Abstract
We consider a nonstationary time series that is composed of a stationary and nonstationary component. Monte Carlo experiments show that common unit root tests have probabilities of committing a type I error that significantly exceed the level of significance. We find that the probabilities vary according to the relative size of the nonstationary component.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beveridge, S. and C.R. Nelson, (1981), A New Approach to Decomposition of Economic Time Series into Permanent and Temporary Components with Particular Attention to Measurement of the “Business Cycle”, J. Monetary Econ. 7, 151–74.
Cochrane, J.H., (1988), How Big Is the Random Walk in GNP?, J. Political Econ. 96, 893–920.
Dickey, D.A. and W.A. Fuller, 1979, Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series With a Unit Root, J. Amer. Stat. Assoc. 74, 427–31.
Handa, J. and B.K. Ma, 1989, Four Tests for the Random Walk Hypothesis: Power Versus Robustness, Econ. Letters 29, 141–145.
Phillips, P.C.B., 1987, Time Series Regression with a Unit Root, Econometrica 55, 277–301.
Phillips, P.C.B. and P. Perron, 1988, Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression, Biometrika 75, 335–46.
Said, S.E., and D.A. Dickey, 1984, Testing for Unit Roots in Autoregressive-Moving Average Models of Unknown Order, Biometrika 71, 599–607.
Sargan, J.D. and A. Bhargava, 1983, Testing Residuals from Least Squares Regression for Being Generated by the Gaussian Random Walk, Econometrica 51, 153–74.
Schwert, G.W., 1989, Tests for Unit Roots: A Monte Carlo Investigation, J. of Econ. and Bus. Stat. 7, 147–159.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, P.C., Praschnik, J. The size of the nonstationary component and its effect on tests for unit roots. Statistical Papers 34, 83–88 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02925529
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02925529