Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Post-operative degree of mobilization at two weeks predicts one-year mortality after hip fracture

  • Section on Longitudinal Studies
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims: Although several investigations have tested physical activity a few months or one year after hip fracture, only a few have assessed physical activity shortly after hip fracture. The aim of this study was to evaluate how physical function two weeks after hip fracture operation predicts 12-month mortality. This was a prospective study of hip fracture patients with one-year follow-up, carried out in Jyväskylä Central Hospital in Finland. Methods: In this study, there were 243 consecutive community-dwelling patients aged 65 or older, who were able to walk before hip fracture. Two weeks after operation, information was gathered on pre-fracture activities of daily living (ADLs) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs). Patients’ ability to stand up, sit down and walk was assessed. The follow-up lasted 12 months. Results: The best predictor for mortality after one year was inability to stand up, hazard ratio (HR) 4.64 (95% CI 2.11–10.18, p<0.001). The corresponding HRs concerning inability to sit down were 4.52 (95% CI 2.10–9.72, p<0.001), inability to walk 2.39 (95% CI 1.20–4.78, p=0.013), ADL score 1.43 (95% CI 1.16–1.76, p=0.001) and IADL score 1.19 (95% CI 1.03–1.38, p=0.017). These variables were age- and sex-adjusted. According to the multiple proportional hazard model there was only one variable with statistical significance, i.e., the pre-fracture ADL-score (p=0.025). Conclusion: Inability to stand up, sit down or walk two weeks after operation were the strongest predictors for mortality among operated hip fracture patients. We suggest that focus should be directed to verify if better survival might be achieved by more intensive rehabilitation immediately after the operation. The pre-fracture ADL-score appeared to be the only variable reaching statistical significance in the multiple proportional hazard model. This fact may reflect frailty and affect decisions concerning the rehabilitation program.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marottoli RA, Berkman LF, Cooney LM. Decline in physical function following hip fracture. J Am Geriatr Soc 1992; 40: 861–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Folman Y, Gepstein R, Assart A, Liberty S. Functional recovery after operative treatment of femoral neck fractures in an institutionalized elderly population. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 454–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Broos PLO, Van Haaften KIK, Stappaerst KH, Gruwez J.A. Hip fractures in elderly. Mortality, functional results and social readaptation. Int Surg 1989; 74: 191–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Finsen V, Borset M, Rossvoll I. Mobility, survival and nursing-home requirements after hip fracture. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1995; 84: 291–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Holmberg S. Agger E. Ersmark H. Rehabilitation at home after hip fracture. Acta Orthop Scand 1989; 60: 73–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Aharonoff GB, Koval KJ, Skovron Ml, Zuckerman JD. Hip fractures in the elderly: predictors of one year mortality. J Orthop Trauma 1997; 11: 162–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gree M, Colin L, Soscolne CL, Belseck E, et al. Mortality and institutionalization following hip fracture. J Am Geriatr Soc 2000; 48: 283–8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Holmberg S, Conradi P, Ragnar K, Thorngren K-G. Mortality after cervical hip fracture. Acta Orthop Scand 1986; 57: 8–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Meyer HE. Trevdal A. Falch JA. Pedersen JI. Factors associated with mortality after hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 2000; 11: 228–32.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Imura K, Ishii Y, Yagisawa K, Matsueda M. Postoperative ambulatory level after hip fracture in the elderly predicts survival rate. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2000; 120: 369–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fox KM, Hawkes WG, Hebel JR, et al. Mobility after hip fracture predicts health outcomes. J Am Geriatr Soc 1998; 46: 169–73.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Huusko TM, Karppi P, Avikainen V, Kautiainen H, Sulkava R. Intensive geriatric rehabilitation of hip fracture patients. Acta Orthop Scand 2002; 73: 425–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Huusko TM, Karppi P, Avikainen V, Kautiainen H, Sulkava R. Randomised, clinical trial of intensive geriatric rehabilitation in patients with hip fracture: subgroup analysis of patients with dementia. BMJ 2000; 321: 1107–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW. Studies of illness in the aged. The index of ADL: a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA 1963; 185: 914–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Katz S, Downs TD, Cash HR, Grotz RC. Progress in the development of index of ADL. Gerontologist 1970; 1: 20–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 1969; 9: 179–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, Mchugh PR. Mini-Mental State: A practical method for grading the cognitive stage of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12: 189–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Galvard H, Elmstahl S, Elmstahl B, Samuelsson SM, Roberts-son E. Differences in body composition between female geriatric hip fracture patients and healthy controls: body fat is more important as explanatory factor for the fracture than body weight and lean body mass. Aging Clin Exp Res 1996; 8: 282–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Jette AM, Harris BA, Cleary PD, Campion EW. Functional recovery after hip fracture. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1987; 68: 735–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Magaziner J, Simonsick EM, Kashner TM, Hebel JR, Kenzora JE. Predictors of functional recovery one year following hospital discharge for hip fracture: a prospective study. J Gerontol 1990; 3: M101–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Covinsky KE, Palmer RM, Counsell SR, Pine ZM, Walter LC, Chren M-M. Functional status before hospitalization in acutely ill older adults: validity and clinical importance of retrospective reports. J Am Geriatr Soc 2000; 48: 164–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mossey JM, Mutran E, Knott K, Craik R. Determinants of recovery12 months after hip fracture: the importance of psychosocial factors. Am J Public Health 1989; 79: 279–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Johansson C, Skoog I. A population-based study on the association between dementia and hip fractures in 85-year olds. Aging Clin Exp Res 1996; 8: 189–96.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Schwab M, Roder F, Aleker T, et al. Psychotropic drug use, falls and hip fracture in the elderly. Aging Clin Exp Res 2000; 12; 234–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physiotherapy, Jyväskylä Central Hospital, 40930, Kinkomaa, Finland

    Maarit Heinonen M.Sc

  2. Department of Rehabilitation and Geriatrics, Jyväskylä Central Hospital, Finland

    Pertti Karppi

  3. Puolarmetsä Hospital, Espoo

    Tiina Huusko

  4. Rheumatism Foundation Hospital, Heinola

    Hannu Kautiainen

  5. Department of Public Health and General Practice, University of Kuopio, Finland

    Raimo Sulkava

Authors
  1. Maarit Heinonen M.Sc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pertti Karppi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tiina Huusko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hannu Kautiainen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Raimo Sulkava
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maarit Heinonen M.Sc.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heinonen, M., Karppi, P., Huusko, T. et al. Post-operative degree of mobilization at two weeks predicts one-year mortality after hip fracture. Aging Clin Exp Res 16, 476–480 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03327405

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03327405

Keywords

Search

Navigation