Skip to main content
Log in

Mothers’ Perceptions of Childhood Immunizations in First Nations Communities of the Sioux Lookout Zone

  • Published:
Canadian Journal of Public Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: Low uptake of childhood immunizations is a problem in many First Nations communities. This article describes the results of a study that examined mothers’ perceptions of childhood immunizations and the factors that influence uptake.

Method: Person-centred interviews focussing on childhood immunizations and child health were conducted with 28 mothers of young children in two First Nations communities in the Sioux Lookout Zone. Content analysis was applied to the interview data and patterns and themes were developed.

Results: Data analysis identified four key factors as negatively influencing immunization uptake: knowledge barriers, the influence of others, vaccine barriers, and missed opportunities.

Conclusions: Further research with Elders and community members along with culturally sensitive education initiatives are required to address low immunization uptake. Changes in health professionals’ behaviours may serve to reduce missed opportunities.

Résumé

Objectif: Le but de cette recherche était l’examen du problème du faible taux de vaccination des enfants dans les communautés des Premières Nations. Spécifiquement, l’étude requiert une étude qui permet d’identifier les perceptions des mères dans les communautés des Premières Nations à l’égard de la vaccination des enfants, et les facteurs qui en influencent la représentation.

Conclusions: Vingt-huit mères de jeunes enfants dans deux communautés des Premières Nations de la région de Sioux Lookout ont participé à des entrevues personnalisées centrées sur la vaccination et la santé des enfants. On a procédé à une analyse de contenu sur les données recueillies lors des entrevues, puis des schémas et des thèmes ont été développés à partir de là.

Conclusions: L’analyse des données a permis d’identifier quatre facteurs clés responsables du faible taux de participation aux vaccinations; la barrière du savoir, l’influence des autres, la barrière des vaccins, et les occasions manquées.

Conclusions: Des recherches plus poussées avec des aînés et des membres de la communauté, ainsi que sur des initiatives d’enseignement liées au milieu culturel sont nécessaires pour parler du faible taux de participation aux vaccinations. Des changements dans les comportements des professionnels de la santé peuvent servir à réduire les occasions manquées.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Advisory Committee on Immunization. Canadian Immunization Guide, 5th ed. Ottawa: Health Canada, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  2. MacMillan HL, MacMillan AB, Offord DR, Dingle JL. Aboriginal health. Can Med Assoc J 1996;155:1569–78.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Canadian Institute of Child Health. The Health of Canada’s Children: A CICH Profile, 2nd Ed. Ottawa: Canadian Institute of Child Health, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Young TK. Sioux Lookout First Nations Health Authority Participatory Research Project: Final Report I - Health Needs Assessment (Report prepared for the Sioux Lookout First Nations Health Authority and Nishnawbe-Aski Nation). Winnipeg, MB: Northern Health Research Unit, Department of Community Health Sciences, The University of Manitoba, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Health Canada. Sioux Lookout Zone immunization statistics 1994 (Unpublished Data). Sioux Lookout, Ontario, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Johnson R. The development of a computerized health information system to facilitate program planning/evaluation and enhanced First Nations control of community health services. Can J Public Health 1997;88(3):207–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. National Advisory Committee on Immunization. Canadian national report on immunization 1997. Pediatrics and Child Health 1998;3(2).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Levy R, Hollan D. Person-centered interviewing and observation. In: Russell Bernard H (Ed.), Handbook of Methods in Cultural Anthropology. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press, 1998;333–64.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fetterman DM. Ethnography Step by Step. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Angelillo IF, Ricciardi G, Rossi P, et al. Mothers and vaccination: Knowledge, attitudes, and behaviour in Italy. Bull World Health Organ 1999;77(3):224–29.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Keane V, Stanton B, Horton L, et al. Perceptions of vaccine efficacy, illness, and health among inner-city parents. Clin Pediatr 1993;32(1):2–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. McCormick LK, Bartholomew LK, Lewis MJ, et al. Parental perceptions of barriers to childhood immunizations: Results of focus groups conducted in an urban population. Health Educ Res 1997;12(3):355–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. White GE, Thomson AN. ‘As every good mother should’. Childhood immunization in New Zealand: A qualitative study. Health and Soc Care 1995;3:73–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Young TK. Health Care and Cultural Change: The Indian Experience in the Central Subarctic. Toronto: University of Toronto, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lannon C, Brack V, Stuart J, et al. What mothers say about why poor children fall behind on immunizations. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1995;149:1070–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pruitt RH, Kline PM, Kovaz RB. Perceived barriers to childhood immunization among rural populations. J Community Health Nurs 1995;12(2):65–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Salsberry PJ, Nickel JT, Mitch R. Inadequate immunization among 2-year-old children: A profile of children at risk. J Pediatr Nurs 1994;9(3):158–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bradford BJ, Benedum KJ, Heald PA, Petrie SE. Immunization status of children on school entry: Area analysis and recommendations 1991. Clin Pediatr 1996;35(5):237–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gindler JS, Cutts FT, Barnett-Antinori ME, et al. Successes and failures in vaccine delivery: Evaluation of the immunization delivery system in Puerto Rico. Pediatrics 1993;91(2):315–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Holt E, Guyer B, Hughart N, et al. The contribution of missed opportunities to childhood underimmunization in Baltimore. Pediatrics 1996;97(4):474–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. McConnochie KM, Roghmann KJ. Immunization opportunities missed among urban poor children. Pediatrics 1992;89(6):1019–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sabnis SS, Pomeranz AJ, Lye PS, Amateau MM. Do missed opportunities stay missed? A 6-month follow-up of missed vaccine opportunities in inner city Milwaukee children. Pediatrics 1998;101(e5):1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Szilagyi PG, Rodewald LE, Humiston SG, et al. Missed opportunities for childhood vaccinations in office practices and the effect on vaccination status. Pediatrics 1993;91(1):1–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Campbell JR, Szilagyi PG, Rodewald LE, et al. Intent to immunize among pediatric family medicine residents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1994;148:926–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. England L, Stauton R, Schubert C. Immunizing preschool children: Beliefs and practices of pedi-atric residents. Clin Pediatr 1997;36(3):129–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hughart N, Guyer B, Stanton B, et al. Do provider practices conform to the new pediatric immunization standards. Arch Pediatr Adol Med 1994;148:930–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Salsberry PJ, Nickel JT, Mitch R. Missed opportunities to immunize preschoolers. Appl Nurs Res 1995;9(3):158–65.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wood D, Halfon N, Pereyra M, et al. Knowledge of childhood immunizations schedule and of contraindication to vaccinate by private and public providers in Los Angeles. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1996;15:140–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Zimmerman RK, Schlesselman JJ, Baird AL, Mieczkowski TA. A national survey to understand why physicians defer childhood immunizations. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1997;151:657–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Burgess MA, Levy M, Alperstein G, et al. ‘On the spot’ vaccination: Does it work? J Pediatr Child Health 1996;32:63–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Peckham C, Bedford H, Senturia Y, Ades A. The Peckham Report. National Immunisation Study: Factors Influencing Immunisation Uptake in Childhood. London, England: Department of Paediatric Epidemiology, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  32. National Immunization Program. Epidemiology and Prevention of Vaccine-preventable Diseases, 5th Ed. Atlanta: CDC, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  33. National Advisory Committee on Immunization. An advisory committee statement: Guidelines for childhood immunization practice. Can Commun Dis Rep 1997;23:1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Harper PG, Madlon-Kay J, Luxenberg MG, Tempest R. A clinic system to improve preschool vaccinations in a low socioeconomic status population. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1997;151:1220–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marie Tarrant RN, MN.

Additional information

Formerly Community Health Nurse, Medical Services Branch, Health Canada, Sioux Lookout, ON

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tarrant, M., Gregory, D. Mothers’ Perceptions of Childhood Immunizations in First Nations Communities of the Sioux Lookout Zone. Can J Public Health 92, 42–45 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03404842

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03404842

Navigation