Skip to main content
Log in

Ichthyosen

Pathophysiologische Modelle der epidermalen Differenzierung

The ichthyoses

Pathophysiological models of epidermal differentiation

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Hautarzt Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die Ichthyosen sind eine durch Schuppung oder Keratosen charakterisierte heterogene Krankheitsgruppe monogenetisch vererbter Verhornungsstörungen. In der Vergangenheit wurden sie aufgrund klinischer Zeichen und des Vererbungsmusters nosologisch eingeteilt. Als Folge des massiven Wissenssprunges im Gebiet der molekularen Genetik wurden nun zahlreiche Gendefekte im Gebiet der Ichthyosen aufgeklärt. Dadurch trat die Komplexität der Ichthyosen zutage, wobei ähnliche oder gleiche Phänotypen durch Mutationen in verschiedenen Genen verursacht werden können, währenddessen umgekehrt einzelne Gene in verschiedenen, zum Teil stark divergierenden Phänotypen resultieren können. Daher wurde eine neue Klassifizierung notwendig, die klinische und neue molekulargenetische Erkenntnisse berücksichtigt und vereint. In dieser Publikation folgen wir größtenteils der Einteilung, die anlässlich der ersten Ichthyosis Consensus Conference in Sorèze, Frankreich, festgelegt wurde.

Abstract

The ichthyoses are a heterogeneous group of monogenetically inherited disorders of cornification, and characterized clinically by scaling or hyperkeratosis. Historically, they were classified by clinical features and inheritance patterns. As a result of the recent molecular biological revolution, the ichthyoses are now recognized as comprising many diverse entities. Importantly, identical phenotypes may be caused by mutations in multiple genes, while mutations in a single gene may result in multiple and sometimes widely divergent phenotypes. The considerable complexity of this clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of disorders has prompted the need for a new classification. A classification that uses terminology based on a combination of the clinical and molecular genetic details, for instance loricrin keratoderma, is desirable. In this chapter we will use in principle the nosology adopted recently by an international group of experts at the First Ichthyosis Consensus Conference in Sorèz, France.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6
Abb. 7
Abb. 8
Abb. 9
Abb. 10
Abb. 11

Literatur

  1. Riecke E (1900) Über Ichthyiosis congenita. Arch Dermatol Syphilis 54:289–340

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brocq L (1902) Erythrodermie congenitale ichthyosiforme avec hyperepidermotrophie. Ann Dermatol Syph 4:1–31

    Google Scholar 

  3. Siemens H (1937) Dichtung und Wahrheit über die Ichthyosis bullosa, mit Bemerkungen zur Systematik der Epidermolysen. Arch Dermatol Syph 175:590–608

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wells RS, Kerr CB (1966) Clinical features of automal dominant and sex-linked ichthyosis in an English population. Br Med J 1:947–950

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Weibel ER, Schnyder UW (1966) On the ultrastructure and histochemistry of granular degeneration in vesicular ichthyosiform congenital erythrodermia. Arch Klin Exp Dermatol 227:341–342

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Frost P, Van Scott EJ (1966) Ichthyosiform dermatoses. Classification based on anatomic and biometric observations. Arch Dermatol 94:113–126

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Oji V, Tadini G, Traupe H et al (2010) Revised nomenclature and classification of inherited ichthyoses: results of the First Ichthyosis Consensus Conference in Sorèze 2009. J Am Acad Dermatol 63:607–641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hohl D, Williams M (2011) Mendelian disorders of cornification (MEDOC): The ichthyoses. In: Irvine A, Höger P, Yan A (Hrsg) Harper’s textbook of pediatric dermatology. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, S 121.121–121.170

  9. Smith FJ, Irvine AD, Terron-Kwiatkowski A et al (2006) Loss-of-function mutations in the gene encoding filaggrin cause ichthyosis vulgaris. Nat Genet 38:337–342

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mevorah B, Krayenbuhl A, Bovey EH, Melle GD van (1991) Autosomal dominant ichthyosis and X-linked ichthyosis. Comparison of their clinical and histological phenotypes. Acta Derm Venereol 71:431–434

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Irvine AD, McLean WH (2006) Breaking the (un)sound barrier: filaggrin is a major gene for atopic dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol 126:1200–1202

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sandilands A, Terron-Kwiatkowski A, Hull PR et al (2007) Comprehensive analysis of the gene encoding filaggrin uncovers prevalent and rare mutations in ichthyosis vulgaris and atopic eczema. Nat Genet 39:650–654

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Shapiro LJ, Weiss R, Buxman MM et al (1978) Enzymatic basis of typical X-linked ichtyosis. Lancet 2:756–757

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Paige DG, Emilion GG, Bouloux PM, Harper JI (1994) A clinical and genetic study of X-linked recessive ichthyosis and contiguous gene defects. Br J Dermatol 131:622–629

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hoyer H, Lykkesfeldt G, Ibsen HH, Brandrup F (1986) Ichthyosis of steroid sulphatase deficiency. Clinical study of 76 cases. Dermatologica 172:184–190

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Brookes KJ, Hawi Z, Kirley A et al (2008) Association of the steroid sulfatase (STS) gene with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 147B:1531–1535

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rothnagel JA, Dominey AM, Dempsey LD et al (1992) Mutations in the rod domains of keratins 1 and 10 in epidermolytic hyperkeratosis. Science 257:1128–1130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. DiGiovanna JJ, Bale SJ (1994) Clinical heterogeneity in epidermolytic hyperkeratosis. Arch Dermatol 130:1026–1035

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Traupe H, Kolde G, Hamm H, Happle R (1986) Ichthyosis bullosa of Siemens: a unique type of epidermolytic hyperkeratosis. J Am Acad Dermatol 14:1000–1005

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Arin MJ (2009) The molecular basis of human keratin disorders. Hum Genet 125:355–373

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mazereeuw-Hautier J, Aufenvenne K, Deraison C et al (2009)Acral self-healing collodion baby: report of a new clinical phenotype caused by a novel TGM1 mutation. Br J Dermatol 161:456–463

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Akiyama M, Sugiyama-Nakagiri Y, Sakai K et al (2005) Mutations in lipid transporter ABCA12 in harlequin ichthyosis and functional recovery by corrective gene transfer. J Clin Invest 115:1777–1784

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lefevre C, Audebert S, Jobard F et al (2003) Mutations in the transporter ABCA12 are associated with lamellar ichthyosis type 2. Hum Mol Genet 12:2369–2378

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Larregue M, Ottavy N, Bressieux JM, Lorette J (1986) Collodion baby: 32 new case reports. Ann Dermatol Venereol 113:773–785

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Huber M, Rettler I, Bernasconi K et al (1995) Mutations of keratinocyte transglutaminase in lamellar ichthyosis. Science 267:525–528

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Niemi KM, Kanerva L, Kuokkanen K (1991) Recessive ichthyosis congenita type II. Arch Dermatol Res 283:211–218

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Frenk E, Techtermann F de (1992) Self-healing collodion baby: evidence for autosomal recessive inheritance. Pediatr Dermatol 9:95–97

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Petit E, Huber M, Rochat A et al (1997) Three novel point mutations in the keratinocyte transglutaminase (TGK) gene in lamellar ichthyosis: significance for mutant transcript level, TGK immunodetection and activity. Eur J Hum Genet 5:218–228

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Jacyk WK (2005) Bathing-suit ichthyosis. A peculiar phenotype of lamellar ichthyosis in South African blacks. Eur J Dermatol 15:433–436

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Dahlqvist J, Klar J, Hausser I et al (2007) Congenital ichthyosis: mutations in ichthyin are associated with specific structural abnormalities in the granular layer of epidermis. J Med Genet 44:615–620

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Jobard F, Lefevre C, Karaduman A et al (2002) Lipoxygenase-3 (ALOXE3) and 12(R)-lipoxygenase (ALOX12B) are mutated in non-bullous congenital ichthyosiform erythroderma (NCIE) linked to chromosome 17p13.1. Hum Mol Genet 11:107–113

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Brash AR, Yu Z, Boeglin WE, Schneider C (2007) The hepoxilin connection in the epidermis. Febs J 274:3494–3502

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Eckl KM, Juanes S de, Kurtenbach J et al (2009) Molecular analysis of 250 patients with autosomal recessive congenital ichthyosis: evidence for mutation hotspots in ALOXE3 and allelic heterogeneity in ALOX12B. J Invest Dermatol 129:1421–1428

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Klar J, Schweiger M, Zimmerman R et al (2009) Mutations in the fatty acid transport protein 4 gene cause the ichthyosis prematurity syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 85:248–253

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Niemi KM, Kuokkanen K, Kanerva L, Ignatius J (1993) Recessive ichthyosis congenita type IV. Am J Dermatopathol 15:224–228

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Keine Angaben.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Hohl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hohl, D., Huber, M. Ichthyosen. Hautarzt 64, 12–21 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00105-012-2407-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00105-012-2407-y

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation