Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The inferior ovary. II

  • Published:
The Botanical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Within the last 12 years knowledge concerning the inferior ovary has been extended, but controversy has not terminated. As the result of anatomical studies, appendicular inferior ovaries have been reported in various genera of the following families: Agavaceae, Araliaceae, Begoniaceae, Bromeliaceae, Caprifoliaceae, Celastraceae, Compositae, Cornaceae, Ericaceae, Orchidaceae and Rubiaceae, and inJuglans of the Juglandaceae. The receptacular cup type, with ascending and recurrent budles in the wall, present inDarbya seems to be characteristic of the Santalaceae as a whole, of the Loranthaceae, ofCarya andAnnamocarya of the Juglandaceae, and of the Cactaceae. True inferior ovaries, in which the outer structures are fused with the ovary, should be distinguished from perigynous cups, as are found inRosa andCalycanthus. Recently the value of using the anatomical method in solving the problem of the structure of the inferior ovary has been questioned because of facts which have come out of modern studies in histogenesis and morphogenesis. It should be emphasized, however, that these facts are concerned with ontogeny. Plant morphologists have found that vascular anatomy, when used in comparative studies, has been a most valuable tool in the reconstruction of plant phylogenies, and they see no valid reason why it is not conclusive in the determination of the nature of the inferior ovary wall.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Abbas, E.-H. 1952. Vergleichen-morphologische Untersuchungen am Gynoeceum der Unterfamilien Melanthioideae und Asphodeloideae der Liliaceae. Arbeit. Inst Bot. Univ. Zürich. Ser. A. No. 4.

  • Arber, Agnes. 1950. The natural philosophy of plant form.

  • Arnal, C. 1948. Étude sur les pistils à ovaire infère. I.Sambucus niger. Bull. Soc. Bot. France95(1/2): 60–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • — etJ. Loiseau. 1946. L’epéron de la fleur deTropaeolum majus L. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. [Paris]223: 361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baehni, C., etC. E. B. Bonner. 1948. La yascularisation des fleurs chez les Lopezieae (Onagraceae). Candollea11: 305–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1949. La vascularization du tube floral chez les Onagracées. Candollea12: 346–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, I. W., andB. G. L. Swamy. 1951. The conduplicate carpel of dicotyledons and its initial trends of specialization. Amer. Tour. Bot.38: 373–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, Ernest. 1949. The shoot apex and normal plant ofLupinus albus L., bases for experimental morphology. Amer. Jour. Bot.36: 440–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1950. Isolation, removal and attempted transplants of the central portions of the shoot apex ofLupinus albus L. Amer. Jour. Bot.37: 117–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, Hermine. 1948a. Über die postgenital Verwachsung in Karpellen. Österr. Bot. Zeits.95: 86–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1948b. Die Verbreitung der postgenital Verwachsung im Gynözeum und ihre Bedeutung für die typologische Betrachtung des coenokarpen Gynözeums. Österr. Bot. Zeits.95: 124–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1948c. Postgenitale Verwachsung in und zwischen Karpell- und Staubblattkreisen. S.-B. Akad. Wiss. Wien, Math.-Nat. K1. Sitzber. Abt. I157: 17–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1949. Sur Frage des schrittweisen Überganges von apokarpen zum coenokarpen Gynözeum. Österr. Bot. Zeits.95: 470–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1950. Septalspalten im Gynözeum vonKoelreuteria paniculata. Österr. Bot. Zeits.97: 208–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, M. S., andE. J. Welsford. 1909. The morphology of the ovule and female flower ofJugions regia and a few allied genera. Ann. Bot.23: 623–633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkeley, Edmund. 1953. Morphological studies in the Celastraceae. Jour. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc.69: 185–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, Caroline E. 1916. The nature of the inflorescence and fruit ofPyrus Malus. N. Y. Bot. Gard., Mem.6: 519–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaser, H. W., andJ. Einset. 1948. Leaf development in six periclinal chromosomal chimeras of apple varieties. Amer. Jour. Bot.35: 473–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1950. Flower structure in periclinal chimeras of apple. Amer. Jour. Bot.37: 297–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaser, Jeanne LeC. 1954. The morphology of the flower and inflorescence ofMitchella repens. Amer. Jour. Bot.41: 533–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boke, N. H. 1947. Shoot apex and floral initiation inVinca rosea. Amer. Jour Bot.34: 433–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1948. Development of the perianth inVinca rosea L. Amer. Jour. Bot.35: 413–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonne, Gabrielle. 1928. Recherches sur le pédicelle et la fleur des Rosacées.

  • Bonner, C. E. B. 1948. The floral vascular supply inEpilobium and related genera. Candollea11: 277–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boring, E. G. 1954. Psychological factors in the scientific process. Amer. Sci.42: 639–645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, Reid M. 1940. Comparative histogenesis of vegetative and floral apices inAmygdalus communis, with special reference to the carpel. Hilgardia13: 249–299.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buchet, S. 1928. La concrescence congenitale n’est pas une vue de l’esprit. Bull. Soc. Bot. France75: 733–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bugnon, P. 1926. Valeur morphologique de l’ovaire infère chez lesBegonia. Bull. Soc. Linn. Normandie, VII.9: 7–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1928a. Les bases anatomiques de la théorie de la concrescence congenitale. Bull. Soc. Bot. France75: 25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1928b. La concrescence congenitale n’est par encore devenue un fait indiscutable. Bull. Soc. Bot. France75: 740–750.

    Google Scholar 

  • — etF. Bugnon. 1953. La paroi de l’ovaire infère des “Begonia” est-elle de nature axile ou appendiculaire ? Bull. Sci. Bourgogne14: 119–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chou, Yü-Liang. 1952. Floral morphology of three species ofGaultheria. Bot. Gaz.114: 198–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, H. F. 1943. A study, anatomical and taxonomic, of the genera of the Rhododendroideae. Amer. Mid. Nat.30: 533–625.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1947. Observations on the structure and classification of the Pyroleae. Madroño9: 65–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulter, J. M., C. R. Barnes andH. C. Cowles. 1910. A text-book of botany. I. Morphology.

  • Cross, G. L., andT. J. Johnson. 1941. Structural features of the shoot apices of diploid and colchicine-induced tetraploid strains ofVinca rosea L. Bull Torrey Bot. Club.68: 618–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dermen, Haig. 1953. The pattern of tetraploidy in the flower and fruit of a cytochimeral apple. Jour Hered.44: 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, Gertrude E. 1944. The inferior ovary. Bot. Rev.10: 125–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eames, A. J. 1931. The vascular anatomy of the flower with refutation of the theory of carpel polymorphism. Amer. Jour. Bot.18: 147–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1953. Floral anatomy as an aid in generic limitation. Chron. Bot.14: 126–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • - andL. H. MacDaniels. 1947. An introduction to plant anatomy. 2nd ed.

  • — andC. L. Wilson. 1928. Carpel morphology of the Cruciferae. Amer. Jour. Bot.15: 251–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egler, F. E. 1951. The terminology of floral types. Chron. Bot.12(4/6): 169–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engard, C. J. 1944. Organogenesis inRubus. Univ. Hawaii, Res. Pub. 21.

  • Esau, Katherine. 1943. Origin and development of primary vascular tissue in seed plants. Bot. Rev.9: 125–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. 1950. Developmental aspects of primary vascularization. Proc. VII Int. Bot. Congr: 395.

  • -. 1953. Plant anatomy.

  • Fagerlind, F. 1948. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Gynaeceummorphologie und Phylogenie der Santales-familien. Svensk. Bot. Tidskr.42: 195–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, A. S. 1936. Leaf differentiation in agiosperms. Bot. Rev.2: 349–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. 1949. Practical plant anatomy. 2nd ed.

  • Gauthier, Roger. 1950. The nature of the inferior ovary in the genusBegonia. Contr. Inst. Bot. Univ. Montreal. No. 66. 1–93.

  • Gifford, E. M., Jr. 1950. The structure and development of the shoot apex in certain woody Ranales. Amer. Jour. Bot.37: 595–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1954. The shoot apex in angiosperms. Bot. Rev.20: 477–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grégoire, V. 1938. La morphogénèse et l’autonomie morphologique de l’appareil floral. I. Le carpelle. Cellule47: 287–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunckel, J. E., andR. H. Wetmore. 1946. Studies of development in long shoots and short shoots ofGinkgo biloba. II. Phyllotaxies and the origin of the primary vascular system: primary phloem and primary xylem. Amer. Jour. Bot.33: 532–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsü, J. 1944. Structure and growth of the shoot apex ofSinocalamus beecheyana McClure. Amer. Jour. Bot.31: 404–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Gemma. 1934. The morphology of the flowers ofRosa and certain closely related genera. Amer. Jour. Bot.21: 453–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasapligil, B. 1951. Morphological and ontogenetic studies ofUmbellularia californica Nutt. andLaurus nobilis L. Univ. Calif., Pub. Bot25: 115–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaussman, Bernhard. 1951. Morphologische und anatomische Studien anSchizocapsa plantaginea Hance. Planta39: 91–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, Minna F. 1930. Studies in the anatomy and morphology of the Compositae flower. I. The corolla. Amer. Jour. Bot.17: 938–952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, E. J. 1913. The pollination of the pomaceous fruits. Gross morphology of the apple. Oregon Agr. Coll. Exp. Sta., Res. Bull. 1, part1: 1–12.

  • — andG. S. Ralston. 1916. The pollination of the pomaceous fruits. III. Gross vascular anatomy of the apple. Oregon Agr. Coll. Exp. Sta., Bull.138: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leden, R. B. 1954. The vegetative shoot apex ofZea Mays. Amer. Jour. Bot.41: 11–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leinfellner, Walter. 1941. Über den unterständigen Fruchtknoten und einige Bemerkungen über den Bauplan des verwachsenblättrigen Gynoeceums an sich. Bot Archiv42: 1–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1951. Die Nachahmung der durch kongenitale Verwachsung enstandenen Formen des Gynözeums durch postgenitale Verschmelzungsvorgänge. Österr. Bot. Zeits.98: 403–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1954. Die Kelchblätter und unterständigen Fruchtknoten und Achsenbechern. österr. Bot. Zeits.101: 315–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leroy, J.-F. 1951. Morphologie végétale—Contra la theorie généralisée des carpelles sporophylles. I. Une structure singuliere d’axe invaginé et de placentation caulinaire chezAnnamocarya A. Chev. (Juglandaceae). Comp. Rend. Acad. Sci. [Paris]232: 432–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1955. Étude sur les Juglandaceae. Mém. Mus. Nat. Hist. Nat. No. ser. Bot. Paris7: 1–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDaniels, L. H. 1940. The morphology of the apple and other pome fruits. Cornell Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta., Mem. 230.

  • Manning, W. E. 1926. The morphology of the flowers of the Juglandaceae. Diss., Cornell Univ.

  • —. 1940. The morphology of the flowers of the Juglandaceae. II. The pistillate flowers and fruit. Amer. Jour. Bot.27: 839–852.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCoy, R. W. 1940. Floral organization inFrasera caroliniensis. Amer. Jour. Bot.27: 600–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Helena A., andR. H. Wetmore. 1945. Studies in the developmental anatomy ofPhlox Drummondii Hook. III. The apices of the mature plant. Amer. Jour. Bot.33: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millington andGunckel. 1950. Structure and development of the vegetative shoot tip ofLiriodendron tulipifera L. Amer. Jour. Bot.37: 326–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mort, E. 1950. Vergleichende morphologische Untersuchungen am Gynoeceum der Saxifragaceen. Ber. Schweiz. Bot. Ges.60: 516–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morley, Thomas. 1953. The genusMouriri (Melastomaceae). Univ. Cal. Pub. Bot.26: 223–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nast, Charlotte G. 1935. Morphological development of the fruit ofJuglons regia. Hilgardia9: 345–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1944. The comparative morphology of the Winteraceae. VI. Vascular anatomy of the flowering shoot. Jour. Arn. Arb.25: 454–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okimoto, Marion C. 1948. Anatomy and histology of the pineapple inflorescence and fruit. Bot. Gaz.110: 217–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, E. S. 1953. Early floral development inGaura coccinea Pursh. Proc. So. Dak. Acad. Sci.32: 41–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozenda, P. 1949. Recherches sur les Dicotylédones apocarpiques. Contribution à l’étude des Angiospermes dites primitives. Thesis. École Normale Sup. Publ. Ser. Biol. Fasc. II.

  • Palser, Barbara F. 1951. Studies of floral morphology in the Ericales. I. Organography and vascular anatomy in the Andromedeae. Bot. Gaz.112: 447–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1954. Studies of floral morphology in the Ericales. III. Organography and vascular anatomy in several species of the Arbuteae. Phytomorphology4: 335–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkin, J. 1955. A plea for simpler gynoecium. Phytomorphology5: 46–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philipson, W. R. 1949. The ontogeny of the shoot apex in dicotyledons. Biol. Rev. Cambridge Phil. Soc.24: 21–50.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Popham, R. A., andA. P. Chan. 1950. Zonation in the vegetative stem tip ofChrysanthemum morifolium Bailey. Amer. Jour. Bot.37: 476–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puri, V. 1951. The role of floral anatomy in the solution of morphological problems. Bot. Rev.17: 471–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1952a. Floral anatomy and inferior ovary. Phytomorphology2: 122–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1952b. Placentation in angiosperms. Bot. Rev.18: 603–651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, L. N. 1942. Studies in the Santalaceae. Ann. Bot. N.S.6: 151–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, V. S. 1949. The morphology of the calyx tube and origin of perigyny in the Turneraceae. Jour. Indian Bot. Soc.28: 198–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sass, J. E. 1944. The initiation and development of foliar and floral organs in the tulip. Iowa State Coll. Jour. Sci.18: 447–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satina, Sophie. 1944. Periclinal chimeras inDatura in relation to development and structure (a) of the style and stigma (b) of the calyx and corolla. Amer. Jour. Bot.31: 493–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • — andA. F. Blakeslee. 1941. Periclinal chimeras inDatura stramonium in relation to development of leaf and flower. Amer. Jour. Bot.28: 862–867.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1943. Periclinal chimeras inDatura in relation to the development of the carpel. Amer. Jour. Bot.30: 453–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, Edith R. 1925. On carpel polymorphism. I. Ann. Bot.39: 123–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1927. On carpel polymorphism. II. Ann. Bot.41: 569–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1931. Illustrations of carpel polymorphism. VII. Begoniaceae. New Phyt.30: 97–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaeppi, H., undF. Steindl. 1942. Blütenmorphologische und embryologische Untersuchungen an Loranthoideen. Vjschr. nat. Ges. Zürich87: 301–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • - und -. 1945. Blütenmorphologische und embryologische Untersuchungen an einigen Viscoideen. Vjschr. nat. Ges. Zürich90: Beiheft Nr. 1.

  • ——. 1950. Vergleichend-morphologische Untersuchungen am Gynoeceum des Rosoideen. Ber. Schweiz. Bot. Ges.60: 15–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D. F. 1932. Discussion on Dr. Hamshaw Thomas’ paper, “The old morphology and the new”. Proc. Linn. Soc. London. Session145, 145: p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, D. N. 1949. Vascular anatomy of the flower of some species of the Cactaceae. Unpub. thesis, Agra Univ.

  • Sharman, B. C. 1945. Leaf and bud initiation in the Gramineae. Bot. Gaz.106: 269–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuhart, D. C. 1932. Morphology and anatomy of the fruit ofHicoria pecan. Bot. Gaz.93: 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sifton, H. B. 1944. Developmental morphology of vascular plants. New Phytol43: 87–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D. 1954. Floral morphology and embryology ofHedera nepalensis K. Koch. Agra Univ., Jour. Res. Sci. Agra3: 289–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, F. H. andElizabeth, C. 1942a. Anatomy of the inferior ovary ofDarbya. Amer. Jour. Bot.29: 464–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • - and -. 1942b. Floral anatomy of the Santalaceae and some related forms. Oregon State Monographs, Studies in Bot. No. 5.

  • Smith, G. H. 1928. Vascular anatomy of ranalian flowers. II. Bot. Gaz.85: 152–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, Edna. 1945. Floral morphology ofChrysothamnus nauscosus speciosus. Bot. Gaz.106: 451–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G. L. 1940. The Cichorieae. Mem. Torrey Bot. Club19: 5–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swamy, B. G. L. 1948. Vascular anatomy of orchid flowers. Bot. Mus. Leafl. Harvard Univ.13(4): 61–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tepfer, S. S. 1953. Floral anatomy and ontogeny inAquilegia formosa var.truncata andRanunculus repens. Univ. Cal. Pub. Bot25(7): 513–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiagi, Y. D. 1955. Studies in floral morphology. II. Vascular anatomy of the flower in certain species of the Cactaceae. Jour. Indian Bot. Soc.34: 408–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tukey, H. B., andJ. O. Young. 1942. Gross morphology and histology of developing fruit of the apple. Bot. Gaz.104: 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Tieghem, P. 1871. Recherches sur la structure du pistil et sur l’anatomie comparée de la fleur. Mém. des savants étrangers à l’Institut de France21: 1–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardlaw, C. W. 1950. The comparative investigation of apices of vascular plants by experimental methods. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London. Ser. B. Biol. Sci.234: 583–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1953. Comparative observations on the shoot apices of vascular plants. New Phytol.52: 195–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetmore, R. H., andC. W. Wardlaw. 1951. Experimental morphogenesis in vascular plants. Ann. Rev. Plant. Physiol.2: 269–292.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, Antoinette M. 1944. Floral anatomy of some species ofCornus. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club71: 276–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1948a. Floral anatomy and morphology of some species of the tribe Lonicereae of the Caprifoliaceae. Amer. Jour. Bot.35: 261–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1948b. Floral anatomy and morphology of some species of the tribes Linnaeae and Sambuceae of the Caprifoliaceae. Amer. Jour. Bot.35: 365–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1948c. Floral anatomy and morphology of some species of the genusViburnum of the Caprifoliaceae. Amer. Jour. Bot.35: 455–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1949. Floral anatomy and morphology ofTriosteum and of the Caprifoliaceae in general. Amer. Jour. Bot.36: 481–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, C. L., andT. Just. 1939. The morphology of the flower. Bot. Rev.5: 97–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunderlich, Rosalie. 1950. Die Agavaceae Hutchinson’s im Lichte ihrer Embryologie, ihres Gynözeum-, Steubblatt- und Blattbaues. Öesterr. Bot. Zeits.97: 437–502.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Feura Bush, N. Y.

    Gertrude E. Douglas

Authors
  1. Gertrude E. Douglas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Supplement to article in The Botanical Review10: 125–186. 1944.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Douglas, G.E. The inferior ovary. II. Bot. Rev 23, 1–46 (1957). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02870484

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02870484

Keywords

Search

Navigation