Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessment of elevated compartment pressures by pressure-related ultrasound: a cadaveric model

  • Review Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

There is a risk of misinterpreting the clinical signs of acute compartment syndrome of the lower limb resulting in delayed fasciotomy. Up to date, the diagnosis of compartment syndrome is based on clinical assessment and of invasive needle pressure measurement in uncertain cases. Close monitoring is necessary for early recognition of raising compartment pressures. Clinical assessment of muscle firmness by the physician’s palpation alone is unreliable. Thus, a device objectifying this assessment would be beneficial. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of muscle compartment elasticity measurements by a novel and non-invasive device using pressure-related ultrasound.

Methods

In a cadaveric model, the anterior tibial compartment was prepared to simulate raising intra-compartmental pressures (0–80 mmHg) by saline infusion. Standard invasive pressure monitoring was compared with a novel method to determine tissue elasticity. Changing cross-sectional view in B-mode ultrasound was exerted to measure the compartment depth before and after physician’s probe compression of 100 mmHg. Compartment displacement (∆d) was measured and related to the corresponding compartmental pressure (Spearman correlation coefficient). Delta (mm) of the control group at 10 mmHg compartment pressure was compared with measured data at rising compartmental pressures of 30, 50, and 70 mmHg using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. The intra-observer reliability (κ) was additionally calculated.

Results

Fresh and never frozen lower human limbs (n = 6) were used. The average displacement measured in the anterior tibial compartment was 2.7 mm (0.3–6.7 mm). A concordant consistent correlation between the compartmental displacement and the intra-compartmental pressure occurred. The Spearman coefficient (r s = 0.979) showed a significant correlation between the rising pressure and the decreasing tissue displacement visualized by ultrasound. The intra-observer value kappa showed reliable values (κ 10 = 0.73, κ 30 = 0.80, and κ 70 = 0.79).

Conclusions

We introduce a new method of ultrasound imaging enhanced with probe pressure measurement to determine changes of the visco-elastic behavior of isolated muscle compartments. Pressure-related ultrasound could be a reliable tool to determine the correlation between the measured compartmental displacement and the increasing intra-compartmental pressure. Its accuracy revealed promising results. This technique may help the physician to objectify the clinical assessment of compartment elasticity, mainly indicated in cases of unconscious patients and imminent pathology. Further clinical studies and improvements of this technique are required to prove its accuracy and reliability in cases of compartment syndrome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mubarak SJ, Hargens AR. Acute compartment syndromes. Surg Clin North Am. 1983;63:539–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Heckman MM, Whiteside TE Jr, Grewe SR, et al. Histologic determination of the ischemic threshold of muscle in the canine compartment syndrome model. J Orthop Trauma. 1993;7:199–210.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Finkelstein J, Hunter G, Hu R, et al. Lower limb compartment syndrome: course after delayed fasciotomy. J Trauma. 1996;40:342–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McQueen MM, Christie J, Court-Brown CM. Acute compartment syndrome in tibial diaphyseal fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78:95–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rorabeck CH. The treatment of compartment syndrome of the leg. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1984;66:93–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Oprel PP, Eversdijk MG, Vlot J, et al. The acute compartment syndrome of the lower leg: a difficult diagnosis? Open Orthop J. 2010;4:115–9.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Giannoudis PV, Nicolopoulos C, Dinopoulos H, et al. The impact of lower leg compartment syndrome on health related quality of life. Injury. 2002;33(2):117–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shuler FD, Dietz MJ. Physicians’ ability to manually detect isolated elevations in leg intracompartmental Pressure. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:361–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Prayson MJ, Chen JL, Hampers D, et al. Baseline compartment pressure measurements in isolated lower extremity fractures without clinical compartment syndrome. J Trauma. 2006;60:1037–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ulmer T. The clinical diagnosis of compartment syndrome of the lower leg: are clinical findings predictive of the disorder? J Orthop Trauma. 2002;16:572–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shadgan B, Menon M., O’Brien PJ, et al. Diagnostic techniques in acute compartment syndrome of the leg. J Orthop Trauma. 2008; 22:581–587.

  12. Al-Dadah OQ, Darrah C, Cooper A, et al. Continuous compartment pressure monitoring vs. clinical monitoring in tibial diaphyseal fractures. Injury. 2008;39:1204–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shadgan B, Menon M, Sanders D, et al. Current thinking about acute compartment syndrome of the lower extremity. Can J Surg. 2010;53:329–34.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ramana YV, Krishna GG, Khadeer MA. Shear velocity of muscle tissue. J Biomed Eng. 1980;2:211–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Aaron R, Huang M, Shiffman CA. Anisotropy of human muscle via non-invasive impedance measurements. Phys Med Biol. 1997;42:1245–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Murayama G, Nosaka K, Yoneda T, et al. Changes in stiffness of the human elbow flexor muscles after eccentric exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2000;82:361–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Arokoski JPA, Srakka J, Ojala T, et al. Feasibility of the use of a novel soft tissue stiffness meter. Physiol Meas. 2005;26:215–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Steinberg BD, Gelberman RH. Evaluation of limb compartments with suspected increased interstitial pressure. A non-invasive method for determining quantitative stiffness. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;300:248–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Steinberg BD. Evaluation of limb compartments with increased interstitial pressure. An improved noninvasive method for determining quantitative hardness. J Biomech. 2005;38:1629–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ophir J, C’espedes I, Ponnekanti H, et al. Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissue. Ultrason Imaging. 1991;13:111–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. C’espedes I, Ophir J, Ponnekanti H, et al. Elastography: elasticity imaging using ultrasound with application to muscle and breast in vivo. Ultrason Imaging. 1993;15:73–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gennisson JL, Cornu C, Cathline S, et al. Human muscle hardness assessment during incremental isometric contraction using transient elastography. J Biomech. 2005;38:1543–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kimura K, Watanabe Y, Umeda M, et al. Quantitative analysis of the relation between soft tissue stiffness palpated from the body surface and tissue hemodynamic in the human forearm. Physiol Meas. 2007;28:1495–505.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gershuni DH, Gosink BB, Hargens AR, et al. Ultrasound evaluation of the anterior musculofascial compartment of the leg following exercise. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1982;167:185–90.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This investigation and research project was supported by the START-Program of the faculty of medicine, RWTH Aachen University, Germany.

Conflict of interest

R. M. Sellei, S. J. Hingmann, C. Weber, S. Jeromin, F. Zimmermann, J. Turner, F. Hildebrand and H.-C. Pape disclose all possible conflicts of interest in the manuscript, including financial, consultant, institutional and other relationships that might lead to bias or a conflict of interest.

Ethical standards

This study has been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. The authors gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. M. Sellei.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sellei, R.M., Hingmann, S.J., Weber, C. et al. Assessment of elevated compartment pressures by pressure-related ultrasound: a cadaveric model. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 41, 639–645 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-014-0449-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-014-0449-9

Keywords

Navigation