Skip to main content
Log in

Some Notes on a Method for Proving Inequalities by Computer

  • Published:
Results in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article we consider mathematical fundamentals of one method for proving inequalities by computer, based on the Remez algorithm. Using the well-known results of undecidability of the existence of zeros of real elementary functions, we demonstrate that the considered method generally in practice becomes one heuristic for the verification of inequalities. We give some improvements of the inequalities considered in the theorems for which the existing proofs have been based on the numerical verifications of Remez algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Remez E.Y.: Sur le calcul effectif des polynômes d’approximation de Tschebyscheff. CR Acad. Sci. Paris 199, 337–340 (1934)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Novodvorski E.P., Pinsker I.S.: Process of equating maxima (in Russian). Usp. Mat. Nauk. 6(6), 174–181 (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Veidinger L.: On the numerical determination of the best approximations in the Chebyshev sense. Numer. Math. 2, 99–105 (1960)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Fraser, W., Hart, J.F.: On the computation of rational approximations to continuous functions. Commun. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 5, 401–403, 414 (1962)

  5. Cheney, E.W.: Introduction to Approximation Theory. McGraw-Hill Inc., Maidenheach (1966)

  6. Richman, P.L.: Compressible fluid flow and the approximation of iterated integrals of a singular function. Math. Comput. 23(106), 355–372. (http://www.ams.org/journals/mcom/1969-23-106/S0025-5718-1969-0242386-8/) (1969)

  7. Mitrinović D.S., Vasić P.M.: Analytic Inequalities. Springer, Berlin (1970)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Cody W.J.: A survey of practical rational and polynomial approximation of functions. SIAM Rev. 12(3), 400–423 (1970)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Kurepa, Dj.: Left factorial in complex domain. Math. Balk. 3, 297–307. (http://elibrary.matf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/545) (1973)

  10. Wang, P.S.: The undecidability of the existence of zeros of real elementary functions. J. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 21, 586–589. (http://librarum.org/book/1752/) (1974)

  11. Hart, J.F. (ed.): Computer Approximations. Krieger, New York (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Petrushev P.P., Popov V.I.: Rational Approximation of Real Functions. Cambridge Univeristy Press, Cambridge (1987)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Geddes, K.O.: A package for numerical approximation. The maple technical newsletter, Vol. 10, pp. 28–36. (https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/~kogeddes/papers/Numapprox/Numapprox.html) (1993)

  14. Litvinov, G.L.: Approximate construction of rational approximations and the effect of error autocorrection. Appl. Russ. J. Math. Phys. 1(3), 313–352. (see also arXiv:math/0101042, 2001) (1994)

  15. Ivić, A., Mijajlović, Ž.: On Kurepa problems in number theory. Publ. Inst. Math. Nouv. serie, Tome. 57, 19–28. (http://publications.mi.sanu.ac.rs/) (1995)

  16. Malešević, B.J.: Application of lambda method on Shafer-Fink’s inequality. Publ. Elektrotehn. Fak. Ser. Mat. (8), 90–92. (http://pefmath2.etf.rs/) (1997)

  17. Popov, B., Laushnyk, O.: Apackage of function approximation. Maplesoft. (http://www.maplesoft.com/applications/view.aspx?SID=4030&view=html) (2001)

  18. Bornemann, F., Laurie, D., Wagon, S., Waldvogel, J.: The SIAM hundred-digit challenge, a study in high-accuracy numerical computing. SIAM. (http://www.siam.org/books/100digitchallenge/, see also page of N. Trefethen’s website http://people.maths.ox.ac.uk/trefethen/hundred.html) (2004)

  19. Dunham, C.B.: Historical Overview of Unisolvence and Remez Algorithm. Tech. rep. 620, University of Western Ontario, Department of Computer Science (2004)

  20. Malešević, B.J.: Some inequalities for Kurepa’s function. J. Inequal. Pure Appl. Math. 5(4), Article 84 (2004)

  21. Robinson, T.A.: Automated generation of numerical evaluation routines. Master Thesis of Mathematics in Computer Science, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada (2005)

  22. Robinson, T.A., Geddes, K.O.: Automated generation of numerical evaluation routines. In: Maple Conference 2005, Ilias S. Kotsireas (ed.), University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, pp. 383–398 (2005)

  23. Mayans, R.: The Chebyshev equioscillation theorem. J. Online Math. Appl. 6, Article ID 1316. (http://mathdl.maa.org/mathDL/4/?nodeId=1316&pa=content&sa=viewDocument) (2006)

  24. Muller, J.M.: Elementary Functions Algorithms and Implementation. 2nd edn. Birkhäuser, Boston (2006)

  25. Malešević, B.J.: One method for prooving inequalities by computer. J. Inequal. Appl. 2007, Article ID 78691, 8. (http://www.hindawi.com/journals/jia/) (2007)

  26. Zhu L.: A solution of a problem of Oppenheim. Math. Inequal. Appl. 10(1), 57–61 (2007)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Malešević B.J.: An application of \({\lambda}\) -method on inequalities of Shafer-Fink’s type. Math. Inequal. Appl. 10(3), 529–534 (2007)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhu, L.: On Shafer-Fink-type inequality. J. Inequal. Appl. 2007, Article ID 67430, 4 (2007)

  29. Zhu, L.: New inequalities of Shafer-Fink type for arc hyperbolic sine. J. Inequal. Appl. 2008, Article ID 368275, 5 (2008)

  30. Mastroianni G., Milovanović G.V.: Interpolation Processes: Basic Theory and Applications. Springer, Berlin (2008)

  31. Zhu L.: A source of inequalities for circular functions. Comput. Math. Appl. 58(10), 1998–2004 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. de Abreu G.T.F.: Jensen-cotes upper and lower bounds on the gaussian Q-function and related functions. IEEE Trans. Commun. 57(11), 3328–3338 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Qi, F., Niu, D.-W., Guo, B.-N.: Refinements, generalizations and applications of Jordan’s inequality and related problems. J. Inequal. Appl. 2009, Article ID 271923, 52 (2009)

  34. Qi, F., Zhang, S.-Q., Guo, B.-N.: Sharpening and generalizations of Shafer’s inequality for the arc tangent function. J. Inequal. Appl. 2009, Article ID 930294, 9 (2009)

  35. Guo S.-Q., Qi F.: Monotonicity results and inequalities for the inverse hyperbolic sine. Chin. Q. J. Math. 24(3), 388–394 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Malešević, B.J.: A note about the \(\{K_i(z)\}_{i=1}^{\infty} \,\) functions. Rocky Mt. J. Math. 40(5), 1645–1648 (2010)

  37. Guo B.-N., Qi F.: Sharpening and generalizations of Carlson’s inequality for the arc cosine function. Hacet. J. Math. Stat. 39(3), 403–409 (2010)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Mortici C.: The natural approach of Wilker-Cusa-Huygens inequalities. Math. Inequal. Appl. 14(3), 535–541 (2011)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Chen, C.-P., Cheung, W.-S., Wang, W.: On Shafer and Carlson Inequalites. J. Inequal. Appl. 2011, Article ID 840206, 10 (2011)

  40. Chen, C.-P., Cheung, W.-S.: Sharp Cusa and Becker-Stark inequalities. J. Inequal. Appl. 2011:136, 6 (2011)

  41. Sun, Z., Zhu, L.: On new Wilker-type inequalities. ISRN Math. Anal. 2011, Article ID 681702, 7 (2011)

  42. Chen, C.-P., Cheung, W.-S.: Sharpness of Wilker and Huygens type inequalities. J. Inequal. Appl. 2012, 72 (2012)

  43. Qi F., Guo B.-N.: Sharpening and generalizations of Shafer’s inequality for the arc sine function. Integr. Transforms Spec. Funct. 23(2), 129–134 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhao J.-L., Wei C.-F., Guo B.-N., Qi F.: Sharpening and generalizations of Carlson’s double inequality for the arc cosine function. Hacet. J. Math. Stat. 41(2), 201–209 (2012)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Qi F., Luo Q.-M., Guo B.-N.: A simple proof of Oppenheim’s double inequality relating to the cosine and sine functions. J. Math. Inequal. 6(4), 645–654 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Chen C.-P., Sandor J.: Inequality chains related to trigonometric and hyperbolic functions and inverse trigonometric and hyperbolic functions. J. Math. Inequal. 7(4), 569–575 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Guo B.-N., Luo Q.-M., Qi F.: Sharpening and generalizations of Shafer-Fink’s double inequality for the arc sine function. Filomat 27(2), 261–265 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  48. Deng, J.-E., Chen, C.-P.: Sharp Shafer-Fink type inequalities for Gauss lemniscate functions. J. Inequal. Appl. 2014, 35 (2014)

  49. Debnath, L., Zhu, L., Mortici, C.: Inequalities Becker-Stark at extreme points, Results Math. doi:10.1007/s00025-014-0405-3 (2014)

  50. Poonen, B.: Undecidable problems: a sampler, Chapter in the book J. Kennedy (ed.), Interpreting Gödel: critical essays. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 211–241. (http://math.mit.edu/~poonen/papers/sampler) (2014)

  51. Rozenberg, G., Salomaa, A.: Undecidability, encyclopedia of mathematics. (http://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Undecidability) (2014)

  52. Malešević, B., Makragić, M.: A method of proving a class of inequalities of mixed real trigonometric polynomial functions. arXiv:1504.08345 (2015)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Branko Malešević.

Additional information

Research is partially supported by the Ministry of Science and Education of the Republic of Serbia, Grants ON 174032 and III 44006.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Banjac, B., Makragić, M. & Malešević, B. Some Notes on a Method for Proving Inequalities by Computer. Results. Math. 69, 161–176 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00025-015-0485-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00025-015-0485-8

Mathematics Subject Classification

Keywords

Navigation