Skip to main content
Log in

Improving ratio-type quantile estimates in a finite population

  • Articles
  • Published:
Statistical Papers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a technique for improving the ratio method of estimation for finite population quantiles. The performance of this estimator with respect to others is studied theoretically and empirically, for a wide variety of real and artificial populations, and includes simple random sampling and sampling proportional to an auxiliary variable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arcos, A. and Rueda, M. (1997). Variance estimation using auxiliary information: an almost unbiased multivariate ratio estimator. Metrika45, 171–178.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Chambers, R. L. and Dunstan, R. (1986). Estimating distribution functions from survey data. Biometrika73, 597–604.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Fernández, F. R. and Mayor, J. A. (1994) Muestreo en Poblaciones Finitas: Curso Básico. (P.P.U. Barcelona)

  4. Gross, S. T. (1980). Median estimation in sample survey. Proc. Surv. Res. Meth. Sect. Amer. Statist. Ass., 181–184.

  5. Gupta, P. C. (1978). On some quadratic and higher degree ratio and product estimators. J. Ind. Soc. Agr. Stat.,30, 71–80.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kuk, A. (1993). A kernel method for estimating finite population distribution functions using auxiliary information. Biometrika80, 385–392.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Kuk, A. and Mak, T. K. (1989). Median estimation in the presence of auxiliary information. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B1(2), 261–269.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Meeden, G. (1995). Median estimation using auxiliary information. Survey Methodology21 (1), 71–77.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Olkin, I. (1958). Multivariate ratio estimation for finite population. Biometrika45, 154–165.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Pandey, G. S. (1980). Product-cum power estimators. Cal. Stat. Assoc. Bull.29, 103–108.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Randles, R. H. (1982). On the asymptotic normality of statistics with estimated parameters. Ann. Stat.10, 462–474.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Rao, J. N. K., Kovar, J. G. and Mantel, H. J. (1990). On estimating distribution functions and quantiles from survey data using auxiliary information. Biometrika77, 363–375.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Ray, S. K. and Singh, R. K. (1981). Difference-cum-ratio type estimators. J. Ind. Stat. Assoc.19, 153–157.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Rueda, M. and Arcos, A. (1996). Repeated substitution method: The ratio estimator for the population variance. Metrika43, 101–105.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Rueda, M. and Arcos, A. (2002). Quantile estimates in a finite population Technical report, University of Granada.

  16. Rueda, M., Arcos, A. and Artés, E. (1998). Quantile interval estimation in finite population using a multivariate ratio estimator. Metrika47, 203–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sampath, S. and Durairajan, T. M. (1988). An efficient ratio type estimator, J. Ind. Stat. Assoc.26, 67–71.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Särndal, C. E., Swensson, B. and Wretman, J. (1992) Model Assisted Survey Sampling. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Sedransk, J. and Smith, P. J. (1988). Inference for finite population quantiles. In: Krishnaiah, P. R. and Rao, C. R. (eds.) Handbook of Statistics, Vol 6, Chap. 11, 267–289. North-Holland.

  20. Singh, S., Joarder, A. H. and Tracy, D. S. (2001). Median estimation using double sampling. Aust. N. Z. J. Stat.43(1), 33–46.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Srivastava, S. K. (1967). An estimator using auxiliary information in sample surveys. Cal. Stat. Assoc. Bull.16, 121–132.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Suthatme, B. V. and David, I. P. (1973). A note on Koop's approach for finding the bias of the ratio estimate. Journal of the American Statistical Association68(342), 405–406.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Thompson, S. K. (1992) Sampling John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

  24. Woodruff, R. S. (1952). Confidence intervals for medians and other position measures. Journal of the American Statistical Association47, 635–646.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rueda, M., Arcos, A. Improving ratio-type quantile estimates in a finite population. Statistical Papers 45, 231–248 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02777225

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02777225

Keywords

Navigation