Skip to main content
Log in

The nature of pedagogic teacher-student interactions: A phenomenographic study

  • Published:
The Australian Educational Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Globally, teaching has become more complex and more challenging over recent years, with new and increased demands being placed on teachers by students, their families, governments and wider society. Teachers work with more diverse communities in times characterised by volatility, uncertainty and moral ambiguity. Societal, political, economic and cultural shifts have transformed the contexts in which teachers work and have redefined the ways in which teachers interact with students. This qualitative study uses phenomenographic methods to explore the nature of pedagogic teacherstudent interactions. The data analysis reveals five qualitatively different ways in which teachers experience pedagogic engagements with students. The resultant categories of description ranged from information providing, with teachers viewed as transmitters of a body of knowledge through to mentoring in which teachers were perceived as significant others in the lives of students with their influence extending beyond the walls of the classroom and beyond the years of schooling. The paper concludes by arguing that if teachers are to prepare students for the challenges and opportunities in changing times, teacher education programs need to consider ways to facilitate the development of mentoring capacities in new teachers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akerlind, G. S. (2002, November).Academic’s awareness of their own growth and development: Five dimensions of variation. Paper presented at the Symposium on Current Issues in Phenomenography, Canberra.

  • Ashworth, P., & Lucas, U. (1998). What is the “World” of phenomenography?Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 42(4), 415–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, S. (1997). On phenomenography, learning and teaching.Higher Education Research and Development, 16(2), 135–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulton-Lewis, G. M., Marton, F., Lewis, D. C., & Wilss, L. A. (2001). A longitudinal study of learning for a group of indigenous Australian university students: Dissonant conceptions and strategies.Higher Education, 47, 91–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowden, J. A. (2000). The nature of phenomenographic research. In J. A. Bowden & E. Walsh (Eds.),Phenomenography. Melbourne: RMIT University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, V. (2006).Rethinking Middle years: Early adolescents, schooling and digital culture. Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling, N., Hamilton, S. F., & Shaver, K. H. (2003). Relationships outside the family: Unrelated adults. In G. R. Adams & M. D. Berzonsky (Eds.),Blackwell handbook of adolescence (pp. 349–370). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBolt, G. P. (1992).Teacher induction and mentoring: School-based collaborative programs. Albany, NY: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Queensland. (2002).A guide to productive pedagogies: Classroom reflection manual. Brisbane, Australia: Queensland Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser. B. J., & Wahlberg, H. J. (2005). Research on teacher-student relationships and learning environments: Context, retrospect and prospect.International Journal of Educational Research, 43(1–2), 102–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried, R. J. (2001).The passionate teacher: A practical guide (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A. (2000). Mixed emotions: Teachers’ perceptions of their interactions with students.Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(8), 811–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2000). Mentoring in the new millennium.Theory into Practice, 39(1), 50–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L. R. (2008). A phenomenographic investigation of teacher conceptions of student engagement in learning.The Australian Educational Researcher 35(1), 57–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasselgren, B., & Beach, D. (1997). Phenomenography: A “good for nothing brother” of phenomenology? Outline of an analysis.Higher Education Research and Development, 16(2), 191–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Killen, R. (2007).Effective teaching strategies: Lessons from research and practice (4th Ed.). South Melbourne, VIC.: Thomson Social Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (1991). Situated learning in communities of practice. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine & S. D. Teasley (Eds.),Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 63–82). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, D., & Gordon, P. (1993).Dictionary of education. London: Hodder and Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, R., Ladwig, J., Luke, A., Mills, M., Hayes, D., & Gore, J. (2001).The Queensland school reform longitudinal study: Final report (Research report). Brisbane: Education Queensland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, R., Martino, W., Mills, M., & Bahr, M. (2002).Addressing the educational needs of boys: Strategies for schools and teachers (Research report). Canberra: Department of Science, Education and Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, R., Mills, M., & Hayes, D. (2000). Teachers, school reform and social justice: Challenging research and practice.Australian Educational Researcher, 27(3), 99–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovat, T. J., & MacKenzie, C. (2003).The role of the ‘teacher’: Coming of age? [Discussion paper]. Bundoora, Australia: The Australian Council of Deans of Education Incorporated.

  • Marton, F. (1986). Phenomenography: A research approach to investigating different understandings of reality.Journal of Thought, 21(3), 28–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F. (1988). Phenomenography: Exploring different conceptions of reality. In D. Fetterman (Ed.),Qualitative approaches to evaluation in education: The silent revolution (pp. 176–208). NY: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997).Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., & Pang, M. F. (1999, August).Two faces of variation. Paper presented at the 8th European conference for learning and instruction, Goteborg University, Goteborg, Sweden.

  • Metcalfe, A. & Game, A. (2008). The teacher’s enthusiasm.Australian Educational Researcher, 33(3), 91–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, F. J., & Associates. (1996).Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2005).Teachers matter: Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers. Paris: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterman, K. F. (2000). Students’ need for belonging in the school community.Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 323–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswald, M., Johnson, B., & Howard, S. (2003). Quantifying and evaluating resiliencepromoting factors: Teachers’ beliefs and perceived roles.Research in Education, 70, 50–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottewill, R. M. (2003). What’s wrong with instrumental learning? The case of business and management.Education and Training, 45(4/5), 189–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulson, J., & Fouts, G. (2001). Facilitating academic achievement through affect attunement in the classroom.Journal of Educational Research, 94(3), 185–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prosser, M. (2000). Using phenomenographic research methodology in the context of research in teaching and learning. In J. A. Bowden & E. Walsh (Eds.),Phenomenography (pp. 34–47). Melbourne, Australia: RMIT University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prosser, M., Trigwell, K., & Taylor, P. (1994). A phenomenographic study of academics’ conceptions of science learning and teaching.Learning and Instruction, 4, 217–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. T. E. (1999). The concept and methods of phenomenographic research.Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 53–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B., Turkanis, C., & Bartlett, L. (Eds.). (2001).Learning together: Children and adults in a school community. NY: Oxford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, K. J. (2000, August).“Problems” in the education of boys and exploring “real” effects from evidence-based research: Useful findings in teaching and learning for boys and girls. Paper presented at the Teaching Boys Developing Fine Men Conference, Carlton Crest Hotel, Brisbane, Australia.

  • Rowe, K. J., & Rowe, K. S. (2000).Inquiry into the education of boys. [Submission to the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Employment, Education and Workplace relations]. Canberra, Australia.

  • Samuelowicz, J. (1999). Academics’ educational beliefs and teaching practices. Unpublished PhD thesis, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.

  • Sandberg, J. (2000). Understanding human competence at work: An interpretive approach.Academy of Management Journal, 43(1), 9–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, L. (1997). Theoretical foundations of phenomenography.Higher Education Research and Development, 16(2), 159–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trepanier-Street, M. (2004/2005). Teachers: Mentors of children.Childhood Education, 81(2), 66–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigwell, K. (2000). A phenomenographic interview on phenomenography. In J. Bowden & E. Walsh (Eds.),Phenomenography (pp. 47–61). Melbourne, Australia: RMIT University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wentzel, K. R. (1997). Student motivation in middle school: The role of perceived pedagogical caring.Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 411–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wentzel, K. R. (2002). Are effective teachers like good parents? Teaching styles and student adjustment in early adolescence.Child Development, 73(1), 287–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beutel, D. The nature of pedagogic teacher-student interactions: A phenomenographic study. Aust. Educ. Res. 37, 77–91 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216923

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216923

Keywords

Navigation