Skip to main content
Log in

3D-navigiert-assistierte VBS®-Cage-Defektaugmentation eines tumorosteolytisch destruierten Beckens

Three-dimensional fluoroscopy-based navigation with the VBS® cage for defect augmentation of the pelvis due to metastatic tumor treated

  • Kasuistiken
  • Published:
Der Unfallchirurg Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die tumorosteolytische Destruktion des Sakrums, verursacht durch Metastasen, kann zu einer signifikanten Instabilität des hinteren Beckenrings führen. Die Folge sind Schmerzen, Immobilität und konsekutiv ein Verlust an Lebensqualität. Das Portfolio an operativen Möglichkeiten ist begrenzt. Vorgestellt wird eine neue 3D-navigiert-assistierte Technik der perkutanen Defektaugmentation des Beckenrings mit Hilfe eines expandierbaren und zementaugmentierten Cage als Stand-alone-Variante und in Kombination mit einer Osteosynthese.

Abstract

Destruction of the sacrum due to metastatic tumors may lead to a significant instability of the posterior pelvic ring. This often causes pain, immobility, and subsequently a loss of quality of life. The surgical treatment options are limited. A new technique is presented using a cement augmented expandable cage placed percutaneously using 3D fluoroscopy-based navigation with or without an additional osteosynthesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6

Literatur

  1. Barragán-Campos HM, Vallée JN, Lo D et al (2006) Percutaneous vertebroplasty for spinal metastases: complications. Radiology 238:354–362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Betts A (2009) Vertebroplasty of the first sacral vertebra. Pain Phys 12:651–657

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chip Routt ML, Simonian PT, Agnew SG, Mann FA (1996) Radiographic recognition of the sacral alar slope for optimal placement of iliosacral srews: a cadaveric and clinical study. J Orthop Trauma 10:171–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Frey ME, Depalma MJ, Cifu DX et al (2008) Percutaneous sacroplasty for osteoporotic sacral insufficiency fractures: a prospective, multicenter, observational pilot study. Spine 8:367–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Georgy BA (2009) Percutaneous cement augmentation of malignant lesions of the sacrum and pelvis. Am J Neuroradiol 30:1357–1359

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Grossterlinden L, Begemann PGC, Lehmann W et al (2009) Sacroplasty in a cadaveric trial: comparison of CT and fluoroscopic guidance with and without balloon assistance. Eur Spine J 18:1226–1233

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Grützner PA, Rose E, Vock B et al (2002) Computer-assistierte perkutane Verschraubung des hinteren Beckenrings. Unfallchirurg 105:254–260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoffmann RT, Jakobs TF, Trumm C et al (2008) Radiofrequency ablation in combination with osteoplasty in the treatment of painful metastatic bone disease. J Vasc Interv Radiol 19:419–425

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Morales Alba NA (2008) Posterior placement of an expandable cage for lumbar vertebral body replacement in oncologic surgery by posterior simple approach: technical note. Spine 33:E901–905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pommersheim W, Huang-Hellinger F, Baker M, Morris P (2003) Sacroplasty: a treatment for sacral insufficiency fractures. Am J Neuroradiol 24:1003–1007

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stöckle U, Krettek C, Pohlemann T, Messmer P (2004) Clinical application – pelvis. Injury 35: 46–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt für sich und seinen Koautor an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Rübberdt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rübberdt, A., Begemann, W. 3D-navigiert-assistierte VBS®-Cage-Defektaugmentation eines tumorosteolytisch destruierten Beckens. Unfallchirurg 116, 471–474 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-012-2214-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-012-2214-z

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation