Abstract
Key message
Greatest potential, QTLs for hypoxia and waterlogging tolerance in soybean roots were detected using a new phenotypic evaluation method.
Abstract
Waterlogging is a major environmental stress limiting soybean yield in wet parts of the world. Root development is an important indicator of hypoxia tolerance in soybean. However, little is known about the genetic control of root development under hypoxia. This study was conducted to identify quantitative trait loci (QTLs) responsible for root development under hypoxia. Recombinant inbred lines (RILs) developed from a cross between a hypoxia-sensitive cultivar, Tachinagaha, and a tolerant landrace, Iyodaizu, were used. Seedlings were subjected to hypoxia, and root development was evaluated with the value change in root traits between after and before treatments. We found 230 polymorphic markers spanning 2519.2 cM distributed on all 20 chromosomes (Chrs.). Using these, we found 11 QTLs for root length (RL), root length development (RLD), root surface area (RSA), root surface area development (RSAD), root diameter (RD), and change in average root diameter (CARD) on Chrs. 11, 12, 13 and 14, and 7 QTLs for hypoxia tolerance of these root traits. These included QTLs for RLD and RSAD between markers Satt052 and Satt302 on Chr. 12, which are important markers of hypoxia tolerance in soybean; those QTLs were stable between 2 years. To validate the QTLs, we developed a near-isogenic line with the QTL region derived from Iyodaizu. The line performed well under both hypoxia and waterlogging, suggesting that the region contains one or more genes with large effects on root development. These findings may be useful for fine mapping and positional cloning of gene responsible for root development under hypoxia.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CARD:
-
Change in average root diameter
- Chr.:
-
Chromosome
- DAS:
-
Days after sowing
- HTI:
-
Hypoxia tolerance index
- LG:
-
Linkage group
- NIL:
-
Near-isogenic line
- QTL:
-
Quantitative trait loci
- RD:
-
Root diameter
- RDW:
-
Root dry weight
- RIL:
-
Recombinant inbred lines
- RL:
-
Root length
- RLD:
-
Root length development
- RSA:
-
Root surface area
- RSAD:
-
Root surface area development
- SDW:
-
Shoot dry weight
References
Araki H, Hossain MA, Takahashi A (2012) Waterlogging and hypoxia have permanent effects on wheat root growth and respiration. J Agron Crop Sci 198:264–275. doi:10.1111/j.1439-037X.2012.00510.x
Armstrong W (1980) Aeration in higher plants. Adv Bot Res 7:225–332
Armstrong W, Drew MC (2002) Root growth and metabolism under oxygen deficiency. In: Yoav W, Amram E, Uzi K (ed) Plant root: the hidden half 3rd edn. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, pp 729–761
Bacanamwo M, Purcell LC (1999) Soybean dry matter and N accumulation responses to flooding stress, N sources and hypoxia. J Exp Bot 50:689–696. doi:10.1093/jxb/50.334.689
Cho JW, Yamakawa T (2006) Effects on growth and seed yield of small soy bean cultivars of flooding conditions in paddy field. J Fac Agr Kyu Univ 52:189–193
Colmer TD (2003) Long-distance transport of gases in plants: a perspective on internal aeration and radial oxygen loss from roots. Plant Cell Environ 26:17–36. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.00846.x
Colmer TD, Voesenek LACJ (2009) Flooding tolerance: suites of plant traits in variable environments. Funct Plant Biol 36:665–681. doi:10.1071/FP09144
Cornelious BP, Chen P, Chen N, de Leon N, Shannon JG, Wang D (2005) Identification of QTLs underlying waterlogging tolerance in soybean. Mol Breed 16:103–112. doi:10.1007/s11032-005-5911-2
Drew MC (1992) Soil aeration and plant root metabolism. Soil Sci 154:259–268
Githiri SM, WananabeS, HaradaK, Takahashi R (2006) QTL analysis of flooding tolerance in soybean at an early vegetative growth stage. Plant Breed 125:613–618. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0523.2006.01291.x
Henshaw TL, Gilbert RA, Scholberg JMS, Sinclair TR (2007a) Soya bean (Glycine max L. Merr.) genotype response to early-season flooding: I. root and nodule development. J Agron Crop Sci 193:177–188. doi:10.1111/j.1439-037X.2007.00257.x
Henshaw TL, Gilbert RA, Scholberg JMS, Sinclair TR (2007b) Soya bean (Glycine max L. Merr.) genotype response to early-season flooding: II. Aboveground growth and biomass. J Agron Crop Sci 193:189–197. doi:10.1111/j.1439-037X.2007.00258.x
Hisano H, Sato S, Isobe S, Sasamoto S, Wada T, Matsuo A, Fujishiro T, Yamada M, Nakayama S, Nakamura Y, Watanabe S, Harada K, Tabata S (2007) Characterization of the soybean genome using EST-derived microsatellite markers. DNA Res 14:271–281. doi:10.1093/dnares/dsm025
Hossain MA, Uddin SN (2011) Mechanism of waterlogging tolerance in wheat: morphological and metabolic adaptations under hypoxia or anoxia. Aust J Crop Sci 5:1094–1101
Jitsuyama Y (2015) Morphological root responses of soybean to rhizosphere hypoxia reflect waterlogging tolerance. Can J Plant Sci 95:999–1005. doi:10.4141/CJPS-2014-370
Kaga A, Shimizu T, Watanabe S, Tsubokura Y, Katayose Y, Harada K, Vaughan DA, Tomooka N (2012) Evaluation of soybean germplasm conserved in NIAS genebank and development of mini core collections. Breed Sci 61:566–592. doi:10.1270/jsbbs.61.566
Kokubun M (2013) Genetic and cultural improvement of soybean for waterlogged conditions in Asia. Field Crops Res 152:3–7. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2012.09.022
Lander ES, Green P, Abrahamson J, Barlow, Daly MJ, Lincoln, Newberg LA (1987) MAPMAKER: an interactive computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations. Genomics 1:174–181. doi:10.1016/0888-7543(87)90010-3
Linkemer G, Board JE, Musgrave ME (1998) Waterlogging effects on growth and yield components in late-planted soybean. Crop Sci 38:1576–1584. doi:10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183X003800060028x
Mano Y, Omori F (2007) Breeding for flooding tolerant maize using “teosinte” as a germplasm resource. Plant Root 1: 17–21. doi:10.3117/plantroot.1.17
McNamara ST, Mitchell CA (1990) Adaptive stem and adventitious root responses of two tomato genotypes to flooding. Hort Sci 25(1):100–103
Murray MG, Thompson WF (1980) Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 8:4321–4325
Nguyen VT, Vuong TD, VanToai T, Lee JD, Wu X, Rouf Mian MA, Dorrance AE, Shannon JG, Nguyen HT (2012) Mapping of quantitative trait loci associated with resistance to Phytophthora sojae and flooding tolerance in soybean. Crop Sci 52:2481–2493. doi:10.2135/cropsci2011.09.0466
Oosterhuis DM, Scott HD, Hampton RE, Wullschleger SD (1990) Physiological responses of two soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr] cultivars to short-term flooding. Environ Exp Bot 30:85–92. doi:10.1016/0098-8472(90)90012-S
Pedó T, Koch F, Martinazzo EG, Villela FA, Aumonde TZ (2015) Physiological attributes, growth and expression of vigor in soybean seeds under soil waterlogging. Afr J Agric Res 10: 3791–3797. doi:10.5897/AJAR2015.9661
Reyna N, Cornelious B, Shannon JG, Sneller CH (2003) Evaluation of a QTL for waterlogging tolerance in southern soybean germplasm. Crop Sci 43 :2077–2082 .doi:10.2135/cropsci2003.2077
Rhine MD, Stevens G, Shannon G, Wrather A, Sleper D (2010) Yield and nutritional responses to waterlogging of soybean cultivars. Irrig Sci 28:135–142. doi:10.1007/s00271-009-0168-x
Rich S, Ludwig M, Colmer T (2012) Aquatic adventitious root development in partially and completely submerged wetland plants Cotula coronopifolia and Meionectes brownii. Ann Bot 110:405–414. doi:10.1093/aob/mcs051
Sakazono S, Nagata T, Matsuo R, Kajihara S, Watanabe M, Ishimoto M, Shimamura S, Harada K, Takahashi R, Mochizuki T (2014) Variation in root development response to flooding among 92 soybean lines during early growth stages. Plant Pro Sci 17:228–236. doi:10.1626/pps.17.228
Sallam A, Scott HD (1987) Effects of prolonged flooding on soybeans during early vegetative growth. Soil Sci 144:61–66
Sauter M (2013) Root responses to flooding. Curr Opin Plant Bol 16:282–286. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2013.03.013
Sayama T, Nakazaki T, Ishikawa G, Yagasaki K, Yamada N, Hirota N, Hirat K, Yoshikawa T, Saito H, Teraishi M, Okumoto Y, Tsukiyama T, Tanisaka T (2009) QTL analysis of seed-flooding tolerance in soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.). Plant Sci 176:514–521. doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.01.007
Shimamura S, Mochizuki T, Nada Y, Fukuyama M (2003) Formation and function of secondary aerenchyma in hypocotyl, roots and nodules of soybean (Glycine max) under flooded conditions. Plant Soil 251:351–359. doi:10.1023/A:1023036720537
Song QJ, Marek LF, Shoemaker RC, Lark KG, Concibido VC, Delannay X, Specht JE, Cregan PB (2004) A new integrated genetic linkage map of the soybean. Theor Appl Genet 109:122–128. doi:10.1007/s00122-004-1602-3
Souza TC, Castro EM, Magalhães PC, Alves ET, Pereira FJ (2012) Early characterization of maize plants in selection cycles under soil flooding. Plant Breed 131:439–501. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0523.2012.01973.x
Thomas AL, Guerreiro SMC, Sodek L (2005) Aerenchyma formation and recovery from hypoxia of the flooded root system of nodulated soybean. Ann Bot 96:1191–1198. doi:10.1093/aob/mci272
Trought MCT, Drew MC (1980) The development of waterlogging damage in wheat seedlings (Triticum aestivum L.) I. Shoot and root growth in relation to changes in the concentrations of dissolved gases and solutes in the soil. Plant Soil 54:77–94. doi:10.1007/BF02182001
Vandamme E, Pypers P, Smolders E, Merckx R (2016) Seed weight affects shoot and root growth among and within soybean genotypes beyond the seedling stage: implications for low P tolerance screening. Plant Soil 401:65–78. doi:10.1007/s11104-015-2564-8
VanToai TT, Beuerlein JE, Schmitthenner AF, Martin SKSt (1994) Genetic variability for flooding tolerance in soybeans. Crop Sci 34:1112–1115. doi:10.2135/cropsci1994.0011183X003400040051x
VanToai TT, Martin SKSt, Chase K, Boru G, Schnipke V, Schmitthennr AF, Lark KG (2001) Identification of a QTL associated with tolerance of soybean to soil waterlogging. Crop Sci 41:1247–1252. doi:10.2135/cropsci2001.4141247x
VanToai TT, Hoa TTC, Hue NTN, Nguyen HT, Shannon JG, Rahman MA (2010) Flooding tolerance of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] germplasm from Southeast Asia under field and screen-house environments. Open Agric J 4:38–46. doi:10.2174/1874331501004010038
Visser EJW, Colmer TD, Blom CWPM, Voesenek LACJ (2000) Changes in growth, porosity, and radial oxygen loss from adventitious roots of selected mono- and dicotyledonous wetland species with contrasting types of aerenchyma. Plant Cell Environ 23:1237–1245. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.2000.00628.x
Wang S, Baston CJ, Zeng ZB (2007) Windows QTL cartographer 2.5. Department of Statistics. North Carolina State University, Raleigh
Wiengweera A, Greenway H, Thomson CJ (1997) The use of agar nutrient solution to simulate lack of convection in waterlogging soils. Ann Bot 80:115–123. doi:10.1006/anbo.1996.0405
Yamane K, Iijima M (2016) Nodulation control of crack fertilization technique reduced the growth inhibition of soybean caused by short-term waterlogging at early vegetative stage. Plant Prot Sci 19(3):438–448. doi:10.1080/1343943X.2016.1164573
Yamauchi T, Abe F, Kawaguchi K, Oyanagi A, Nakazono M (2014) Adventitious roots of wheat seedlings that emerge in oxygen-deficient conditions have increased root diameters with highly developed lysigenous aerenchyma. Plant Signal Behav 9:e28506
Zaidi PH, Rafique S, Singh NN (2003) Response of maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes to excess soil moisture stress: morpho-physiological effects and basis of tolerance. Eur J Agron 19: 383–399
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan (Genomics-based Technology for Agricultural Improvement, SFC-1005).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Communicated by Brian Diers.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Van Nguyen, L., Takahashi, R., Githiri, S.M. et al. Mapping quantitative trait loci for root development under hypoxia conditions in soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.). Theor Appl Genet 130, 743–755 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-016-2847-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-016-2847-3