Skip to main content
Log in

“We’ve been wastin’ a whole million watchin’ her doin’ her shoes” situated practice within a pedagogy of multiliteracies

  • Published:
The Australian Educational Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Communication in society today is characterised by rapidly changing and emergent forms of meaning-making in a context of increased cultural and linguistic diversity. The need to teach these new literacy practices referred to as multiliteracies, is now embedded within systemic policies in Australia. This research paper is a response to these imperatives, releasing key findings of a critical ethnographic study concerning interactions between pedagogy and access to multiliteracies among culturally and linguistically diverse learners. A salient finding was that situated practice was enacted as an isolated stage rather than occurring concurrently with overt instruction. This had significant connections to some learners’ inability to access new, multimodal, and digitally-mediated designs of meaning. More importantly, culturally and linguistically non-students who were not of the dominant culture were least served by the separation of overt instruction and situated practice. The article concludes with the recommendation that multimodal meaning-making requires an instructional model that involves both practice and instruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anstey, M & G. Bull (2004)The Literacy Labyrinth, 2 nd Edition, Pearson, Frenchs Forest, NSW

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A., D. Ash, M. Rutherford, K. Nakagawa, A. Gordon & J. mpione (1993) Distributed expertise in the classroom, in G. Salomon, ed.,Distributed Cognitions: Psychological and Educational Considerations, pp.188–228, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. & J. Campione (1994) Guided discovery in a community of learners, in G. Salomon, ed.,Distributed Cognitions: Psychological and Educational Considerations, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. (2005) Learning communities and the nature of teacher participation in a learning community,Literacy Learning: the Middle Years, vol. 13, no. 2, pp.8–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carspecken, P. (1996)Critical Ethnography in Educational Research: A theoretical and practical guide, Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carspecken, P. (2001) Critical ethnographies from Houston: Distinctive features and directions, in P. Carspecken & G. Walford, eds.,Critical Ethnography and Education, vol. 5, pp.1–26, Elsevier Science, Oxford, UK.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carspecken, P. & G. Walford, eds. (2001)Critical Ethnography and Education, vol. 5, Elsevier Science, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cazden, C. (1988)Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning, Heinemann, Portsmouth, NH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1966)Democracy and Education, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. (1992)The Social Mind: Language, ideology and social practice, Bergin and Garvey, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. (2000a) Discourse and sociocultural studies in reading, in M. Kamil, P. Mosenthai, P. Pearson & R. Barr, eds.,Handbook of Reading Research, vol. 3, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. (2000b) New people in new worlds: Networks, the new capitalism and schools, in B. Cope & M. Kalantzis, eds.,Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures, pp.43–68, Macmillan, South Yarra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, S. (1999) Literacy and social practice, in D. Wagner, R. Venezky & B. Street, eds.,Literacy: An International Handbook, Westview Press, Boulder, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalantzis, M. & B. Cope (2000) A multiliteracies pedagogy: A pedagogical supplement, in B. Cope & M. Kalantzis, eds.,Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures, pp.239–248, Macmillan, South Yarra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalantzis, M. & B. Cope, eds. (2005)Learning by Design, Victorian Schools Innovation Commission and Common Ground, Melbourne, Vic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalantzis, M., B. Cope & H. Fehring (2002) Multiliteracies: Teaching and learning in the new communications environment,Primary English Notes, vol. 133, pp.1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (2003)Literacy in the New Media Age, Routledge, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (1988)Cognition in Practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (1996) Teaching as learning in practice,Mind, Culture and Activity, vol. 3, pp.149–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. & E. Wenger (1991)Situated Learning: Legitimate peripheral participation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo Bianco, J. (2000) Multiliteracies and multilingualism, in B. Cope & M. Kalantzis, eds.,Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures, pp.92–105, Macmillan, South Yarra.

    Google Scholar 

  • New London Group (1996) A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures,Harvard Educational Review, vol. 66, no. 1, pp.60–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • New London Group (2000) A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures, in B. Cope & M. Kalantzis, eds.,Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures, pp.9–38, Macmillan, South Yarra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Queensland Studies Authority (2002)Queensland Year 5 Test in Aspects of Literacy and Numeracy, Queensland Government, Brisbane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. & J. Lave (1990)Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive development in social context, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seixas, P. (1993) The community of inquiry as a basis for knowledge and learning: The case of history,American Educational Research Journal, vol. 30, no. 2, pp.305–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, B. (1995)Social Literacies: Critical approaches to literacy in development, ethnography and education, Longman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unsworth, L. (2001)Teaching Multiliteracies Across the Curriculum, Open University Press, Buckingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1962)Thought and Language, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1978)Mind in Society: The development of higher psychological processes, Harvard University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1987)Problems of General Psychology: Including the volume thinking and speech, vol. 1, State University of New York, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. (1985)Culture, Communication and Cognition: Vygotskian perspectives, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D., J.S. Bruner & G. Ross (1976) The role of tutoring in problem solving,Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, vol. 17, pp.89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mills, K.A. “We’ve been wastin’ a whole million watchin’ her doin’ her shoes” situated practice within a pedagogy of multiliteracies. Aust. Educ. Res. 33, 13–32 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216840

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216840

Keywords

Navigation