Third party roles in intimate partner violence incidents and their effects on police response in a statewide rural jurisdiction
- Stan Shernock
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Using police narratives and affidavits, as well as incident report forms, this paper examines the neglected research topic of third party involvement in intimate partner violence and reports findings that differ from previous research done on the subject as a secondary topic. After identifying two analytically distinct roles of third parties, those of complainant and eyewitness, the study finds that the presence of complainants and eyewitnesses alone has no effect on police arrest dispositions. However, arrest is increased significantly when eyewitnesses become complainants or provide sworn statements. Other mafor findings of the study were: (1) the importance of the heretofore disregarded role of family members as third party witnesses; (2) the relative insignificance of marital status among cohabiting victim-offender couples on reporting and disposition; (3) the relatively small percentage of witnesses who are victimized; and (4) the greater willingness of witnesses to provide sworn statements against offenders with past versus current relationships to the victim.
- Austin, T., & Buzawa, E. (1993). Determining police responses to domestic violence victims: The role of victim preference.Am. Beh. Scientist 36, 610–623. CrossRef
- Bachman, R., & Coker, A.L. (1995). Police involvement in domestic violence: The interactive effects of victim injury, offender's history of violence, and race.Violence and Victims 10, 96–106.
- Berk, R., Berk, S., Newton, P., & Loseke, D. (1984). Cops on call: Summoning the police to the scene of spousal abuse.Law and Society Review 18, 479–498. CrossRef
- Berk, R., & Loseke, D. (1980–1981). Handling family violence: Situational determinants of police arrest in domestic disturbances.Law and Society Review 15, 317–346. CrossRef
- Brosnan, D. (1992). Perceptions of bystander willingness to intervene on behalf of victims of assaults: Implications for the development of co-productive strategies.Criminal Justice Policy Review 6(1), 40–54.
- Buzawa, E., & Buzawa, C. (1993). Opening the doors: The changing police response to domestic violence. In R. Dunham, R. & Alpert, G. (Eds.),Critical issues in policing (2nd ed., pp. 551–567). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
- Buzawa, E., & Buzawa, C. (2001). Traditional and innovative police responses to domestic violence. In Dunham, R., & Alpert, G. (Eds.),Critical issues in policing (4th ed., pp. 216–237). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
- Buzawa, E., Hotaling, G., Klein, A., & Byrne, J. (1999).Response to domestic violence in a proactive court setting: Final report. National Institute of Justice of the U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.
- Felson, R., & Ackerman, J. (2001). Arrests for domestic and other assaults.Criminology 39, 655–57. CrossRef
- Felson, R., Messner, S., & Hoskin, A. (1999). The victim-offender relationship and calling the police in assaults.Criminology 37 (4), 931–947. CrossRef
- Hoefnagels, C., & Zwikker, M. (2001). The bystander dilemma and child abuse: Extending the Latane and Darley model to domestic violence.Journal of Applied Social Psychology 31, 1158–83. CrossRef
- Hoyle, C., & Sanders A. (2000). Police response to domestic violence: From victim choice to victim empowerment.British Journal of Criminology 40, 14–36. CrossRef
- Hutchinson, I., & Hirschel, J.D. (2001). Effects of children's presence on woman abuse.Violence and Victims 16, 3–17.
- Laner, M., Benin, M., & Ventrone, N. (2001). Bystander attitudes toward victims of violence: Who's worth helping?Deviant Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal 22, 23–42.
- Mignon, S. & Holmes, W. (1995). Police response to mandatory arrest laws.Crime and Delinquency 41, 430–442. CrossRef
- Planty, M. (2002).Third-party involvement in violent crime, 1993–99 (NCJ 189100). Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report (July). 1–7.
- Robinson, A., & Chandek, M. (2000) The domestic violence arrest decision: Examining demographic, attitudinal, and situational variables.Crime and Delinquency 43, 104–118.
- Stalans, L. (1996). Family harmony or individual protection? Recommendations about how policy can handle domestic violence situations.Am. Beh. Scientist 39 (4), 433–449. CrossRef
- Vermont State Police. (1998)Vermont State Police rules and regulations, operational policies and procedures, Section V, Chapter 5, Article V111, 4.1 (A) (5).
- Third party roles in intimate partner violence incidents and their effects on police response in a statewide rural jurisdiction
Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology
Volume 20, Issue 1 , pp 22-39
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Stan Shernock (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Justice Studies, and Sociology, Norwich University, 05663, Northfield, Vermont