Skip to main content
Log in

A Study of potato harvesting at Tulelake, California

  • Published:
American Potato Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusions

There was practically no difference in the amount of serious injury between hand and mechanical harvesting by the time the potatoes were in storage. There was less injury in the field with the hand method but rough handling of the stubs in loading onto the trucks and in emptying at the storage shed, caused a considerable increase. More damage than necessary occurred with both methods in conveying the potatoes into the storage bins. Reducing the drop into the conveyor hopper, better padding in the hopper, and keeping the drop from the discharge end to a minimum, would help to reduce this damage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. Greene, R. E. L., L. J. Kushman, J. S. Norton, H. C. Spurlock. 1954. Mechanical harvesting and bulk handling of potatoes in Florida and Alabama.

  2. Hardenburg, E. V. 1937. Grade analysis of potatoes on Cleveland market. Am. Potato Jour. 14: 107–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sparks, Walter C. 1954. Injury to Russet Burbank potatoes by different harvesting machines.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tavernetti, J.R., Baghott, K.G. A Study of potato harvesting at Tulelake, California. American Potato Journal 37, 34–37 (1960). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02855590

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02855590

Keywords

Navigation