Abstract
A crucial assumption of discrete choice models requires that observed individual behavior is a direct function of unobserved individual utility maximization. There are situations, however, where observed behavior is ambiguous with respect to maximum utility. This is the case, when individual utility maximization is hampered by global restrictions of action. Typically, such restrictions are tied to particular decision alternatives, which causes an asymmetric influencing on individual behavior. The existence of global asymmetric restrictions upon individual behavior can be treated as a second unobserved variable. This leads to two separate models, which have to be estimated simultaneously: a decision model on the one hand and a restriction model on the other. The standard decision model arises as a special case with a zero restriction probability. McKelvey/Zavoina's PseudoR 2 can be employed as a straightforward evaluation of the goodness-of-fit. Neglecting the presence of asymmetric restrictions or considering them as symmetric effects leads to biased estimators. This is discussed in a formal manner and demonstrated by means of a simulation study. The bias may occur in either direction. It is not only restricted to the model parameters themselves, but also to their standard errors. To avoid such bias, it seems advisable to use the extended model if ever possible and test for a zero restriction probability.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abowd J M, Farber H S (1982) Job Queues and the Union Status of Workers, Indust Lab Relat Rev 35: 354–367
Amemiya T (1985) Advanced Econometrics, Basil Blackwell, Oxford
Bird E J (1990) Nonparametric Conditional Density Estimation: Overview and Applications, Sfb 3 Working Paper No. 327, Frankfurt/Main-Mannheim
Blundell R (1990) Unemployment and the Labour Supply of Married Women, König H. (Ed.): Economics of Wage Determination. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York-London-Paris-Tokyo-Hongkong, 273–293
Blundell R, Ham J, Meghir C (1987) Unemployment and Female Labour Supply, Ec Journal 97: 44–64
Börsch-Supan A, Pfeiffer F (1992): Determinanten der Selbständigkeit in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Hujer R, Schneider H, Zapf W (Eds.) Herausforderungen an den Wohlfahrtsstaat im strukturellen Wandel, Frankfurt/Main-New York, Campus, 257–287
Butler J S, Moffitt R (1982) A Computationally Efficient Quadrature Procedure for the One-Factor Multinomial Probit Model, Econometrica 50: 761–764
Cragg J G (1971) Some Statistical Models for Limited Dependent Variables With Application to the Demand for Durable Goods, Econometrica 39: 829–844
Greene W H, Econometric Analysis, New York, London, MacMillan Publishing Company
Hujer R (1982) Ökonometrische Methoden zur Analyse struktureller Ungleichgewichte, Wisu 11: 158–168
Johnson N L, Kotz S (1969) Distributions in Statistics: Discrete Distributions, Wiley, New York
Jones A M (1989) A Double-Hurdle Model of Cigarette Consumption, J Appl Econometrics 4: 23–39
Licht G, Steiner V (1991) Abgang aus der Arbeitslosigkeit, Individualeffekte und Hysteresis im Konjunkturaufschwung, Helberger C, Bellman L, Blaschke D (Eds.) Erwerbstätigkeits- und Arbeitslosigkeitsanalyse auf der Grundlage des Sozio-ökonomischen Panels, Nürnberg, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung
Maddala G S (1983) Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge-London-New York-New Rochelle-Melbourne-Sydney
Maier G, Weiss P (1990) Modelle diskreter Entscheidungen—Theorie und Anwendung in den Sozial- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Springer, Wien-New York
McKelvey R D, Zavoina W (1975) A Statistical Model for the Analysis of Ordinal Level Dependent Variables, J Math Sociology 4: 103–120
Merz J (1992) Zur Dynamik markt- und nichtmarktmäßiger Aktivitäten: Zeitverwendung verheirateter Frauen in Beruf und Haushalt—Eine Panelanalyse, Hujer R, Schneider H, Zapf W (Eds.) Herausforderungen an den Wohlfahrtsstaat im strukturellen Wandel, Frankfurt/Main-New York, Campus, 343–378
Mullahey J. (1986) Specification and Testing of Some Modified Count Data Models, J Econometrics 33: 341–365
Poirier D J (1980) Partial Observability in Bivariate Probit Models, J Econometrics 12: 209–217
Ronning G (1991) Mikroökonometrie, Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York-London-Paris-Tokyo-Hong Kong-Barcelona
Rouwendaal J (1990) On Discrete Choice Under Uncertainty: A Generalization of the Logit Model and Application, Manuscript
Schneider H (1991) Considering Global Market Rigidities in Econometric Models of Discrete Choice, Manuscript
Schneider H (1992) The Estimation of a Bivariate Random Effects Probit Model With Ambiguous Zero State, Manuscript
Stobernack M (1990) Die Bedeutung der Arbeitslosenversicherung für Erwerbslosigkeit und Arbeitsangebot—Eine mikroökonomische Betrachtung, Campus, Frankfurt/Main-New York
Veall M R, Zimmermann K F (1992) Evaluating Pseudo-R 2's for Binary Probit Models, to appear in Qualitiy & Quantity, Int J Meth
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I wish to thank Reinhard Hujer, Jo Grammig, Matthias Lob, Notburga Ott, Reinhold Schnabel and an anonymous referee for helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schneider, H. Binary discrete choice under asymmetric restrictions. Statistical Papers 34, 43–57 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02925526
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02925526