Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A management framework for program development techniques

Symposium on ID models—4

  • Articles
  • Symposium On ID Models: Introduction
  • Published:
Journal of instructional development

Abstract

Believing that most ID system approach models merely describewhat should be done, but recognizing that ID techniques do provide operational directions for accomplishing tasks implied by those models, the author describes an ID approach model for organizing ID techniques. He categorizes a sampling of techniques according to the defined functions of the model, then identifies the techniques by name, purpose, and literature references.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • A. B. Dick.Creative use of invisible printing. (A. B. Dick, 5700 W. Touhy Ave., Chicago, 60648) 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahauja, H. N.Constructor performance control by network. New York: John Wiley, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, D. W., & Pyan, K. A.Microteaching. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. S., Hastings, J. T., & Madaus, G. F.Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York: McGraw Hill, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeCecco, J.The psychology of learning and instruction: Educational psychology. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delbecq, A. L., Van de Ven, A. H., & Gustafson, D. H.Group techniques for program planning. Glenview, Ill.: Scott, Foresman, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dessler, G.Management fundamentals: A framework. Reston, Va.: Reston Publishing, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doohes, M. J., & Marquis, V.Rating employee and supervising performance. New York: American Management Association, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duperrin, J. C., & Godet, M. SMIC 74: A method for constructing and ranking scenarios.Futures, 1975, 7(4), 30–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellul, J.The technological society. New York: Vintage Books, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farace, R. V., Monge, P. R., & Russel, H. M.Communicating and organizing. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisch, A. L. The trigger film techniques.Improving College and University Teaching, 1970, 20(4), 286–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitz-Gibbon, C. T., & Morris, L. L.How to design a program evaluation. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagne, R. M.Task analysis—Its relationship to context analysis. Paper presented at AERA, Chicago, April 1974. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 092 588).

  • Gentry, C.Criteria for rejecting clients. Unpublished paper, January 1979.

  • Gentry, C. G.Outline for sequencing and clustering of objectives. Unpublished paper used in ID classes, 1976.

  • Goldman, R. M. Uses for the conference telephone in classroom instruction.Educational Technology, 1978,18, 42–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, T. A.Cost-effectiveness. New York: Praeger, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenblat, C. S., & Duke, R.Gaming—Simulation: Rationale, design and application. New York: Halsted Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunn, J., & Guy, C. Easy ways to help children think about the future.The Futurist, 1974,8(4), 186–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddock, T. Individualized instruction through student contracts.Arizona Teacher, 1967,55, 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmer, O.The use of the Delphi technique in problems of educational innovation. Santa Monica, Calif.: Rand Corporation, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, T. F., & Gentry, C. G. A foolproof personal filing system.Audiovisual Instruction, 1979,24(5), 40–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, R. E.How to write information mapping. Lexington, Mass.: Information Resources, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussain, K. M.Development of information systems for education. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. C.Design methods: Seeds of human future. London: Wiley Interscience, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judson, A. J.A manager’s guide to making changes. New York: Wiley, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, R. A.Educational system planning. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, J. E.Planning and producing audiovisual materials. San Francisco: Chandler, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klaus, D. J.Patterns of peer tutoring: Final report. Washington, D. C.: American Institute for Research in Behavioral Sciences, 1975. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 117 695)

    Google Scholar 

  • Klausmeirer, H. Research and development toward the improvement of education.Journal of Experimental Education, 37(1), 1968, 1–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koontz, H., & O’Donnel, C.Management: A book of readings. New York: McGraw Hill, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magaro, J. D. PPBS: A means towards accountability.Audiovisual Instruction, 1975,20(10), 10–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundal, M. E.Motion and time study: Principles and practices. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, A. F.Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative problem solving. New York: Scribner’s, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer, W. J., & Jones, J. E.A handbook of structured experiences for human relations training (Vol. 1). Iowa City: University Associated Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pool, I. de Sola.Trends in content analysis. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, G. J., & Strike, K. A. A categorization scheme for principles of sequencing content.Review of Educational Research, 1976,46(9), 665–689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priluch, H. M., & Hourihan, P. M.Practical CPM for construction. Duxbury, Mass.: Means Company, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzman, L., & Strauss, A. L.Field research. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schriber, T. J.Fundamentals of flowcharting. New York: John Wiley, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaplin, J. T., & Olds, H. F.Team Teaching. New York: Harper and Row, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. E.Evaluating the arts in education: A responsive approach. Columbus: Charles Merrill, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolovitch, H. D. The intermediate technology of learner verification and revision.Educational Technology, 1978,28(2), 13–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taba, H. Learning by discovery.Elementary School Journal, 1963,63(6), 308–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witkin, B. R. Needs assessment kits, models and tools.Educational Technology, 1977,17(11), 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witkin, B. R., & Stephens, K. G. Faulttree analysis: A research tool for educational planning.Technical Report 1. Hayward, Calif.: Alameda County PACE Center, October 1968. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 029 379)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittson, C. L., & Benschoter, R. Two-way television: Helping the medical center reach out.American Journal of Psychiatry, 1972,129(5), 624–677.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, J. R., & Henchey, S. P.Futurism in education. New York: Macmillan, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Michigan State University, 320 Erickson Hall, 48823, East Lansing, MI

    Castelle G. Gentry

Authors
  1. Castelle G. Gentry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gentry, C.G. A management framework for program development techniques. Journal of Instructional Development 4, 33–37 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02907489

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02907489

Keywords

Search

Navigation