 1. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 84:473–480
Bird SP, Tarpenning KM, Marino FE (2005) Designing resistance training programmes to enhance muscular fitness: a review of the acute programme variables. Sports Med 35:841–851
Ekedahl KH, Jonsson B, Frobell RB (2010) Validity of the fingertip-to-floor test and straight leg raising test in patients with acute and subacute low back pain: a comparison by sex and radicular pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 91:1243–1247
Ekstrom RA, Donatelli RA, Carp KC (2007) Electromyographic analysis of core trunk, hip, and thigh muscles during 9 rehabilitation exercises. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 37:754–762
Evans K, Refshauge KM, Adams R (2007) Trunk muscle endurance tests: reliability, and gender differences in athletes. J Sci Med Sport 10:447–455
Faulkner J, Parfitt G, Eston R (2008) The rating of perceived exertion during competitive running scales with time. Psychophysiology 45:977–985
Franca FR, Burke TN, Hanada ES et al (2010) Segmental stabilization and muscular strengthening in chronic low back pain: a comparative study. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 65:1013–1017
Freeman MD, Woodham MA, Woodham AW (2010) The role of the lumbar multifidus in chronic low back pain: a review. Phys Med Rehabil 2:142–146
Frost H, Lamb SE, Klaber Moffett JA et al (1998) A fitness programme for patients with chronic low back pain: 2‑year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Pain 75:273–279
Gatti R, Faccendini S, Tettamanti A et al (2011) Efficacy of trunk balance exercises for individuals with chronic low back pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 41:542–552
Grabara M, Szopa J (2015) Effects of hatha yoga exercises on spine flexibility in women over 50 years old. J Phys Ther Sci 27:361–365
Gregg CD, Mcintosh G, Hall H et al (2014) Prognostic factors associated with low back pain outcomes. J Prim Health Care 6:23–30
Hayden JA, Van Tulder MW, Malmivaara A et al (2005) Exercise therapy for treatment of non-specific low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD000335
Henchoz Y, Kai-Lik So A (2008) Exercise and nonspecific low back pain: a literature review. Joint Bone Spine 75:533–539
Henry JD, Crawford JR (2005) The short-form version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21): construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychol 44:227–239
Koes BW, Van Tulder MW, Ostelo R et al (2001) Clinical guidelines for the management of low back pain in primary care: an international comparison. Spine (phila Pa 1976) 26:2504–2513 (discussion 2513–2514)
Koumantakis GA, Watson PJ, Oldham JA (2005) Trunk muscle stabilization training plus general exercise versus general exercise only: randomized controlled trial of patients with recurrent low back pain. Phys Ther 85:209–225
Kuukkanen T, Malkia E (2000) Effects of a three-month therapeutic exercise programme on flexibility in subjects with low back pain. Physiother Res Int 5:46–61
Laird RA, Kent P, Keating JL (2012) Modifying patterns of movement in people with low back pain – does it help? A systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 13:169
Macdonald D, Moseley GL, Hodges PW (2009) Why do some patients keep hurting their back? Evidence of ongoing back muscle dysfunction during remission from recurrent back pain. Pain 142:183–188
Mannion AF, Junge A, Grob D et al (2006) Development of a German version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Part 2: sensitivity to change after spinal surgery. Eur Spine J 15:66–73
Moffett J, Mclean S (2006) The role of physiotherapy in the management of non-specific back pain and neck pain. Rheumatology (Oxford) 45:371–378
Monticone M, Baiardi P, Vanti C et al (2012) Responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index and the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire in Italian subjects with sub-acute and chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 21:122–129
Moon HJ, Choi KH, Kim DH et al (2013) Effect of lumbar stabilization and dynamic lumbar strengthening exercises in patients with chronic low back pain. Ann Rehabil Med 37:110–117
Moseley GL (2008) I can’t find it! Distorted body image and tactile dysfunction in patients with chronic back pain. Pain 140:239–243
Murtezani A, Hundozi H, Orovcanec N et al (2011) A comparison of high intensity aerobic exercise and passive modalities for the treatment of workers with chronic low back pain: a randomized, controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 47:359–366
O’Sullivan PB (2000) Lumbar segmental “instability”: clinical presentation and specific stabilizing exercise management. Man Ther 5:2–12
O’sullivan PB, Phyty GD, Twomey LT et al (1997) Evaluation of specific stabilizing exercise in the treatment of chronic low back pain with radiologic diagnosis of spondylolysis or spondylolisthesis. Spine (phila Pa 1976) 22:2959–2967
Okorodudu DO, Jumean MF, Montori VM et al (2010) Diagnostic performance of body mass index to identify obesity as defined by body adiposity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Obes (Lond) 34:791–799
Perret C, Poiraudeau S, Fermanian J et al (2001) Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the fingertip-to-floor test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 82:1566–1570
Pfingsten M, Kroner-Herwig B, Leibing E et al (2000) Validation of the german version of the fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire (FaBQ). Eur J Pain 4:259–266
Richardson CA, Jull GA (1995) Muscle control-pain control. What exercises would you prescribe? Man Ther 1:2–10
Roland M, Fairbank J (2000) The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Spine (phila Pa 1976) 25:3115–3124
Schafer A, Hall T, Muller G et al (2011) Outcomes differ between subgroups of patients with low back and leg pain following neural manual therapy: a prospective cohort study. Eur Spine J 20:482–490
Schellenberg KL, Lang JM, Chan KM et al (2007) A clinical tool for office assessment of lumbar spine stabilization endurance: prone and supine bridge maneuvers. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 86:380–386
Schleip R, Muller DG (2013) Training principles for fascial connective tissues: scientific foundation and suggested practical applications. J Bodyw Mov Ther 17:103–115
Schmidt CO, Kohlmann T (2005) What do we know about the symptoms of back pain? Epidemiological results on prevalence, incidence, progression and risk factors. Z Orthop Grenzgeb 143:292–298
Simpson AK, Cholewicki J, Grauer J (2006) Chronic low back pain. Curr Pain Headache Rep 10:431–436
Steele J, Bruce-Low S, Smith D (2015) A review of the clinical value of isolated lumbar extension resistance training for chronic low back pain. Phys Med Rehabil 7:169–187
Stratford PW, Binkley J, Solomon P et al (1996) Defining the minimum level of detectable change for the Roland-Morris questionnaire. Phys Ther 76:359–365 (discussion 366–368)
Taimela S, Kankaanpaa M, Luoto S (1999) The effect of lumbar fatigue on the ability to sense a change in lumbar position. A controlled study. Spine (phila Pa 1976) 24:1322–1327
Urquhart DM, Hodges PW (2005) Differential activity of regions of transversus abdominis during trunk rotation. Eur Spine J 14:393–400
Utter AC, Robertson RJ, Green JM et al (2004) Validation of the Adult OMNI Scale of perceived exertion for walking/running exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 36:1776–1780
Van Middelkoop M, Rubinstein SM, Kuijpers T et al (2011) A systematic review on the effectiveness of physical and rehabilitation interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain. Eur Spine J 20:19–39
Verbunt JA, Smeets RJ, Wittink HM (2010) Cause or effect? Deconditioning and chronic low back pain. Pain 149:428–430
Von Korff M, Ormel J, Keefe FJ et al (1992) Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain 50:133–149
Wiesinger GF, Nuhr M, Quittan M et al (1999) Cross-cultural adaptation of the Roland-Morris questionnaire for German-speaking patients with low back pain. Spine (phila Pa 1976) 24:1099–1103
Woolf AD, Pfleger B (2003) Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bull World Health Organ 81:646–656
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Interessenkonflikt
M. Alfuth und D. Cornely geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
Alle beteiligten Patienten nahmen freiwillig an der Studie teil und gaben nach Aufklärung schriftlich ihr Einverständnis. Alle hier beschriebenen Untersuchungen am Menschen wurden im Einklang mit nationalem Recht sowie gemäß der Deklaration von Helsinki von 1975 (in der aktuellen, überarbeiteten Fassung) durchgeführt. Ferner erhielten die Patienten beider Gruppen eine in der Praxis und Wissenschaft bereits erprobte Behandlungsmaßnahme, sodass hier keine ethischen Bedenken bestanden. Daher wurde auf die Vorlage eines Antrags zur ethischen Prüfung des Vorhabens bei einer Ethikkommission verzichtet.
Alle Patienten, die über Bildmaterial oder anderweitige Angaben innerhalb des Manuskripts zu identifizieren sind, haben hierzu ihre schriftliche Einwilligung gegeben.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alfuth, M., Cornely, D. Chronischer lumbaler Rückenschmerz. Orthopäde 45, 579–590 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-016-3233-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-016-3233-1