Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring willingness-to-pay for wetlands preservation with the contingent valuation method

  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Preservation of bottomland hardwood forest wetlands is threatened by pressure from surface coal mining activities in the western Kentucky coalfield. The contingent valuation, survey method was used to measure the economic benefits (willingness-to-pay) of preserving the Clear Creek wetland, the largest wetland area in the coalfield, from surface coal mining. Results indicated that Kentucky households are willing to pay between $6 and $13, in the form of voluntary contributions to a hypothetical “Wetland Preservation Fund,” for preservation. Mine reclamation as a substitute for preservation recreational use of wetlands by survey respondents, conservation club membership, and age are determinants of willingness-to-pay. Annual aggregate benefits of Clear Creek wetland preservation are estimated to be between $2.94 million and $19 million depending on aggregation assumptions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Amemiya, T. 1981. Qualitative response models: a survey. Journal of Economic Literature XIX:1493–1536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowker, J.M. and J.R. Stoll. 1988. Use of dichotomous choice nonmarket methods to value the whooping crane resource. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70:372–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, K.J. and R.C. Bishop. 1987. Valuing wildlife in benefit-cost analyses: a case study involving endangered species. Water Resources Research 23:943–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, T.A. 1988. A new paradigm for valuing non-market goods using referendum data. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 15:355–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, R.G., D.S. Brookshire, and W.D. Schulze. 1986. Valuing Environmental Goods: An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method. Rowman and Allanheld. Totowa, NJ, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, D.A. 1978. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farber, S. 1987. The value of coastal wetlands for protection of property against hurricane wind damage. Journal of Environmentla Economics and Management 14:143–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farber S. and R. Costanza. 1987. The economic value of wetlands systems. Journal of Environmental Management 24:41–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanemann, W.M. 1984. Welfare evaluation in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66:332–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, R.R., W.L. Fisher, C. Justis, and R.R. Cicerello. 1986. Wetland Protection Strategies for Kentucky. Kentucky Nature Preserves Commission, Frankfort, KY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources, Illinois Department of Conservation, Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Missouri Department of Conservation, and Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency. 1988. The New Madrid wetlands project: a component of the lower Mississippi Valley joint venture of the North American waterfowl management plan. In cooperation with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and other supporting agencies. Frankfort, KY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krutilla, J.V. 1967. Conservation reconsidered. American Economic Review 57:777–784.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitch, J.A. 1983. Progress, problems, and prospects for successful economic evaluation of wetlands. Wetlands 3:153–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell K.E. 1990. Models for referendum data: the structure of discrete choice models for contingent valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 18:19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R.C. and R.T. Carson. 1989. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch, W.J., J.R. Taylor, K.B. Benson, and P.L. Hill, Jr. 1983a. Wetlands and coal surface mining in western Kentucky—a regional impact assessment. Wetlands 3:161–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch, W.J., J.R. Taylor, K.B. Benson, and P.L. Hill, Jr. 1983b Atlas of Wetlands in the Principal coal Surface Mining Region of Western Kentucky. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Biological Services. Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Technology Assessment 1984. Wetlands: Their Use and Regulation. U.S. Congress, Washington, DC, USA.

  • Stoll, J.R. and J.C. Bergstrom. 1988. Contingent valuation of recreation benefits for Louisiana coastal wetlands: implications for valuing changes in a wetland area. Natural Resources Working Paper Series, Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudman, S. 1976. Applied Sampling. Academic Press, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service and U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 1982. 1980 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Kentucky, Center for Business and Economic Research, 1988. Kentucky Statistical Abstract. Lexington, KY, USA.

  • Whitehead, J.C. 1989. The effect of substitutes on existence value and nature preservation in benefit cost analysis. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Whitehead, J.C. Measuring willingness-to-pay for wetlands preservation with the contingent valuation method. Wetlands 10, 187–201 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03160832

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03160832

Key Words

Navigation