Skip to main content
Log in

Injury in First Nations Communities in Ontario

  • Quantitative Research
  • Published:
Canadian Journal of Public Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: High and variable rates of injury have been reported in Aboriginal communities in Canada. This has not been well studied for specific injury types. We sought to compare the rate and categories of injuries leading to hospital admission among those in First Nations communities relative to those living in small northern and southern communities in Ontario.

Methods: Administrative data were used to define the study populations. The incidence of all-cause injury and specific injury categories for residents living in Ontario’s Aboriginal communities (N=28,816) was determined for 2004 using hospital discharge data. Comparisons were made with residents of small communities in northern (N=211,834) and southern Ontario (N=650,002). Age- and sex-adjusted rates were calculated.

Results: All-cause-injury age- and sex-adjusted rates were 2.5 times higher for those living in First Nations communities compared to those living in northern communities. Relative risks (RR) for specific injury types in First Nations compared with northern communities were: assault (RR=5.5 in females and 4.8 in males), intentional self-harm (RR=5.9 in females and 5.2 in males) and accidental poisoning (RR=4.9 in females and 3.7 in males). Differences were also seen between northern and southern communities: assault (RR=2.8 in females and 3.5 in males), intentional self-harm (RR=2.1 in females and 1.4 in males) and accidental poisoning (RR=2.2 in females and 1.7 in males).

Discussion: Injuries severe enough to require a hospital admission were higher in First Nations communities in northern Ontario relative to those in northern and southern Ontario communities. Higher rates of certain injuries were also noted in northern compared with southern communities. This underscores the importance of using a geographic comparison group.

Résumé

Contexte: La population autochtone au Canada présente des risques élevés et variables de blessure, mais ce problème important n’a pas été étudié en profondeur pour certains types de blessures particulières. Nous cherchons à comparer le taux et les catégories de blessures menant à une hospitalisation chez les collectivités des Premières nations et les personnes vivant dans de petites collectivités du Sud et du Nord de l’Ontario.

Méthodes: Nous avons utilisé des données administratives pour déterminer les populations de l’étude. Nous avons déterminé l’incidence de toutes les catégories de causes-blessures et de blessures particulières concernant les personnes vivant dans les collectivités autochtones de l’Ontario (N=28 816) pour l’année 2004, en utilisant les données de congé d’hôpital. Nous avons comparé les personnes vivant dans de petites collectivités au Nord (N=211 834) avec celles vivant au sud (N=650 002) de l’Ontario. Nous avons calculé les taux ajustés selon l’âge et le sexe.

Résultats: Tous les taux de blessure ajustés selon l’âge et le sexe étaient 2,5 fois plus élevés chez les personnes vivant dans des collectivités des Premières nations que chez celles vivant dans des collectivités du Nord. Les risques relatifs (RR) pour certains types de blessures particulières chez les collectivités des Premières nations comparativement aux collectivités du Nord étaient les suivants: grand risque d’hospitalisation à la suite d’une agression (RR=5,5 chez les femmes et 4,8 chez les hommes), d’une blessure intentionnelle infligée à soi-même (RR=5,9 chez les femmes et 5,2 chez les hommes) et d’un empoisonnement accidentel (RR=4,9 chez les femmes et 3,7 chez les hommes). Des différences étaient également notables entre les collectivités du Nord et du Sud: grand risque d’hospitalisation à la suite d’une agression (RR=2,8 chez les femmes et 3,5 chez les hommes), d’une blessure intentionnelle infligée à soi-même (RR=2,1 chez les femmes et 1,4 chez les hommes) et d’un empoisonnement accidentel (RR=2,2 chez les femmes et 1,7 chez les hommes).

Discussion: Les blessures qui sont suffisamment graves pour nécessiter une hospitalisation étaient plus fréquentes chez les personnes vivant dans les collectivités des Premières nations du Nord de l’Ontario que chez celles vivant dans les collectivités du Sud et du Nord de l’Ontario. Des risques élevés de certaines blessures ont également été observés chez les personnes vivant dans les collectivités du Nord par rapport à celles vivant dans les collectivités du Sud. Cela montre l’importance d’utiliser un groupe de comparaison géographique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adelson N. The embodiment of inequity: Health disparities in Aboriginal Canada. Can J Public Health 2005;96:45–61.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Health Canada. Health Policy Research Bulletin. Closing the gaps in aboriginal health. 2003;5. Available online at: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/sr-sr/alt_formats/hpb-dgps/pdf/pubs/hpr-rps/bull/2003-5-aborignal-autochtone/2003-5-aborignal-autochtone-eng.pdf (Accessed June 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Young KT. Review of research on aboriginal populations in Canada: Relevance to their health needs. BMJ 2003;327:419–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Health Canada. A Statistical Profile on the Health of First Nations in Canada, 2003. Available online at: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fniah-spnia/pubs/aborig-autoch/stats_profil-eng.php (Accessed June 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stevenson MR. At risk in two worlds: Injury mortality among indigenous people in the US and Australia, 1990–92. Austr N Z J Public Health 1998;22:641–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Clapham KF, Stevenson MR, Lo SK. Injury profiles of indigenous and non-indigenous people in New South Wales. Med J Austr 2006;184:217–20.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Macpherson A, Schull M, Manuel D, Cernat G, Redelmeier DA, Laupacis A. Injuries in Ontario. ICES Atlas. Toronto, ON: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Health Canada. Unintentional and Intentional Injury Profile for Aboriginal People in Canada 1990–1999. Ottawa, ON: Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Murray CJL, Lopez AD. Global mortality, disability, and the contribution of risk factors: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 1997;349 (9061):1436–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lopez AD, Mathers CD. Measuring the global burden of disease and epidemiological transitions: 2002–2030. Annals Trop Med Parasitol 2006;100:481–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shah BR, Hux JE, Zinman B. Increasing rates of ischemic heart disease in the native population of Ontario, Canada. Arch Intern Med 2000;160:1862–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Southcott C. Aboriginal Communities in Northern Ontario. 2001 Census Research Paper Series: Report #11, 2004. Available online at: http://www.train-ingboard.com/FeedStream/Content/aboriginals_11.pdf (Accessed June 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  13. World Health Organization. International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Karmali S, Laupland K, Harrop AR, Findlay C, Kirkpatrick AW, Winston B, et al. Epidemiology of severe trauma among status Aboriginal Canadians: A population-based study. CMAJ 2005;172:1007–10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Sampson RJ, Raudenbush SW, Earls F. Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science 1997;277:918–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Atwood JB. The link between poverty and violent conflict. N Engl J Public Policy 2003;90:159–65.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Colman I, Yiannakoulias N, Schopflocher D, Svenson LW, Rosychuk RJ, Rowe BH. Population-based study of medically treated self-inflicted injuries. CJEM 2004;6:313–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhao Y, Guthridge S, Magus A, Vos T. Burden of disease and injury in Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal populations in the Northern Territory. MJA 2004;180:498–502.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Williams GF, Chaboyer WP, Schluter PJ. Assault-related admissions to hospital in Central Australia. MJA 2002;177:300–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. National Institute of Justice. Impact evaluation of STOP grant program for reducing violence against women among Indian Tribes: Final Report (NIJ 195174), 2002. Available online at: http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/195174.pdf (Accessed June 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wahab S, Olson L. Intimate partner violence and sexual assault in Native American communities. Trauma, Violence and Abuse 2004;5:353–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Waldram JB, Herring DA, Young TK. Aboriginal Health in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Harris SB, Gittelsohn J, Hanley A, Barnie A, Wolever TM, Gao J. The prevalence of NIDDM and associated risk factors in native Canadians. Diabetes Care 1997;20:185–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Frohlich KL, Ross N, Richmond C. Health disparities in Canada today: Some evidence and a theoretical framework. Health Policy 2006;79:132–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Fantus MSc, MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fantus, D., Shah, B.R., Qiu, F. et al. Injury in First Nations Communities in Ontario. Can J Public Health 100, 258–262 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03403943

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03403943

Keywords

Mots clés

Navigation