Skip to main content
Log in

Individual neighborhood attachment and perceptions of neighborhood safety

  • Published:
American Journal of Criminal Justice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Macrostructural research in the social disorganization tradition assumes neighborhood structure dictates individual behavior. The current research explores the opposite perspective to determine whether individual attachment to the neighborhood influences perceptions of neighborhood safety. Using the Chicago Metropolitan Area Survey, the results show that loners, persons wishing to move, and renters perceive their neighborhoods as being less safe than attached residents. Implications for future research are offered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Austin, M. D., & Baba, Y. (1990). Social determinants of neighborhood attachment.Sociological Spectrum, 10, 59–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumer, T. (1985). Testing a general model of fear of crime: Data from a national sample.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 22, 239–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellair, P. E. (1997). Social interaction and community crime: Examining the importance of network structures.Criminology, 35, 677–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bursik, R. J., Jr.&, Grasmick, H. G. (1993).Neighborhoods and crime: The dimensions of effective community control. San Francisco: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiricos, T., Eschholz, S., & Gertz, M. (1997). Crime, news and fear of crime: Toward an identification of audience effects.Social Problems, 44, 342–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiricos, T., Hogan, M., & Gertz, M. (1997). Racial composition of neighborhood and fear of crime.Criminology, 35, 107–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, C. H. (1962).Social organization. New York: Schocken Books. (Original work published 1909).

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFronzo, J. (1996). Welfare and burglary.Crime and Delinquency, 42, 223–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Defronzo, J. (1997). Welfare and homicide.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34, 395–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fried, M. (1982). Residential attachment: Sources of residential and community satisfaction.Journal of Social Issues, 38, 107–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillis, A. R. & Hagan, J. (1982). Density, delinquency, and design: Formal and informal control and the built environment.Criminology, 19, 514–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, D. C., McNeil, R. J., III, &, Gottfredson, G. D. (1991). Social area influences on delinquency: A multilevel analysis.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 28, 197–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties.American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haggerty, L. J. (1982). Differential social contact in urban neighborhoods: Environmental vs. sociodemographic explanations.The Sociological Quarterly, 23, 359–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heitgard, J. L., & Bursik, Jr., R. J. (1987). Extracommunity dynamics and the ecology of delinquency.American Journal of Sociology, 92, 775–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houts, S., & Kassab, C. (1997). Rotter’s social learning theory and fear of crime: Differences by race and ethnicity.Social Science Quarterly, 78, 122–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krivo, L. J., & Peterson, R. D. (1996). Extremely disadvantaged neighborhoods and urban crime.Social Forces, 75, 619–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavrakas, P. J., & Skogan, W. G. (1979).Citizen participation and community crime prevention, 1979: Chicago metropolitan area survey. Conducted by Northwestern University, Center for Urban Affairs and Policy Research. 2nd ICPSR ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium of Political and Social Research [producer and distributor], 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, P. (1984). If you don’t do it, nobody else will.American Sociological Review, 49, 601–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rountree, P. W., Land, K. C., & Miethe, T. D. (1994). Macro-micro integration in the study of victimization: A hierarchical logistic model analysis across Seattle.Criminology, 32, 387–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rountree, P. W., & Land, K. C. (1996). Burglary victimization, perceptions of crime risk, and routine activities.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 33, 147–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rountree, P. W., & Land, K. C. (1996). Perceived risk versus fear of crime: Empirical evidence of conceptually distinct reactions in survey data.Social Forces, 74, 1353–1376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J. (1988). Legal friendship ties and community attachment in mass society: A multilevel systemic model.American Sociological Review, 53, 766–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., & Groves, W. B. (1989). Community structures and crime: Testing social disorganization theory.American Journal of Sociology, 94, 774–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, C. R., & McKay, H. D. (1942).Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W. R., & Torstensson, M. (1997). Fear of crime: Gender differences in risk perception and neutralizing fear of crime.British Journal of Criminology, 37, 608–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. John, C., & Heald-Moore, T. (1996). Age, racial prejudice and fear of criminal victimization in public settings.Sociological Focus, 29, 15–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R. B., Shumaker, S. A., & Gottfredson, S. D. (1985). Neighborhood-level links between physical features and local sentiments: Deterioration, fear of crime, and confidence.Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 2, 261–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R. B. (1995). The impact of crime on communities.The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 539, 28–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, M. A. (1994). Measuring concern about crime: Some inter-racial comparisons.British Journal of Criminology, 34, 366–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, B. D., & Pierce, G. L. (1993). Reexamining social disorganization theory using calls to the police as a measure of crime.Criminology, 31, 493–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner, B. D., & Rountree, P. W. (1997). Local social ties in a community and crime model: Questioning the systemic nature of informal social control.Social Problems, 44, 520–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, B., & Wortley, S. (1990). Different strokes from different folks: Community ties and social support.American Journal of Sociology, 96, 558–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittberg, P. (1984). The effects of local activity on neighborhood attitudes: A comparison of black and white urbanites.Urban Affairs Quarterly, 20, 185–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolever, C. (1992). A contextual approach to neighborhood attachment.Urban Studies, 29, 99–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Data for this study were made available by the Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Delisi, M., Regoli, B. Individual neighborhood attachment and perceptions of neighborhood safety. Am J Crim Just 24, 181–188 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02887591

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02887591

Keywords

Navigation