Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Bildgeführte intensitätsmodulierte Strahlentherapie vermindert die gastrointestinalen Spätfolgen nach Radiotherapie des Prostatakarzinoms

Image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy decreases late gastrointestinal side effects after radiation therapy for prostate cancer

  • Literatur kommentiert
  • Published:
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Incrocci L, Wortel RC, Alemayehu WG et al (2016) Hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with localised prostate cancer (HYPRO): Final efficacy results from a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 17:1061–1069

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Peeters ST, Heemsbergen WD, Koper PC et al (2006) Dose-response in radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: Results of the dutch multicenter randomized phase iii trial comparing 68 gy of radiotherapy with 78 gy. J Clin Oncol 24:1990–1996

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zelefsky MJ, Levin EJ, Hunt M et al (2008) Incidence of late rectal and urinary toxicities after three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 70:1124–1129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Michalski JM, Yan Y, Watkins-Bruner D et al (2013) Preliminary toxicity analysis of 3‑dimensional conformal radiation therapy versus intensity modulated radiation therapy on the high-dose arm of the radiation therapy oncology group 0126 prostate cancer trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 87:932–938

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Luxton G, Hancock SL, Boyer AL (2004) Dosimetry and radiobiologic model comparison of imrt and 3 d conformal radiotherapy in treatment of carcinoma of the prostate. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 59:267–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bekelman JE, Mitra N, Efstathiou J et al (2011) Outcomes after intensity-modulated versus conformal radiotherapy in older men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 81:e325–e334

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Michalski JM, Gay H, Jackson A et al (2010) Radiation dose-volume effects in radiation-induced rectal injury. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 76:S123–S129

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Sveistrup J, af Rosenschold PM, Deasy JO et al (2014) Improvement in toxicity in high risk prostate cancer patients treated with image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy compared to 3 d conformal radiotherapy without daily image guidance. Radiat Oncol 9:44

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Zelefsky MJ, Kollmeier M, Cox B et al (2012) Improved clinical outcomes with high-dose image guided radiotherapy compared with non-igrt for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 84:125–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fiorino C, Valdagni R, Rancati T et al (2009) Dose-volume effects for normal tissues in external radiotherapy: Pelvis. Radiother Oncol 93:153–167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McNair HA, Hansen VN, Parker CC et al (2008) A comparison of the use of bony anatomy and internal markers for offline verification and an evaluation of the potential benefit of online and offline verification protocols for prostate radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 71:41–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nijkamp J, Pos FJ, Nuver TT et al (2008) Adaptive radiotherapy for prostate cancer using kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography: First clinical results. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 70:75–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. de Boer HC, van Os MJ, Jansen PP et al (2005) Application of the no action level (nal) protocol to correct for prostate motion based on electronic portal imaging of implanted markers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 61:969–983

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wortel RC, Incrocci L, Pos FJ et al (2015) Acute toxicity after image-guided intensity modulated radiation therapy compared to 3 d conformal radiation therapy in prostate cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 91:737–744

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wortel RC, Witte MG, van der Heide UA et al (2015) Dose-surface maps identifying local dose-effects for acute gastrointestinal toxicity after radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 117:515–520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich (USZ), Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zürich, Schweiz

    Tobias Finazzi &  Matthias Guckenberger MD

Authors
  1. Tobias Finazzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matthias Guckenberger MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthias Guckenberger MD.

Additional information

Originalpublikation Wortel RC, Incrocci L, Pos FJ et al (2016) Late side effects after image guided intensity modulated radiation therapy compared to 3D-conformal radiation therapy for prostate cancer: results from 2 prospective cohorts. Int J Radiation Oncol Biol Phys 95(2):680–689

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Finazzi, T., Guckenberger, M. Bildgeführte intensitätsmodulierte Strahlentherapie vermindert die gastrointestinalen Spätfolgen nach Radiotherapie des Prostatakarzinoms. Strahlenther Onkol 193, 162–164 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-016-1088-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-016-1088-3

Search

Navigation