Skip to main content
Log in

Performance of School Age Reading Disabled Students on the Phonological Awareness Subtests of the Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing (CTOPP)

  • General Article
  • Published:
Contemporary School Psychology: Formerly "The California School Psychologist" Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined the performance of reading disabled children on the two Phonological Awareness Subtests of the Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing (CTOPP). Participants performed significantly different on these two subtests with a poorer performance on the Elision subtest than Blending Words. In addition, the two subtests were not correlated for this group. Results suggest that, for reading disabled children, interpretation of the composite score may not be as useful as considering the individual subtests scores.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, M.J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V.W. (2007). Process Assessment of the Learner: Diagnostics for Reading and Writing-Second Edition. San Antonio, TX: Pearson

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, L., & Bryant, P.E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read—a causal connection. Nature, 301, 419–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Common core state standards for English language arts. Reading standards: Foundational skills, phonological awareness. Retrieved Jan. 2010 from http://www.scoe.net/castandards/agenda/2010/ela_ccs_recommendations.pdf

  • Cassady, J.C., Smith, L.L., & Putman, S.M. (2008). Phonological awareness development as a discrete process: Evidence for an integrative model. Reading Psychology, 29, 508–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christo, C., & Davis, J. (2008). Rapid naming and phonological processing as predictors of reading and spelling. The California School Psychologist, 13, 7–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christo, C., Davis, J., & Brock, S.E. (2009). Identifying, assessing, and treating dyslexia at school. New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J.D., Pikulsi, J.J. et al., (2003). Houghton Mifflin reading: A legacy of literacy. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, C.D. (2007). Differential Ability Scales-Second Edition. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelmann, S., & Bruner, E.C. (1983). Reading Mastery I and II: DISTAR Reading. Chicago, IL: Science Research Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, J.M., Lyon, R.G., Fuchs, L.S., & Barnes, M.A. (2007). Learning disabilities: From identification to intervention. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, U. (2002). Phonology, reading and dyslexia. A cross-linguistic perspective. Annals of Dyslexia, 52, 141–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurford, D.P. (2003). Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing. In B.S. Plake, J.C. Impara, & R.A. Spies, (Eds). The fifteenth mental measurement yearbook. Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, A.S., & Kaufman, N. (2004). Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement- Second Edition, Comprehensive Form. Bloomington, MN: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, I.Y., & Shankweiler, D (1985) Phonology and problems of learning to read and write. Remedial and Special Education, 6, 8–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, G.R., Shaywitz, S.E., & Shaywitz, B.A. (2003). A definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, N., & Brownell, R. (2005). Test of Auditory Processing Skills-Third Edition. Novato, CA: Academic Therapy Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrew, K.S., & Woodcock, R.W. (2001). Technical Manual Woodcock-Johnson III. Itaska, IL: Riverside Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C.A., Beck, I., Bell, L., & Hughes, C. (1987). Phonemic knowledge and learning to read are reciprocal: A longitudinal study of first grade children. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 33, 283–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pufpaff, L.H. (2009). A developmental continuum of phonological sensitivity skills. Psychology in the Schools, 46, 679–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosner, J., & Simon, D.P. (1971). The auditory analysis test: An initial report. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 4, 384–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sattler, J.M. (2008). Assessment of children: Cognitive foundations. San Diego, CA: Jerome M. Sattler, Publisher, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatschneider, C., Francis, D., Foorman, B., Fletcher, J., & Mehta, P. (1999). The dimensionality of phonological awareness: An application of item response theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 439–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Share, D.L., Jorm, A.F., Maclean, R., & Mathews, R. (1984). Sources of individual differences in reading acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1309–1324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaywitz, S. (1996). Dyslexia. Scientific American, November 1996, 98–104.

  • Shaywitz, S. (2004). Overcoming dyslexia: A new and complete science-based program for reading problems at any level. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, S.A., & Murray, B.A. (1994). Defining phonological awareness and its relationship to early reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(2), 221–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K.E., Cunningham, A.E., & Cramer, B.B. (1984). Assessing phonological awareness in kindergarten children: Issues of task comparability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38, 175–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., Rashotte, C.A., Rose, E., Lindamood, P., Conway, J., & Garvin, C. (1999). Preventing reading failure in young children with phonological processing disabilities: Group and individual responses to instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 579–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veluntino, F.R., Fletcher, J.M., Snowling, M.J., & Scanlon, D.M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past decades? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 2–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R.K., Torgensen, J.K., Laughton, P., Simmons, K., & Rashotte, C. (1993). Development of young readers’ phonological processing abilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 83–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R.K., Torgesen, J.K., & Rashotte, C.A. (1994). Development of reading related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bi-directional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 30, 73–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R.K., Torgesen, J.K., & Rashotte, C.A. (1999). Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, R. (2009). Word games: the importance of defining phonemic awareness for professional discourse. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 32, 211–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M., & Bowers, P. (1999). The “double-deficit hypothesis” for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R.W., McGrew, K.S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III. Tests of Cognitive Abilities. Itasca, IL: Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R.W., McGrew, K.S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III. Tests of Achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yopp, H.K. (1988). The validity and reliability of phonemic awareness tests. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 159–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine Christo PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marshall, D., Christo, C. & Davis, J. Performance of School Age Reading Disabled Students on the Phonological Awareness Subtests of the Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing (CTOPP). Contemp School Psychol 17, 93–101 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03340991

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03340991

KEYWORDS

Navigation