Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Soziale Medien – „do’s and don’ts“

Social media – do’s and don’ts

  • GeSRU
  • Published:
Der Urologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Chretien KC, Greysen SR, Chretien JP, Kind T (2009) Online posting of unprofessional content by medical students. JAMA 302(12):1309–1315. doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1387

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Greysen SR, Chretien KC, Kind T et al (2012) Physician violations of online professionalism and disciplinary actions: a national survey of state medical boards. JAMA 307(11):1141–1142. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.330

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bernhardt JM, Alber J, Gold RS (2014) A social media primer for professionals: digital dos and don’ts. Health Promot Pract 15(2):168–172. doi:10.1177/1524839913517235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. The Guardian (2014) Exec fired racist tweet aids africa apology. The Guardian, London. http://www.theguardian.com. Zugegriffen: 08.11.2014

  5. Decamp M (2012) Social media guidance, conflicts of interest, and health inequalities. Lancet 380(9840):472–473. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61290-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hartz T (2014) Social media in der Ärztlichen Praxis: Chancen, Risiken, Trends. Dtsch Arztebl 111(17)

  7. GMC (2014) Doctors use of social media. GMC, London. http://www.gmc-uk.org. Zugegriffen: 08.11.2014

  8. Mediasmarts (2014) Social media rules. Mediasmarts, Ottawa. http://mediasmarts.ca. Zugegriffen: 08.11.2014

  9. Nie DC, Zhang ZK, Zhou JL et al (2014) Information filtering on coupled social networks. PLoS One 9(7):e101675. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0101675

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Urologymatch (2014) Urologymatch, Washigton. http://www.urologymatch.com/. Zugegriffen: 08.11.2014

  11. Santana S, Lausen B, Bujnowska-Fedak M et al (2011) Informed citizen and empowered citizen in health: results from an European survey. BMC Fam Pract 12:20

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Einhaltung ethischer Richtlinien

Interessenkonflikt. H. Borgmann, C. Kalogirou, J. Salem und K. Probst geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht. Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Deutschland

    H. Borgmann

  2. Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland

    C. Kalogirou

  3. Abteilung für Urologie, St.-Josefs-Hospital, Dortmund, Deutschland

    J. Salem

  4. Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar, Deutschland

    K. Probst

Authors
  1. H. Borgmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. Kalogirou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. Salem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. K. Probst
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Borgmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Borgmann, H., Kalogirou, C., Salem, J. et al. Soziale Medien – „do’s and don’ts“. Urologe 54, 86–87 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-014-3733-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-014-3733-8

Search

Navigation