Skip to main content
Log in

Mit den Jungen fängt es an

Ausbildungskonzepte in der roboterassistierten Chirurgie

It starts with the novices

Training curricula for robot-assisted surgery

  • GeSRU
  • Published:
Der Urologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1

Literatur

  1. Anderson JE, Chang DC, Parsons JK, Talamini MA (2012) The first national examination of outcomes and trends in robotic surgery in the United States. J Am Coll Surg 215(1):107–116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Byrn JC, Hrabe JE, Charlton ME (2014) An initial experience with 85 consecutive robotic-assisted rectal dissections: improved operating times and lower costs with experience. Surg Endosc 28(11):3101–3107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Steinberg PL, Merguerian PA, Bihrle W III, Seigne JD (2008) The cost of learning robotic-assisted prostatectomy. Urology 72(5):1068–1072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ahmed K, Khan R, Mottrie A et al (2014) Development of a standardised training curriculum for robotic surgery: a consensus statement from an international multidisciplinary group of experts. BJU Int doi: 10.1111/bju.12974

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mirheydar H, Jones M, Koeneman KS, Sweet RM (2009) Robotic surgical education: a collaborative approach to training postgraduate urologists and endourology fellows. JSLS 13(3):287–292

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vlaovic PD, Sargent ER, Boker JR et al (2008) Immediate impact of an intensive one-week laparoscopy training program on laparoscopic skills among postgraduate urologists. JSLS 12(1):1–8

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Oderda M, Audenet F, Briganti A et al (2014) Pilot Validation Study of the European Association of Urology Robotic Training Curriculum. Eur Urol 65(6):89–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Volpe A, Ahmed K, Dasgupta P et al (2014) Pilot Validation Study of the European Association of Urology Robotic Training Curriculum. Eur Urol (in press). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.025

  9. Kumar R, Hemal AK (2006) The ‚scrubbed surgeon‘ in robotic surgery. World J Urol 24(2):144–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Guzzo TJ, Gonzalgo ML (2009) Robotic surgical training of the urologic oncologist. Urol Oncol 27(2):214–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Beyer B, Boehm K, Oppermann D et al (2014) PYJ16: an educational concept for bedside-surgeons for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 13(Suppl 3):12–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ruhotina N, Dagenais J, Gandaglia G et al (2014) The impact of resident involvement in minimally-invasive urologic oncology procedures. Can Urol Assoc J 8(9–10):334–340

Download references

Einhaltung ethischer Richtlinien

Interessenkonflikt. B. Beyer, K. Boehm, H. Borgmann und M. Janssen geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht. Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Beyer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beyer, B., Boehm, K., Borgmann, H. et al. Mit den Jungen fängt es an. Urologe 54, 259–260 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-015-3766-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-015-3766-7

Navigation