Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring robustness for weighted distributions: Bayesian perspective

  • Articles
  • Published:
Statistical Papers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are many situations where the usual random sample from a population of interest is not available, due to the data having unequal probabilities of entering the sample. The method of weighted distributions models this ascertainment bias by adjusting the probabilities of actual occurrence of events to arrive at a specification of the probabilities of the events as observed and recorded. We consider two different classes of contaminated or mixture of weight functions, Γ a ={w(x):w(x)=(1−ε)w 0(x)+εq(x),qQ} and Γ g ={w(x):w(x)=w 1−ε0 (x)q ε(x),qQ} wherew 0(x) is the elicited weighted function,Q is a class of positive functions and 0≤ε≤1 is a small number. Also, we study the local variation of ϕ-divergence over classes Γ a and Γ g . We devote on measuring robustness using divergence measures which is based on the Bayesian approach. Two examples will be studied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bayarri, M.J. and DeGroot, M.H. (1992). A ‘BAD’ view of weighted distributions and selection models.Bayesian Statistics 4 eds. Bernardo, J, Berger, J.O., Dawid, A. and Smith, A.F.M., 17–33.

  • Berger, J. (1985).Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis. Springer, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Csiszar, I. (1967).Information Measures: A Critical Survey, Transactions of 7th Prague conference on Information theory, Statistical decision Functions, and Random Processes, Boxton, Reidel Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dey, D.K. and Birmiwal, L.R. (1994). Robust Bayesian analysis using entropy and divergence measures.Statistics and Probability Letters, 20, 287–294.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R.A. (1934) The effect of methods of ascertainment upon the estimation of frequencies.Annals of Eugen. 6, 13–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, A. and Dey, D.K. (1991) On measuring Bayesian robustness of contaminated classes of priors.Statistics and Decisions, 9, 63–80.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Goel, P. (1986). Comparison of experiments and information in censored data.Statistical Decisions and Related Topics IV, ed. S.S. Gupta and J.O. Berger, 2, 335–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedges, L.V. and Olkin, I. (1985).Statistical Methods for Meta Analysis. Orlande: Academic Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Iyenger, S. and Greenhouse, J.B. (1988). Selection models and the file drawer problem (with discussion).Statistical Sciences, 3, 109–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larose, D.T. and Dey, K.D. (1996) Weighted distribution viewed in the context of model selection: A Bayesian Perspective.Test, 5, 227–246.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, C.R. (1965). On discrete distribution arising out of methods of ascertainment. InClassical and Contagious Discrete Distributions, Ed. G.P. Patil, 320–333.

  • Silliman, N.P. (1997a). Nonparametric classes of weighted functions to model publication bias.Biometrika, 84, 909–918.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Silliman, N.P. (1997b). Hierarchical selection models with applications in meta-analysis.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 92, 926–936.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chung, Y., Kim, C. Measuring robustness for weighted distributions: Bayesian perspective. Statistical Papers 45, 15–31 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02778267

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02778267

Key words

Navigation