Abstract
R-symmetry leads to a distinct low energy realisation of SUSY with a signicantly modified colour-charged sector featuring a Dirac gluino and scalar colour octets (sgluons). In the present work we recast results from LHC BSM searches to discuss the impact of R-symmetry on the squark and gluino mass limits. We work in the framework of the Minimal R-symmetric Supersymmetric Standard Model and take into account the NLO corrections to the squark production cross sections in the MRSSM that have become available recently. We find substantially weaker limits on squark masses compared to the MSSM: for simple scenarios with heavy gluinos and degenerate squarks, the MRSSM mass limit is \( {m}_{\tilde{g}} \) > 1:7TeV, approximately 600 GeV lower than in the MSSM.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
G.D. Kribs, E. Poppitz and N. Weiner, Flavor in supersymmetry with an extended R-symmetry, Phys. Rev.D 78 (2008) 055010 [arXiv:0712.2039] [INSPIRE].
P. Fayet, Supergauge invariant extension of the Higgs mechanism and a model for the electron and its neutrino, Nucl. Phys.B 90 (1975) 104 [INSPIRE].
E. Dudas, M. Goodsell, L. Heurtier and P. Tziveloglou, Flavour models with Dirac and fake gluinos, Nucl. Phys.B 884 (2014) 632 [arXiv:1312.2011] [INSPIRE].
P. Dieβner, J. Kalinowski, W. Kotlarski and D. Stöckinger, Higgs boson mass and electroweak observables in the MRSSM, JHEP12 (2014) 124 [arXiv:1410.4791] [INSPIRE].
P. Diessner, J. Kalinowski, W. Kotlarski and D. Stöckinger, Two-loop correction to the Higgs boson mass in the MRSSM, Adv. High Energy Phys.2015 (2015) 760729 [arXiv:1504.05386] [INSPIRE].
P. Diessner, J. Kalinowski, W. Kotlarski and D. Stöckinger, Exploring the Higgs sector of the MRSSM with a light scalar, JHEP03 (2016) 007 [arXiv:1511.09334] [INSPIRE].
P. Diessner and G. Weiglein, Precise prediction for the W boson mass in the MRSSM, JHEP07 (2019) 011 [arXiv:1904.03634] [INSPIRE].
W. Kotlarski, D. Stöckinger and H. Stöckinger-Kim, Low-energy lepton physics in the MRSSM: (g − 2)μ, μ → eγ and μ → e conversion, JHEP08 (2019) 082 [arXiv:1902.06650] [INSPIRE].
M. Heikinheimo, M. Kellerstein and V. Sanz, How many supersymmetries?, JHEP04 (2012) 043 [arXiv:1111.4322] [INSPIRE].
M. Herquet, R. Knegjens and E. Laenen, Single top production in a non-minimal supersymmetric model, Phys. Lett.B 693 (2010) 591 [arXiv:1005.2900] [INSPIRE].
G.D. Kribs, A. Martin and T.S. Roy, Squark avor violation at the LHC, JHEP06 (2009) 042 [arXiv:0901.4105] [INSPIRE].
G. Chalons et al., LHC limits on gluinos and squarks in the minimal Dirac gaugino model, JHEP04 (2019) 113 [arXiv:1812.09293] [INSPIRE].
W. Kotlarski, Sgluons in the same-sign lepton searches, JHEP02 (2017) 027 [arXiv:1608.00915] [INSPIRE].
T. Plehn and T.M.P. Tait, Seeking sgluons, J. Phys.G 36 (2009) 075001 [arXiv:0810.3919] [INSPIRE].
S.Y. Choi et al., Color-octet scalars of N = 2 supersymmetry at the LHC, Phys. Lett.B 672 (2009) 246 [arXiv:0812.3586] [INSPIRE].
G.D. Kribs and A. Martin, Dirac gauginos in supersymmetry | suppressed jets + MET signals: a Snowmass whitepaper, arXiv:1308.3468 [INSPIRE].
G.D. Kribs and A. Martin, Supersoft supersymmetry is super-safe, Phys. Rev.D 85 (2012) 115014 [arXiv:1203.4821] [INSPIRE].
P. Diessner, W. Kotlarski, S. Liebschner and D. Söckinger, Squark production in R-symmetric SUSY with Dirac gluinos: NLO corrections, JHEP10 (2017) 142 [arXiv:1707.04557] [INSPIRE].
F. Staub, SARAH, arXiv:0806.0538 [INSPIRE].
F. Staub, From superpotential to model files for FeynArts and CalcHep/CompHEP, Comput. Phys. Commun.181 (2010) 1077 [arXiv:0909.2863] [INSPIRE].
F. Staub, Automatic calculation of supersymmetric renormalization group equations and self energies, Comput. Phys. Commun.182 (2011) 808 [arXiv:1002.0840] [INSPIRE].
W. Porod and F. Staub, SPheno 3.1: extensions including avour, CP-phases and models beyond the MSSM, Comput. Phys. Commun.183 (2012) 2458 [arXiv:1104.1573] [INSPIRE].
F. Staub, SARAH 3.2: Dirac gauginos, UFO output and more, Comput. Phys. Commun.184 (2013) 1792 [arXiv:1207.0906] [INSPIRE].
F. Staub, SARAH 4: a tool for (not only SUSY) model builders, Comput. Phys. Commun.185 (2014) 1773 [arXiv:1309.7223] [INSPIRE].
M.D. Goodsell, K. Nickel and F. Staub, Two-Loop Higgs mass calculations in supersymmetric models beyond the MSSM with SARAH and SPheno, Eur. Phys. J.C 75 (2015) 32 [arXiv:1411.0675] [INSPIRE].
M. Goodsell, K. Nickel and F. Staub, Generic two-loop Higgs mass calculation from a diagrammatic approach, Eur. Phys. J.C 75 (2015) 290 [arXiv:1503.03098] [INSPIRE].
J. Bellm et al., HERWIG 7.0/HERWIG++ 3.0 release note, Eur. Phys. J.C 76 (2016) 196 [arXiv:1512.01178] [INSPIRE].
J. Bellm et al., HERWIG 7.1 release note, arXiv:1705.06919 [INSPIRE].
C. Degrande et al., UFO — The Universal FeynRules Output, Comput. Phys. Commun.183 (2012) 1201 [arXiv:1108.2040] [INSPIRE].
M. Drees et al., CheckMATE: confronting your favourite new physics model with LHC data, Comput. Phys. Commun.187 (2015) 227 [arXiv:1312.2591] [INSPIRE].
DELPHES 3 collaboration, DELPHES 3, a modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment, JHEP02 (2014) 057 [arXiv:1307.6346] [INSPIRE].
M. Cacciari, G.P. Salam and G. Soyez, FastJet user manual, Eur. Phys. J.C 72 (2012) 1896 [arXiv:1111.6097] [INSPIRE].
M. Cacciari and G.P. Salam, Dispelling the N 3myth for the k tjet-finder, Phys. Lett.B 641 (2006) 57 [hep-ph/0512210] [INSPIRE].
M. Cacciari, G.P. Salam and G. Soyez, The anti-k tjet clustering algorithm, JHEP04 (2008) 063 [arXiv:0802.1189] [INSPIRE].
W. Beenakker et al., NLO+NLL squark and gluino production cross-sections with threshold-improved parton distributions, Eur. Phys. J.C 76 (2016) 53 [arXiv:1510.00375] [INSPIRE].
W. Beenakker, C. Borschensky, M. Krämer, A. Kulesza and E. Laenen, NNLL-fast: predictions for coloured supersymmetric particle production at the LHC with threshold and Coulomb resummation, JHEP12 (2016) 133 [arXiv:1607.07741] [INSPIRE].
J. Alwall et al., MadGraph 5: going beyond, JHEP06 (2011) 128 [arXiv:1106.0522] [INSPIRE].
J. Alwall et al., The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections and their matching to parton shower simulations, JHEP07 (2014) 079 [arXiv:1405.0301] [INSPIRE].
R. Frederix, S. Frixione, F. Maltoni and T. Stelzer, Automation of next-to-leading order computations in QCD: the FKS subtraction, JHEP10 (2009) 003 [arXiv:0908.4272] [INSPIRE].
A. Buckley et al., LHAPDF6: parton density access in the LHC precision era, Eur. Phys. J.C 75 (2015) 132 [arXiv:1412.7420] [INSPIRE].
L.A. Harland-Lang, A.D. Martin, P. Motylinski and R.S. Thorne, Parton distributions in the LHC era: MMHT 2014 PDFs, Eur. Phys. J.C 75 (2015) 204 [arXiv:1412.3989] [INSPIRE].
G. Cullen et al., Automated one-loop calculations with GoSam, Eur. Phys. J.C 72 (2012) 1889 [arXiv:1111.2034] [INSPIRE].
G. Cullen et al., GoSam-2.0: a tool for automated one-loop calculations within the Standard Model and beyond, Eur. Phys. J.C 74 (2014) 3001 [arXiv:1404.7096] [INSPIRE].
P. Nogueira, Automatic Feynman graph generation, J. Comput. Phys.105 (1993) 279.
J.A.M. Vermaseren, New features of FORM, math-ph/0010025 [INSPIRE].
P. Mastrolia, E. Mirabella and T. Peraro, Integrand reduction of one-loop scattering amplitudes through Laurent series expansion, JHEP06 (2012) 095 [Erratum ibid.11 (2012) 128] [arXiv:1203.0291] [INSPIRE].
T. Peraro, Ninja: automated integrand reduction via Laurent expansion for one-loop amplitudes, Comput. Phys. Commun.185 (2014) 2771 [arXiv:1403.1229] [INSPIRE].
H. van Deurzen et al., Multi-leg one-loop massive amplitudes from integrand reduction via Laurent expansion, JHEP03 (2014) 115 [arXiv:1312.6678] [INSPIRE].
A. van Hameren, OneLOop: For the evaluation of one-loop scalar functions, Comput. Phys. Commun.182 (2011) 2427 [arXiv:1007.4716] [INSPIRE].
T. Binoth et al., Golem95: a numerical program to calculate one-loop tensor integrals with up to six external legs, Comput. Phys. Commun.180 (2009) 2317 [arXiv:0810.0992] [INSPIRE].
G. Cullen et al., Golem95C: A library for one-loop integrals with complex masses, Comput. Phys. Commun.182 (2011) 2276 [arXiv:1101.5595] [INSPIRE].
J.P. Guillet, G. Heinrich and J.F. von Soden-Fraunhofen, Tools for NLO automation: extension of the golem95C integral library, Comput. Phys. Commun.185 (2014) 1828 [arXiv:1312.3887] [INSPIRE].
T. Binoth et al., A proposal for a standard interface between Monte Carlo tools and one-loop programs, Comput. Phys. Commun.181 (2010) 1612 [arXiv:1001.1307] [INSPIRE].
S. Alioli et al., Update of the Binoth Les Houches Accord for a standard interface between Monte Carlo tools and one-loop programs, Comput. Phys. Commun.185 (2014) 560 [arXiv:1308.3462] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Search for squarks and gluinos in final states with jets and missing transverse momentum at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J.C 76 (2016) 392 [arXiv:1605.03814] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Search for direct top squark pair production in events with a Higgs or Z boson and missing transverse momentum in \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector, ATLAS-CONF-2017-019 (2017).
ATLAS collaboration, Search for a scalar partner of the top quark in the jets plus missing transverse momentum final state at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP12 (2017) 085 [arXiv:1709.04183] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Search for supersymmetry at the high luminosity LHC with the ATLAS experiment, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2014-010 (2014).
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ArXiv ePrint: 1907.11641
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Diessner, P., Kalinowski, J., Kotlarski, W. et al. Confronting the coloured sector of the MRSSM with LHC data. J. High Energ. Phys. 2019, 120 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2019)120
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2019)120