Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Tracking the nomadic life of the educational researcher: What future for feminist public intellectuals and the performative university?

  • Published:
The Australian Educational Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Is the idea of the liberal university dead, has the postmodern university any chance of being emancipatory, has the theory-practice divide merely collapsed in an era of ‘new knowledge work’, or has the university just become one aspect of market states and global capitalism? Knowledge-based economies locate universities as central to the commodification and management of knowledge, while at the same time the legitimacy of the university and the academic as knowledge producers is challenged by postmodernist, feminist, post-colonial and indigenous claims within a wider trend towards the ‘democratisation of knowledge’ and a new educational instrumentalism and opportunism. What becomes of the educational researcher, and indeed their professional organisations, in this changing socio-political and economic scenario? Is our role one of policy service, policy critique, technical expert or public intellectual? In particular what place is there for feminist public intellectuals in a so-called era of postfeminism and public-private convergence? The paper draws on feminist and critical perspectives to mount a case for the importance of the public intellectual in the performative postmodern university.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, M. and T. Castleman (2001) Fighting the pipeline fallacy, in A. Brooks and A. McKinnon, eds.,Gender and the Restructured University: Changing Management and Culture in Higher Education, Open University Press, Buckingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, C. (2001) Research report,NTEU Advocate, September, pp. 8–9.

  • Association of Australian Philosophers (2001)Submission to the Senate Committee on the Adequacy of Funding for Higher Education, DEST, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, E. (2000a) Critical dissonance and critical schizophrenia: the struggle between policy delivery and policy critique,Research Intelligence, vol. 73, pp. 14–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, E. (2000b) In defence of ideas, or why ‘what works’ is not enough,British Journal of Sociology, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 318–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Association of Research in Education (2002)Submission to Crossroads Review of Higher Education, available at http://www.aare.edu.au

  • Bacchi, C. (2001) Managing equity: mainstreaming and diversity in Australian universities, in A. Brooks and A. McKinnon, eds.,Gender and the Restructured University: Changing Management and Culture in Higher Education, Open University Press, Buckingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. (2000) Performativities and fabrications in the education economy: towards a performative society?Australian Educational Researcher, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. (1997)Higher Education: A Critical Business, Open University Press, Buckingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. and A. Griffin, eds. (1997)The End of Knowledge in Higher Education, Cassell, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batterham, R. (2000)The Chance to Change: Discussion paper by the Chief Scientist, viewed 25 August 2000, available at http://www.isr.gov.au/science/review/thechance.html

  • Baudrillard, J. (1983)In the Shadow of the Silent Majorities —or, The End of the Social, trans. P. Foss, P. Patton and J. Johnston, Semiotext(e), New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1992)A Risk Society, Polity Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessant, B. and A. Holbrook (1995)Reflections on Educational Research in Australia: A history of AARE, AARE and Coldstream Press, Coldstream.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, J. (2000) Gender and education policy in the context of globalisation, in N. Burbules and C. Torres, eds.Globalisation and Education: Issues: Critical Perspectives, Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, J. (2001) Universities in crisis? Knowledge economies, emancipatory pedagogies and the critical intellectual,Educational Theory, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 353–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, J. (2002) Is it only ‘what works’ that ‘counts’ in new knowledge economies? The trend towards evidence-based practice and its implications for educational research and teacher education in Australia,Social Theory and Policy, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 257–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, J. and J. Sachs (2001) Women leaders in the restructured university, in A. Brooks and A. McKinnon, eds.,Gender and the Restructured University: Changing Management and Culture in Higher Education, Open University Press, Buckingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, J. and J. Sachs (2000) Paradoxes of leadership and management in higher education: some Australian reflections,International Journal of Leadership in Education, vol. 3, no. 1, pp.1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, J. and J. Sachs (2003) Managing gender equity in the performative university,Australian Feminist Studies, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, J. and S. Thorpe (in press) Media/ting change: the role of print-based media in school reform in Victoria, Australia,Journal of Education Policy.

  • Bloland, H. (1995) Postmodernism and higher education,Journal of Higher Education, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 521–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1996)On Television, The New Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. and L. Wacquant (1992)An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brint, S. (1994)In an Age of Experts: The Changing Role of Professionals in Politics and Public Life, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Educational Research Association (2001) Proposal for a national forum for educational development of teachers, politicians and researchers which informs parliamentary debate and public discussion,Research Intelligence, vol. 73, pp. 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunda, T. and G. McConville (2002) Indigenous higher education: myths, cuts and obvious decline,Campus Review, May, pp. 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calas, M. and L. Smircich (2001) Introduction: does the house of knowledge have a door?Organisation, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 147–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chifley Research Centre (2001)Report of the Knowledge Nation Task Force, Chifley Research Centre, Canberra, available at http://www.alp.org.au/kn/

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H. (2000) What’s going on? Black feminist thought and the politics of postmodernism, in E. St Pierre and W. Pillow, eds.,Working the Ruins: Feminist Post-Structural Theory and Methods in Education, Routledge, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, J. and B. Thiele (2001) Globalisation and gendered work cultures in universities, in A. Brooks and A. McKinnon, eds.,Gender and the Restructured University: Changing Management and Culture in Higher Education, Open University Press, Buckingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delanty, G. (2001) The university in the knowledge society,Organisation, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 149–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs (DETYA) (1999)New Knowledge, New Opportunities: A Discussion Paper on Higher Education Research and Research Training, CGPS, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • DETYA (2001a)Backing Australia’s Ability, CGPS, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • DETYA (2001b)The Impact of Educational Research on Policy and Practice, CGPS, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fendler, L. (1999) Making trouble: prediction, agency and critical intellectuals, in T. Popkewitz and L. Fendler, eds.,Changing Terrains of Knowledge and Politics, Routledge, New York and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (1997)Justice Interruptus, Polity Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoare, Q. and G. Nowell Smith, eds. (1971)Selection from Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci, Lawrence and Wishart, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, M. (1997) The connection between research and practice,Educational Researcher, vol. 26, no. 7, October, pp. 4–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B. and F. Rizvi (1997) The OECD and Australian education, in J. Currie and J. Newsom, eds.,Universities and Globalisation: Critical Perspectives, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J.-F. (1984)The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, Manchester University Press, Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S., ed. (2001)Investment in Social Capital: Postgraduate Training in the Social Sciences in Australia, Academy of the Social Sciences, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. and M. Consindine (2001)The Enterprise University: Power, Governance and Reinvention in Australia, Cambridge University Press, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNay, L. (2000)Gender and Agency: Reconfiguring the Subject in Feminist and Social Theory, Polity Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliam, E. (2000) Laughing within reason: on pleasure, women and academic performance, in E. St Pierre and W. Pillow, eds.,Working the Ruins: Feminist Poststructural Theory and Methods in Education, Routledge, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty, C. (1989) On race and voice: challenges for liberal education in the 1990’s,Cultural Critique, no. 14, Winter, pp. 179–208.

  • Moreton-Robinson, A. (2000)Talkin’ up to the White Woman: Indigenous Women and Feminism, University of Queensland Press, St Lucia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morley, L. (2001) Subjected to review: engendering quality and power in higher education. Paper presented at the Third International Gender and Education Conference, University of London. London, July.

  • Nelson, B. (2002)Higher Education at the Crossroads: An Overview Paper, Department of Education, Science and Technology, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (1998) Public philosophy and international feminism,Ethics, vol. 108, pp. 770–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, G. and S. Slaughter (1998) Academic capitalism, managed professionals and supply-side higher education, in M. Randy, ed.,Chalklines: The Politics of Work in the Managed University, Duke University Press, Durham and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. (2001) The public role of writers and intellectuals, Deakin Lectures, ABC National, May, available at http://www.abc.net.au/rn/deakin/stories/s299210.htm

  • Scott, P. (1997) The crisis of knowledge and the massification of higher education, in R. Barnett and A. Griffin, eds. (1997)The End of Knowledge in Higher Education, Cassell, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheehan, P. and M. Poole (2002) Asserting the value of the social science and humanities to Australia’s future,Dialogue, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 56–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siraj-Blatchford, I. (1995) Critical social research and the academy: the role of organic intellectuals in educational research,British Journal of Sociology of Education, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 205–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S. and J. Leslie (1998)Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policy and the Entrepreneurial University, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strathern, M., ed. (2000)Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A. (1996) Education for democracy: assimilation or emancipation for Aboriginal Australians,Comparative Education Review, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 426–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, P. (2002) Poverty, education and Radio Gaga: the politics of evidence. Paper presented at the European Conference on Educational Research. Lisbon, 11–14 September.

  • Tsolidis, G. (1996) Where have all the banners gone? Teaching to a feminist politics within the academy,Discourse, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 271–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vidovich, L. and J. Currie (1998)Universities and Globalisation: Critical Perspectives, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, I. et al. (1996)Open the Social Sciences: Report of the Gulbenkian Commission on the Restructuring of the Social Sciences, Stanford University Press, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willinsky, J. (2002) Democracy and education: the missing link may be ours,Harvard Educational Review, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 367–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willinsky, J. (2000) Strategic education research: the public value of research,Educational Researcher, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wortham, S. (1999)Rethinking the University: Leverage and Deconstruction, Manchester University Press, Manchester and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeatman, A. (1998)Activism in the Policy Process, Allen and Unwin, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blackmore, J. Tracking the nomadic life of the educational researcher: What future for feminist public intellectuals and the performative university?. Aust. Educ. Res. 30, 1–24 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216795

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216795

Keywords

Navigation