Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Direct evidence of hybodont shark predation on Late Jurassic ammonites

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Naturwissenschaften Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sharks are known to have been ammonoid predators, as indicated by analysis of bite marks or coprolite contents. However, body fossil associations attesting to this predator–prey relationship have never been described so far. Here, I report a unique finding from the Late Jurassic of western France: a complete specimen of the Kimmeridgian ammonite Orthaspidoceras bearing one tooth of the hybodont shark Planohybodus. Some possible tooth puncture marks are also observed. This is the first direct evidence of such a trophic link between these two major Mesozoic groups, allowing an accurate identification of both organisms. Although Planohybodus displays a tearing-type dentition generally assumed to have been especially adapted for large unshelled prey, our discovery clearly shows that this shark was also able to attack robust ammonites such as aspidoceratids. The direct evidence presented here provides new insights into the Mesozoic marine ecosystem food webs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Checa A, Martin-Ramos D (1989) Growth and function of spines in the Jurassic ammonite Aspidoceras. Palaeontology 32:645–655

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffin CJ (1997) The dentition of Hybodus hauffianus Fraas, 1895 (Toarcian, Early Jurassic). Stuttgarter Beitr Naturk B 256:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Fürsich FT, Oschmann W (1986) Storm shell beds of Nanogyra virgula in the Upper Jurassic of France. N Jb Geol Paläont Abh 172:141–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginter M, Ivanov A, Lebedev O (2005) The revision of “Cladodusoccidentalis, a late Palaeozoic ctenacanthiform shark. Acta Palaeontol Pol 50:623–631

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen MC, Mapes RH (1990) A predator-prey relationship between sharks and cephalopods in the Late Paleozoic. In: Boucot AJ (ed) Evolutionary paleobiology of behavior and coevolution. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 189–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Hantzpergue P (1989) Les ammonites kimméridgiennes du haut-fond d'Europe occidentale. Biochronologie, Systématique, Evolution, Paléobiogéographie. Cahiers de Paléontologie CNRS:1–428

  • Hantzpergue P (1995) Faunal trends and sea level changes: biogeographic patterns of Kimmeridgian ammonites of the Western European Shelf. Geol Rundsch 84:245–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt RA, Westermann GEG (1990) Mosasaur tooth marks on the ammonite Placenticeras from the Upper Cretaceous of Alberta, Canada. Can J Earth Sci 27:469–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman EG (1972) Ptychodus predation upon a Cretaceous Inoceramus. Palaeontology 15:439–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman EG (1990) Mosasaur predation on ammonites during the Cretaceous—an evolutionary history. In: Boucot AJ (ed) Evolutionary paleobiology of behavior and coevolution. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 184–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman EG (2004) Mosasaur predation on Upper Cretaceous nautiloids and ammonites from the United States Pacific coast. Palaios 19:96–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman EG, Kesling RV (1960) An Upper Cretaceous ammonite bitten by a mosasaur. Contr Mus Paleontol Univ Mich 15:193–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Kear BP (2006) First gut contents in a Cretaceous sea turtle. Biol Lett 2:113–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kriwet J, Witzmann F, Klug S, Heidtke UHJ (2008) First direct evidence of a vertebrate three-level trophic chain in the fossil record. Proc R Soc B 275:181–186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kröger B (2002) Antipredatory traits of the ammonoid shell—indications from Jurassic ammonoids with sublethal injuries. Paläontol Z 76:223–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy Z (2009) The possible trophic control on the construction and function of the aulacocerid and belemnoid guard and phragmocone. Rev Paléobiol 28:131–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Maisey JG, Carvalho MR (1997) A new look at old sharks. Nature 385:779–780

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mapes RH, Chaffin DT (2003) Predation on cephalopods: a general overview with a case study from the Upper Carboniferous of Texas. In: Kelley PH, Kowalewski M, Hansen TA (eds) Predator–prey interactions in the fossil record. Topics in geobiology 20. Kluwer/Plenum, New York, pp 177–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Mapes RH, Hansen MC (1984) Pennsylvanian shark–cephalopod predation: a case study. Lethaia 17:175–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mapes RH, Sims MS, Boardman DR II (1995) Predation on the Pennsylvanian ammonoid Gonioloboceras and its implications for allochthonous vs. autochthonous accumulations of goniatites and other ammonoids. J Paleontol 69:441–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Martill DM (1990) Predation on Kosmoceras by semionotid fish in the Middle Jurassic Lower Oxford Clay of England. Palaeontology 33:739–742

    Google Scholar 

  • Martire L, Torta S (2000) Pseudoborings in ammonite molds: the combined result of predation and taphonomic-reworking (Bajocian, Normandy, N. France). Palaios 15:356–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees J, Underwood CJ (2008) Hybodont sharks of the English Bathonian and Callovian (Middle Jurassic). Palaeontology 51:117–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood CJ (2002) Sharks, rays and a chimaeroid from the Kimmeridgian (Late Jurassic) of Ringstead, southern England. Palaeontology 45:297–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vullo R, Néraudeau D (2008) When the “primitive” shark Tribodus (Hybodontiformes) meets the “modern” ray Pseudohypolophus (Rajiformes): the unique co-occurrence of these two durophageous Cretaceous selachians in Charentes (SW France). Acta Geol Pol 58:249–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker SE, Brett CE (2002) Post-Paleozoic patterns in marine predation: was there a Mesozoic and Cenozoic marine predatory revolution? In: Kowalewski M, Kelley PH (eds) The fossil record of predation. The paleontological society papers 8. Paleontological Society, Pittsburgh, pp 119–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward P (1981) Shell sculpture as a defensive adaptation in ammonoids. Paleobiology 7:96–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitenack LB, Motta PJ (2010) Performance of shark teeth during puncture and draw: implications for the mechanics of cutting. Biol J Linn Soc 100:271–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author thanks B. and G. Vaubourg for having let access to the specimen for study and M. Ginter who kindly provided the photograph of the Glikmanius tooth. The comments and constructive remarks of J. Rees and an anonymous reviewer have greatly improved the quality of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Romain Vullo.

Additional information

Communicated by: Sven Thatje

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vullo, R. Direct evidence of hybodont shark predation on Late Jurassic ammonites. Naturwissenschaften 98, 545–549 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-011-0789-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-011-0789-9

Keywords

Navigation