Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Identification of Bedrock Lithology using Fractal Dimensions of Drainage Networks extracted from Medium Resolution LiDAR Digital Terrain Models

  • Published:
Pure and Applied Geophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Geologists know that drainage networks can exhibit different drainage patterns depending on the hydrogeological properties of the underlying materials. Geographic Information System (GIS) technologies and the increasing availability and resolution of digital elevation data have greatly facilitated the delineation, quantification, and study of drainage networks. This study investigates the possibility of inferring geological information of the underlying material from fractal and linear parameters describing drainage networks automatically extracted from 5-m-resolution LiDAR digital terrain model (DTM) data. According to the lithological information (scale 1:25,000), the study area is comprised of 30 homogeneous bedrock lithologies, the lithological map units (LMUs). These are mostly igneous and metamorphic rocks, but also include some sedimentary rocks. A statistical classification model of the LMUs by rock type has been proposed based on both the fractal dimension and drainage density of the overlying drainage networks. The classification model has been built using 16 LMUs, and it has correctly classified 13 of the 14 LMUs used for its validation. Results for the study area show that LMUs, with areas ranging from 177.83 ± 0.01 to 3.16 ± 0.01 km2, can be successfully classified by rock type using the fractal dimension and the drainage density of the drainage networks derived from medium resolution LiDAR DTM data with different flow support areas. These results imply that the information included in a 5-m-resolution LiDAR DTM and the appropriate techniques employed to manage it are the only inputs required to identify the underlying geological materials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allum, J.A.E., Photogeology and regional mapping (Pergamon Press, Oxford 1966).

  • Ariza-Villaverde, A.B., Jiménez-Hornero, F.J., and Gutiérrez de Ravé, E. (2013), Multifractal Analysis Applied to the Study of the Accuracy of DEM-Based Stream Derivation, Geomorphology 197, 85–95.

  • Bloomfield, J.P., Bricker, S.H., and Newell, A.J. (2011), Some Relationships between Lithology, Basin Form and Hydrology: A Case Study from the Thames Basin, UK. Hydrol. Process. 25, 2518–2530.

  • Cámara, J., Gómez-Miguel, V., and Martín, M.A. (2013), Lithologic Control on the Scaling Properties of the First-Order Streams of Drainage Networks: A Monofractal Analysis, Vadose Zone J. 12, 1–8.

  • Cámara, J., Gómez-Miguel, V., and Martín, M.A. (2015), Quantifying the Relationship Between Drainage Networks at Hillslope Scale and Particle Size Distribution at Pedon Scale, Fractals 23, 1540007.

  • Cartwright, R., Clayton, J.A., and Kirk, R.L. (2011), Channel Morphometry, Sediment Transport, and Implications for Tectonic Activity and Surficial Ages of Titan Basins, Icarus 214, 561–570.

  • De Bartolo, S.G., Gabriele, S., and Gaudio, R. (2000), Multifractal Behaviour of River Networks. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 4, 105–112.

  • De Bartolo, S.G., Gaudio, R., and Gabriele, S. (2004), Multifractal Analysis of River Networks: Sandbox Approach. Water Resour. Res. 40, W02201.

  • De Bartolo, S.G., Veltri, M., and Primavera, L. (2006), Estimated Generalized Dimensions of River Networks. J. Hydrol. 322, 181–191.

  • Dombradi, E., Timár, G., Bada, G., Cloetingh, S., and Horváth, F. (2007), Fractal Dimension Estimations of Drainage Network in the Carpathian-Pannonian System, Global Planet. Change 58, 197–213.

  • Gaudio, R., De Bartolo, S.G., Primavera, L., Veltri, M., and Gabriele, S. (2004), Procedures in Multifractal Analysis of River Networks: A State of the Art Review, IAHS Publ. 286, 228–237.

  • Gaudio, R., De Bartolo, S.G., Primavera, L., Gabriele, S., and Veltri, M. (2006), Lithologic Control on the Multifractal Spectrum of River Networks, J. Hydrol. 327, 365–375.

  • Gómez-Miguel, V., Sotés, V., Cámara, J., and Hernando, G., Delimitación de las Zonas Vitícolas de la DO Arribes. Informe Técnico no Publicado (Univ. Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid 2011).

  • Helmlinger, K.R., Kumar, P., and Foufoula-Georgiou, E. (1993), On the Use of Digital Elevation Model Data for Hortonian and Fractal Analyses of Channel Networks, Water Resour. Res. 29, 2599–2613.

  • Horton, R.E. (1932), Drainage Basin Characteristics, Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 13, 350–361.

  • Horton, R.E. (1945), Erosional Development of Streams and Their Drainage Basins: Hydrophysical Approach to Quantitative Morphology, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 56, 275–370.

  • Howard, A.D. (1967), Drainage Analysis in Geologic Interpretation: A Summation, AAPG Bulletin 51, 2246–2259.

  • Hurtrez, J., and Lucazeau, F. (1999), Lithologic Control on Relief and Hypsometry in the Herault Drainage Basin (France), Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences-Series 11A-Earth and Planetary Science 328, 687–694.

  • Hynek, B.M., and Phillips, R.J. (2003), New Data Reveal Mature, Integrated Drainage Systems on Mars Indicative of Past Precipitation, Geology 31, 757–760.

  • Köppen, W. (1918), Klassification der Klimate nach Temperatur, Niederschlag und Jahreslauf, Petermanns Geogr. Mitt. 64, 193–203.

  • Köppen, W., and Geiger, R., Die Klimate der Erde (Verlag Justus Perthes, Gotha 1928).

  • Lifton, N.A., and Chase, C.G. (1992), Tectonic, Climatic, and Lithologic Influences on Landscape Fractal Dimension and Hypsometry: Implications for Landscape Evolution in the San Gabriel Mountains, California, Geomorphology 5, 77–114.

  • Lin, H. (2003), Hydropedology: Bridging Disciplines, Scales, and Data, Vadose Zone J. 2, 1–11.

  • Maidment, D.R., ArcHydro: GIS for Water Resources (ESRI Press, Redlands 2002).

  • Mandelbrot, B.B., The Fractal Geometry of Nature (W.H. Freeman, New York 1983).

  • McDonell, J.J., Sivapalan, M., Vaché, K., Dunn, S., Grant, G., Haggerty, R., Hinz, C., Hooper, R., Kirchner, J., Roderick, M.L., Selker, J., and Weiler, M. (2007), Moving Beyond Heterogeneity and Process Complexity: A New Vision for Watershed Hydrology, Water Resour. Res. 43, W07301.

  • Montgomery, D.R., and Dietrich, W.E. (1988), Where Do Channels Begin? Nature 336, 232–234.

  • Montgomery, D.R., and Dietrich, W.E. (1992), Channel Initiation and the Problem of Landscape Scale, Science 255, 826–830.

  • O’Callaghan, J., and Mark, D.M. (1984), The Extraction of Drainage Networks from Digital Elevation Data, Comput. Vision Graph. 3, 323–344.

  • Pike, R.J., and Wilson, S.E. (1971), Elevation-Relief Ratio, Hypsometric Integral and Geomorphic Area-Altitude Analysis, Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull. 82, 1079–1084.

  • Poulsen, J., and French, A. (2004), Discriminant function analysis (DA). Retrieved April 20, 2015, from http://userwww.sfsu.edu/efc/classes/biol710/discrim/discrim.pdf.

  • Rodríguez-Iturbe, I., and Rinaldo, A., Fractal River Basins: Chance and Self-Organization (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge 1997).

  • Russel, D., Hanson, J., and Otto, E. (1980), Dimension of Strange Attractors, Physical Review Letters 45, 1175–1178.

  • Schwanghart, W., Groom, G., Kuhn, N.J., and Heckrath, G. (2013), Flow Network Derivation from a High Resolution DEM in a Low Relief, Agrarian Landscape, Earth Surf. Process. Landforms 38, 1576–1586.

  • Singh, O., Sarangi, A., and Sharma, M.C. (2008), Hypsometric Integral Estimation Methods and Its Relevance on Erosion Status of North-Western Lesser Himalayan Watersheds, Water Resour. Manage. 22, 1545–1560.

  • Soil Survey Staff, Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 12th ed. (USDA, National Resources Conservation Service, National Soil Survey Center, Lincoln 2014).

  • Strahler, A.N. (1952), Hypsometric (Area-Altitude) Analysis of Erosional Topography, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 63, 1117–1142.

  • Strahler, A.N. (1957), Quantitative Analysis of Watershed Geomorphology, Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 38, 913–920.

  • Tarboton, D.G. (1997), A New Method for the Determination of Flow Directions and Upslope Area in Grid Digital Elevation Models, Water Resour. Res. 33, 309–319.

  • Tesfa, T.K., Tarboton, D.G., Watson, D.W., Schreuders, K.A.T., Baker, M.E., and Wallace, R.M. (2011), Extraction of Hydrological Proximity Measures from DEMs Using Parallel Processing, Environ. Modell. Softw. 26, 1696–1709.

  • Vaze, J., Teng, J., and Spencer, G. (2010), Impact of DEM Accuracy and Resolution on Topographic Indices, Environ. Modell. Softw. 25, 1086–1098.

  • Zandbergen, P.A. (2010), Accuracy Considerations in the Analysis of Depressions in Medium-Resolution LIDAR DEMs, GISci. Remote Sens. 47, 187–207.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was partially funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) through the research project “SUVIDUR: Sustainability of viticulture in the area of the Douro River”. Miguel Ángel Martín was supported in part by the Plan Nacional de Investigación Científica y Técnica (Spain) under ref. AGL-2011-25175.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Edafología, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, E.T.S.I. Agrónomos, Avda. Puerta de Hierro 2, 28040, Madrid, Spain

    Joaquín Cámara & Vicente Gómez-Miguel

  2. Departamento de Matemática Aplicada, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, E.T.S.I. Agrónomos, Avda. Puerta de Hierro 2, 28040, Madrid, Spain

    Miguel Ángel Martín

Authors
  1. Joaquín Cámara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vicente Gómez-Miguel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Miguel Ángel Martín
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joaquín Cámara.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cámara, J., Gómez-Miguel, V. & Martín, M.Á. Identification of Bedrock Lithology using Fractal Dimensions of Drainage Networks extracted from Medium Resolution LiDAR Digital Terrain Models. Pure Appl. Geophys. 173, 945–961 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-015-1130-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-015-1130-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation