Zusammenfassung
Die perioperative Schmerztherapie mithilfe eines Periduralkatheters (PDK) stellt für viele Eingriffe ein Standardverfahren dar. Tritt unter liegendem PDK ein Zustand ein, der eine Antikoagulationstherapie erfordert, ist das Risiko einer epiduralen Blutung gegen das eines thrombembolischen Ereignisses abzuwägen. Im vorgestellten Fall eines perioperativen ST-Hebungsinfarkts, der mithilfe von „drug eluting stents“ (DES) therapiert wurde, konnten durch „bridging“ mit Tirofiban über 7 Tage planbare Bedingungen zur Entfernung des PDK geschaffen werden. Somit wurden beide Risiken „epidurales Hämatom“ vs. „Stent-Thrombose“ minimiert.
Abstract
Perioperative pain therapy using an epidural catheter is the standard operating procedure for numerous surgical interventions. The necessity of initiating anticoagulant therapy in a patient with an epidural catheter requires a careful weighing up between thromboembolic complications and epidural hematoma. The case presented here of a 47-year-old female patient who was operated on for mastectomy with a latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap demonstrates a possible solution to this dilemma. The patient sustained a perioperative ST elevation myocardial infarction treated with drug-eluting stents while undergoing epidural pain therapy. By using the short-acting antiplatelet drug tirofiban over a time period of 7 days the gap for dual antiplatelet therapy was reduced with the help of specific platelet aggregation assays to a time frame of a few hours to minimize the risk of stent thrombosis. The epidural catheter was removed without complications under consideration of the current recommendations for regional anesthesia and antithrombotic agents.
Literatur
De Luca G, Dirksen MT, Spaulding C et al (2012) Drug-eluting vs bare-metal stents in primary angioplasty: a pooled patient-level meta-analysis of randomized trials. Arch Intern Med 172:611–621
Task Force on the management of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)1, Steg PG, James SK, Atar D et al (2012) ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 33:2569–2619
Exadaktylos AK, Buggy DJ, Moriarty DC et al (2006) Can anesthetic technique for primary breast cancer surgery affect recurrence or metastasis? Anesthesiology 105:660–664
Gogarten W, Van Aken H, Buttner J et al (2007) Regional anaesthesia and thromboembolism prophylaxis/anticoagulation revised recommendations of the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine. Anaesth Intensivmed 48:S109–S124
Gogarten W, Vandermeulen E, Van Aken H et al (2010) Regional anaesthesia and antithrombotic agents: recommendations of the European Society of Anaesthesiology. Eur J Anaesthesiol 27:999–1015
Horlocker TT, Wedel DJ, Benzon H et al (2003) Regional anesthesia in the anticoagulated patient: defining the risks (the second ASRA Consensus Conference on Neuraxial Anesthesia and Anticoagulation). Reg Anesth Pain Med 28:172–197
Iakovou I, Schmidt T, Bonizzoni E et al (2005) Incidence, predictors, and outcome of thrombosis after successful implantation of drug-eluting stents. JAMA 293:2126–2130
Jambor C, Spannagl M, Zwissler B (2009) Perioperative management of patients with coronary stents in non-cardiac surgery. Anaesthesist 58:971–985
Limper U, Lynch J (2012) Removal of epidural catheter under dual antiplatelet therapy following acute coronary syndrome: scenario without special consideration to the current guidelines on epidural regional anesthesia. Anaesthesist 61(8):686–690
Mauri L, Hsieh WH, Massaro JM et al (2007) Stent thrombosis in randomized clinical trials of drug-eluting stents. N Engl J Med 356:1020–1029
Popescu WM, Gusberg RJ, Barash PG (2007) Epidural catheters and drug-eluting stents: a challenging relationship. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 21(5):701–703. (Epub 2007 Apr 16)
Schouten O, Domburg RT van, Bax JJ et al (2007) Noncardiac surgery after coronary stenting: early surgery and interruption of antiplatelet therapy are associated with an increase in major adverse cardiac events. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:122–124
Tank S, Gottschalk A, Radtke P et al (2006) Removal of an epidural catheter under ongoing antithrombotic therapy. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 41(4):274–277
Einhaltung ethischer Richtlinien
Interessenkonflikt. H. Böhle, J. Fröhlich, R. Laufenberg-Feldmann geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht. Der Beitrag enthält keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Böhle, H., Fröhlich, J. & Laufenberg-Feldmann, R. Risikoabwägung vor Periduralkatheterentfernung bei akutem Koronarsyndrom. Anaesthesist 63, 651–655 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-014-2358-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-014-2358-z