Skip to main content
Log in

Kombinationsbehandlung des BPS mit Tamsulosin und Finasterid

Literaturübersicht und Verordnungsdaten

Combined treatment of BPS with tamsulosin and finasteride

Literature review and prescription data

  • Übersichten
  • Published:
Der Urologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die Kombinationstherapie des benignen Prostatasyndroms (BPS) mit α1-Blockern und 5α-Reduktase (5AR)-Inhibitoren wird basierend auf zwei Leitstudien zu Doxazosin/Finasterid und Tamsulosin/Dutasterid für alle 10 in Deutschland möglichen Kombinationen (5-mal α1-Blocker und 2-mal 5AR-Inhibitoren) empfohlen. Da in der BPS-Therapie in Deutschland Tamsulosin und Finasterid überwiegen, wurde die Rolle der Kombination Tamsulosin/Finasterid sowie deren wissenschaftliche Grundlagen gemäß klinischen Studien untersucht. Eine pharmakoepidemiologische Hochrechnung basierend auf GKV-Rezepten der Apothekenrechenzentren ergibt eine starke Zunahme der Kombination Tamsulosin/Finasterid seit 2003. Diese macht heute als freie Kombination neben einem Präparat der fixen Kombination Tamsulosin/Dutasterid etwa 50 % aller α1-Blocker/5AR-Inhibitorkombinationen aus. Klinische Studien zu Tamsulosin/Finasterid wurden publiziert, einschließlich kontrollierter Studien des Vergleichs der Kombination mit den Monotherapien. Die Ergebnisse hinsichtlich Besserung von Symptomen des unteren Harntraktes (LUTS), maximalem Harnfluss (Qmax), Prostatavolumen (PV) und prostataspezifischem Antigen (PSA) sowie Nebenwirkungen und Arzneimittelsicherheit stimmen mit den Ergebnissen der Leitstudien überein. Zufällige Ergebnisse können jedoch aufgrund von Mängeln des Studiendesigns nicht ausgeschlossen werden. Ein zuverlässiger Vergleich des Risikos von Progression unter Tamsulosin/Finasterid gegenüber den Monotherapien fehlt vollständig. Aufgrund der großen Kohärenz und kontinuierlichen Bewertung der verfügbaren Daten aller Kombinationen und mit dem anerkannt starken Klasseneffekt der Monotherapien scheint eine Fortsetzung der therapeutischen Praxis mit der Kombination Tamsulosin/Finasterid möglich zu sein.

Abstract

Combined therapy of benign prostatic syndrome (BPS) with α1-blockers and 5α-reductase (5AR)-inhibitors is recommended according to two leading studies on doxazosin/finasteride and tamsulosin/dutasteride for all 10 in Germany possible combinations (five α1-blockers and two 5AR inhibitors). Because tamsulosin and finasteride predominate in the treatment of BPS in Germany, the role of the combination tamsulosin/finasteride and its scientific basis from clinical studies has been investigated. A pharmacoepidemiological extrapolation from receipts of pharmacy data centres showed a strong increase of the combination tamsulosin/finasteride since 2003. As a free combination, tamsulosin/finasteride beside the fixed combination tamsulosin/dutasteride accounts to about 50% of all α1-blocker/5AR-inhibitor combinations today. Clinical studies on tamsulosin/finasteride have been published including controlled studies of the combination and both monotherapies. The results of improvement of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), prostate volume (PV) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as well as adverse events and drug safety are in agreement with the leading studies. However, results due to chance cannot be excluded because of deficiencies in study design. A reliable comparison of the risk of progression between tamsulosin/finasteride and both monotherapies is lacking completely. Because of the great coherence and continuous evaluation of available data of all combinations, and with the established strong class effect of monotherapies, a continuation of the therapeutic practice with the combination tamsulosin/finasteride is possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3

Literatur

  1. Cho SH, Lee SK (2003) The Experience with combination of finasteride and tamsulosin on benign prostatic hyperplasia. Korean J Urol 44:1110–1115

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chu N, Xu H, Wang G et al (2015) Pharmacokinetic interaction of finasteride with tamsulosin hydrochloride: an open-label, randomized, 3‑period crossover study in healthy Chinese male volunteers. Clin Ther 37:462–472

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Debruyne FM, Jardin A, Colloi D et al (1998) Sustained-release alfuzosin, finasteride and the combination of both in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. European ALFIN Study Group. Eur Urol 34:169–175

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gravas S, Bach T, Bachmann A et al (2016) EAU Guidelines on the management of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), incl. benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). In: European Association of Urology. http://uroweb.org/wp-content/uploads/EAU-Guidelines-Management-of-non-neurogenic-male-LUTS-2016.pdf. Zugegriffen: 11.Okt 2016

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hazlehurst JM, Oprescu AI, Nikolaou N et al (2016) Dual-5α-reductase inhibition promotes hepatic lipid accumulation in man. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 101:103–113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Höfner K, Bach T, Berges R et al (2014) S2e-Leitlinie der Deutschen Urologen: Therapie des benignen Prostatasyndroms. In: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Urologie. http://www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/043-035.html. Zugegriffen: 05. Apr 2016

    Google Scholar 

  7. Höfner K, Bach T, Berges R et al (2016) S2e-Leitlinie der Deutschen Urologen: Konservative und medikamentöse Therapie des benignen Prostatasyndroms. Urologe A 55:184–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hutchison A, Farmer R, Verhamme K et al (2007) The efficacy of drugs for the treatment of LUTS/BPH, a study in 6 European countries. Eur Urol 51:207–215

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Issa MM, Lin PJ, Eaddy MT et al (2008) Comparative analysis of alpha-blocker utilization in combination with 5‑alpha reductase inhibitors for enlarged prostate in a managed care setting among Medicare-aged men. Am J Manag Care 14:S160–S166

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaplan SA (2006) Update on the American Urological Association guidelines for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Rev Urol 8:S10–S17

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaplan SA (2012) Re: comparison of dutasteride and finasteride for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia: the Enlarged Prostate International Comparator Study (EPICS). J Urol 187:584–585

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaplan SA, Chung DE, Lee RK et al (2012) A 5-year retrospective analysis of 5alpha-reductase inhibitors in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia: finasteride has comparable urinary symptom efficacy and prostate volume reduction, but less sexual side effects and breast complications than dutasteride. Int J Clin Pract 66:1052–1055

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kirby RS, Roehrborn C, Boyle P et al (2003) Efficacy and tolerability of doxazosin and finasteride, alone or in combination, in treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: the Prospective European Doxazosin and Combination Therapy (PREDICT) trial. Urology 61:119–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee JY, Lee SH, Kim SJ et al (2011) Change in International Prostate Symptom storage subscore after long-term medical therapy in BPH patients: finasteride and alpha-blocker combination therapy in men with moderate-to-severe LUTS/BPH in Korea. Urology 77:171–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lepor H, Williford WO, Barry MJ et al (1996) The efficacy of terazosin, finasteride, or both in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Study Group. N Engl J Med 335:533–539

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Liaw YM, Kuo HC (2006) Discontinuation of an alpha-1 blocker or 5‑alpha-reductase inhibitor after combination medical treatment in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Tzu Chi Med J 18:91–96

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. McConnell JD, Roehrborn CG, Bautista OM et al (2003) The long-term effect of doxazosin, finasteride, and combination therapy on the clinical progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia. N Engl J Med 349:2387–2398

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. McVary KT, Roehrborn CG, Avins AL et al (2010) American Urological Association Guideline: Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH). In: American Urological Association. https://www.auanet.org/common/pdf/education/clinical-guidance/Benign-Prostatic-Hyperplasia.pdf. Zugegriffen: 05. Apr 2016

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mohanty NK, Singh UP, Sharma NK et al (2006) A comparative study of fixed dose of tamsulosin with finasteride vs tamsulosin with dutasteride in the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Indian J Urol 22:130–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mühlbauer B, Oßwald H (2012) Urologika. In: Schwabe U, Paffrath D (Hrsg) Arzneiverordnungsreport. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, S 923–936

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nickel JC, Barkin J, Koch C et al (2008) Finasteride monotherapy maintains stable lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia following cessation of alpha blockers. Can Urol Assoc J 2:16–21

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Nickel JC, Sander S, Moon TD (2008) A meta-analysis of the vascular-related safety profile and efficacy of alpha-adrenergic blockers for symptoms related to benign prostatic hyperplasia. Int J Clin Pract 62:1547–1559

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Nickel JC, Gilling P, Tammela TL et al (2011) Comparison of dutasteride and finasteride for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia: the Enlarged Prostate International Comparator Study (EPICS). BJU Int 108:388–394

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Roehrborn CG, Barkin J, Siami P et al (2011) Clinical outcomes after combined therapy with dutasteride plus tamsulosin or either monotherapy in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) by baseline characteristics: 4‑year results from the randomized, double-blind Combination of Avodart and Tamsulosin (CombAT) trial. BJU Int 107:946–954

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Shrestha BB, Karmacharya M (2015) Finasteride and tamsulosin combination in benign prostatic enlargement in a tertiary hospital. J Nepal Med Assoc 53:1–4

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Singh P (2007) Comparative study of therapeutic efficacy and safety of tamsulosin and finasteride, alone and combination, in mild moderate and severe cases of benign prostatic hyperplasia. In: Dissertation, A.P.S. University, Rewa (M.P.), Indien

  27. Singh P, Singh A, Shrivastava GP et al (2012) Study of therapeutic efficacy and safety of tamsulosin alone and combination with finasteride in benign prostatic hyperplasia patients. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 4:418–422

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Singh P, Indurkar M, Singh A et al (2013) Comparison of the efficacy and safety of tamsulosin (0.4 mg) v/s (and) finasteride for short-term treatment of patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. Int J Curr Pharm Res 5:24–28

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Stojanovic N, Bogdanovic D (2014) Improvement of sexual function in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia by pharmacologic therapy. Srp Arh Celok Lek 142:572–578

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Stojanovic N, Ignjatovic I, Djenic N et al (2015) Adverse effects of pharmacological therapy of benign prostatic hyperplasia on sexual function in men. Srp Arh Celok Lek 143:284–289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sun YH, Liu ZY, Zhang ZS et al (2011) Long-term efficacy and safety of tamsulosin hydrochloride for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia: data from China. Chin Med J (Engl) 124:56–60

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tkachuk VN, Al-Shukri SK, Tkachuk IN et al (2009) Efficacy and safety of combined treatment of prostatic adenoma with 5‑alpha reductase and alpha-adrenoblockers. Urologiia 6:25–27

    Google Scholar 

  33. Upreti R, Hughes KA, Livingstone DE et al (2014) 5α-reductase type 1 modulates insulin sensitivity in men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99:E1397–E1406

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Wu N, Sun J, Yu P et al (2012) Chinese urologists’ views of practice patterns in the diagnosis and treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a nationwide survey. Int Neurourol J 16:191–195

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Höfner.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

K. Höfner ist als Berater für die Firma Aristo Pharma tätig. S. Ulrich ist Mitarbeiter der Aristo Pharma GmbH, die urologische Arzneimittel entwickelt und vermarktet. R. Berges gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Höfner, K., Ulrich, S. & Berges, R. Kombinationsbehandlung des BPS mit Tamsulosin und Finasterid. Urologe 56, 645–653 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-016-0296-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-016-0296-x

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation