Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Damage control strategies in the management of acute injury

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traumatic injury is the leading cause of death worldwide. The rapid evaluation and correction of injuries in these patients is paramount to preventing uncontrolled decompensation and death. Damage control strategies are a compendium of techniques refined over decades of surgical care that focus on the rapid correction of deranged physiology, control of contamination and blood loss, and resuscitation of critical patients. Damage control resuscitation (DCR) focuses on the replacement of lost blood volume in a manner mimicking whole blood, control of crystalloid administration, and permissive hypotension. Damage control laparotomy controls gastrointestinal contamination and bleeding in the operative suite, allowing rapid egress to the intensive care unit for ongoing resuscitation. Pelvic packing, an adjunct to DCR, provides a means to control hemorrhage from severe pelvic fractures. Temporary vascular shunts restore perfusion, while resuscitation and reconstruction are ongoing. Taken together, these strategies provide the trauma surgeon with a powerful arsenal to preserve life in the transition from injury to the shock trauma room to the intensive care unit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Injury prevention & control: worldwide injuries and violence. 2013. http://www.cdc.gov/injury/global/. Accessed 12 Dec 2013.

  2. Campion EM, Pritts TA, Dorlac WC, et al. Implementation of a military-derived damage-control resuscitation strategy in a civilian trauma center decreases acute hypoxia in massively transfused patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;75(2 Suppl 2):S221–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Savage SA, Zarzaur BL, Croce MA, et al. Redefining massive transfusion when every second counts. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;74(2):396–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dua A, Patel B, Kragh JF Jr, et al. Long-term follow-up and amputation-free survival in 497 casualties with combat-related vascular injuries and damage-control resuscitation. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(6):1517–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kauvar DS, Holcomb JB, Norris GC, et al. Fresh whole blood transfusion: a controversial military practice. J Trauma. 2006;61(1):181–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kutcher ME, Kornblith LZ, Narayan R, et al. A paradigm shift in trauma resuscitation: evaluation of evolving massive transfusion practices. JAMA Surg. 2013;148(9):834–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cotton BA, Reddy N, Hatch QM, et al. Damage control resuscitation is associated with a reduction in resuscitation volumes and improvement in survival in 390 damage control laparotomy patients. Ann Surg. 2011;254(4):598–605.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Duchesne JC, Hunt JP, Wahl G, et al. Review of current blood transfusions strategies in a mature level I trauma center: were we wrong for the last 60 years? J Trauma. 2008;65:272–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Holcomb JB, Wade CE, Michalek JE, et al. Increased plasma and platelet to red blood cell ratios improves outcome in 466 massively transfused civilian trauma patients. Ann Surg. 2008;248:447–58.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brown LM, Aro SO, Cohen MJ, et al. A high fresh frozen plasma: packed red blood cell transfusion ratio decreases mortality in all massively transfused trauma patients regardless of admission international normalized ratio. J Trauma. 2011;71(2 Suppl 3):S358–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pati S, Matijevic N, Doursout MF, et al. Protective effects of fresh frozen plasma on vascular endothelial permeability, coagulation, and resuscitation after hemorrhagic shock are time dependent and diminish between days 0 and 5 after thaw. J Trauma. 2010;69(Suppl 1):S55–63.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kozar RA, Peng Z, Zhang R, et al. Plasma restoration of endothelial glycocalyx in a rodent model of hemorrhagic shock. Anesth Analg. 2011;112(6):1289–95.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Eder AF, Herron R, Strupp A, et al. Transfusion-related acute lung injury surveillance (2003–2005) and the potential impact of the selective use of plasma from male donors in the American Red Cross. Transfusion. 2007;47:599–607.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chapman CE, Stainsby D, Jones H, et al. Ten years of hemovigilance reports of transfusion-related acute lung injury in the United Kingdom and the impact of preferential use of male donor plasma. Transfusion. 2009;49:440–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bickell WH, Wall MJ Jr, Pepe PE, et al. Immediate versus delayed fluid resuscitation for hypotensive patients with penetrating torso injuries. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:1105–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Morrison CA, Carrick MM, Norman MA, et al. Hypotensive resuscitation strategy reduces transfusion requirements and severe postoperative coagulopathy in trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock: preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial. J Trauma. 2011;70(3):652–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Alam HB, Velmahos GC. New trends in resuscitation. Curr Probl Surg. 2011;48:531–64.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ley EJ, Clond MA, Srour MK, et al. Emergency department crystalloid resuscitation of 1.5 L or more is associated with increased mortality in elderly and nonelderly trauma patients. J Trauma. 2011;70:398–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Makley AT, Goodman MD, Belizaire RM, et al. Damage control resuscitation decreases systemic inflammation after hemorrhage. J Surg Res. 2012;175:e75–82.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Schnüriger B, Inaba K, Wu T, et al. Crystalloids after primary colon resection and anastomosis at initial trauma laparotomy: excessive volumes are associated with anastomotic leakage. J Trauma. 2011;70:603–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Stone HH, Strom PR, Mullins RJ. Management of the major coagulopathy with onset during laparotomy. Ann Surg. 1983;197:532–5.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mohr AM, Asensio JA, García-Núñez LM, et al. Guidelines for the institution of damage control in trauma patients. ITACCS. 2005;Fall:1−5.

  23. Moore EE. Staged laparotomy for the hypothermia, acidosis, and coagulopathy syndrome. Am Surg. 1996;172(5):405–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sharp KW, Locicero RJ. Abdominal packing for surgically uncontrollable hemorrhage. Ann Surg. 1992;215:467–74.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cosgriff N, Moore EE, Sauaia A, et al. Predicting life-threatening coagulopathy in the massively transfused trauma patient: hypothermia and acidoses revisited. J Trauma. 1997;42:857–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Asensio JA, McDuffie L, Petrone P, et al. Reliable variables in the exsanguinated patient which indicate damage control and predict outcome. Am J Surg. 2001;182:743–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Burch JM, Ortiz VB, Richardson RJ, et al. Abbreviated laparotomy and planned reoperation for critically injured patients. Ann Surg. 1992;215:476–83.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Asensio JA, Petrone P, Roldán G, et al. Has evolution in awareness of guidelines for institution of damage control improved outcome in the management of the posttraumatic open abdomen? Arch Surg. 2004;139:209–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fabian TC. Damage control in trauma: laparotomy wound management acute to chronic. Surg Clin North Am. 2007;87:73–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cannon JW. Damage control: a balancing act. JAMA Surg. 2013;148(10):955.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bradley MJ, DuBose JJ, Scalea TM, et al. Independent predictors of enteric fistula and abdominal sepsis after damage control laparotomy: results from the prospective AAST open abdomen registry. JAMA Surg. 2013;148(10):947–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Boele van Hensbroek P, Wind J, Dijkgraaf MG, et al. Temporary closure of the open abdomen: a systematic review on delayed primary fascial closure in patients with an open abdomen. World J Surg. 2009;33(2):199–207.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Burlew CC, Moore EE, Smith WR, et al. Preperitoneal pelvic packing/external fixation with secondary angioembolization: optimal care for life-threatening hemorrhage from unstable pelvic fractures. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212:628–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Tai DKC, Li WH, Lee KY, et al. Retroperitoneal pelvic packing in the management of hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures: a Level I trauma center experience. J Trauma. 2011;71(4):E79–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tosounidis TI, Giannoudis PV. Pelvic fractures presenting with haemodynamic instability: treatment options and outcomes. Surgeon. 2013;11:344–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Pohlemann T, Gänsslen A, Bosch U, et al. The technique of packing for control of hemorrhage in complex pelvic fractures. Tech Orthop. 1994;9:267–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ertel W, Keel M, Eid K, et al. Control of severe hemorrhage using C-clamp and pelvic packing in multiply injured patients with pelvic ring disruption. J Orthop Trauma. 2001;15:468–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Sauaia A, Moore FA, Moore EE, et al. Epidemiology of trauma deaths: a reassessment. J Trauma. 1995;38(2):185–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Kragh JF Jr, Murphy C, Dubick MA, et al. New tourniquet device concepts for battlefield hemorrhage control. US Army Med Dep J. 2011;April–June:38−48.

  40. Rasmussen TE, DuBose JJ, Asensio JA, et al. Tourniquets, vascular shunts, and endovascular technologies: esoteric or essential? A report from the 2011 AAST Military Liaison Panel. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(1):282–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Hancock H, Rasmussen TE, Walker AJ, et al. History of temporary intravascular shunts in the management of vascular injury. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52(5):1405–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Rasmussen TE, Clouse WD, Jenkins DH, et al. The use of temporary vascular shunts as a damage control adjunct in the management of wartime vascular injury. J Trauma. 2006;61(1):8–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Subramanian A, Vercruysse G, Dente C, et al. A decade’s experience with temporary intravascular shunts at a civilian Level I Trauma Center. J Trauma. 2008;65(2):316–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Taller J, Kamdar JP, Greene JA, et al. Temporary vascular shunts as initial treatment of proximal extremity vascular injuries during combat operations: the new standard of care at Echelon II facilities? J Trauma. 2008;65(3):595–603.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Borut LT, Acosta CJ, Tadlock LC, et al. The use of temporary vascular shunts in military extremity wounds: a preliminary outcome analysis with 2-year follow-up. J Trauma. 2010;69(1):174–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Stannard A, Eliason JL, Rasmussen TE. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) as an adjunct for hemorrhagic shock. J Trauma. 2011;71(6):1869–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Martinelli T, Thony F, Decléty P, et al. Intra-aortic balloon occlusion to salvage patients with life-threatening hemorrhagic shocks from pelvic fractures. J Trauma. 2010;68(4):942–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. White JM, Cannon JW, Stannard A, et al. Endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta is superior to resuscitative thoracotomy with aortic clamping in a porcine model of hemorrhagic shock. Surgery. 2011;150(3):400–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest or financial support related to this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, 910 Madison Ave., Suite 220, Memphis, TN, 38163, USA

    S. A. Savage & T. C. Fabian

Authors
  1. S. A. Savage
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. C. Fabian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. A. Savage.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Savage, S.A., Fabian, T.C. Damage control strategies in the management of acute injury. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 40, 143–150 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-014-0386-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-014-0386-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation