Skip to main content
Log in

Why don’tSaimiri oerstedii andCebus capucinus form mixed-species groups?

  • Published:
International Journal of Primatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The instances of association with Cebus capucinustroops were monitored for 11 months as part of a field study of Saimiri oerstediiin a tropical wet forest in Costa Rica, Parque Nacional Corcovado. Contrary to the usual situation in South America, where S. sciureusforms persistent mixed-species groups with Cebus apella,in Corcovado S. oerstediirarely associated with Cebus capucinus;the frequencies were consistent with those expected from random association. Depending on the season, the S. oerstediitroop spent between 2.3 and 11.8% of its time in the vicinity of a Cebus capucinustroop. Most associations appeared to be chance meetings of short duration. When the two species did associate for an extended period, it was Cebus capucinus,and not S. oerstedii,that appeared to maintain the association, possibly in order to benefit from the antipredator behavior of S. oerstedii.There was no evidence that either species benefited from enhanced foraging efficiency when in association.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, R. D. (1974). The evolution of social behavior.A. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 5: 325–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altmann, J. (1974). Observational study of behaviour: sampling methods.Behaviour 69: 227–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, J. D., and Baldwin, J. I. (1972). The ecology and behavior of squirrel monkeys (Saimiri oerstedii) in a natural forest in western Panama.Folia Primatol. 18: 161–184.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boinski, S. (1980).Cebid Wet Season Interspecific Association in Corcovado National Park, Costa Rica, Unpublished M.A. thesis, University of Texas, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boinski, S. (1985). The status ofSaimiri oerstedi in Costa Rica.Primate Conserv. 6: 15–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boinski, S. (1986).The Ecology of Squirrel Monkeys in Costa Rica, Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boinski, S. (1987a). Mating patterns in squirrel monkeys (Saimiri oerstedi): Implications for seasonal sexual dimorphism.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 21: 13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boinski, S. (1987b). Birth synchrony in squirrel monkeys (Saimiri oerstedi): a strategy to reduce neonatal predation.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 21: 393–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boinski, S. (1987c). Habitat use by squirrel monkeys (Saimiri oerstedi) in Costa Rica.Folia Primatol. 49: 151–167.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boinski, S. (1988a). Sex differences in the foraging behavior of squirrel monkeys (So) in Costa Rica.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 23: 177–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boinski, S. (1988b). Use of a club by a wild white-faced capuchin (Cebus capucinus) to attack a venomous snake (Bothrops asper).Am. J. Primatol. 14: 177–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boinski, S. (1989). Positional behavior and substrate use by squirrel monkeys: Ecological implications.J. Hum. Evol. 18 (in press).

  • Boinski, S., and Fowler, N. L. (1989). Seasonal patterns in a tropical lowland forest.Biotropica 21: 223–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boinski, S., and Fragaszy, D. M. (1989). The ontogeny of foraging in squirrel monkeys (Saimiri oerstedi) Anim. Behav. 37: 415–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boinski, S., and Newman, J. D. (1988). Preliminary observations on squirrel monkey (Saimiri oerstedi) vocalizations in Costa Rica.Am. J. Primatol. 14: 329–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boinski, S., and Scott, P. E. (1988). Association between birds and monkeys in Costa Rica.Biotropica 20: 136–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boinski, S., and Timm, R. M. (1985). Predation by squirrel monkeys and double-toothed kites on tent-making bats.Am. J. Primatol. 9: 121–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. H., and Harvey, P. H. (1976). Evolutionary rules and primate societies. In Bateson, P. P. G., and Hinde, R. H. (eds.),Growing Points in Ethology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 195–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Ruiter, J. R. (1986). The influence of group size on predator scanning and foraging behaviour of wedgecapped capuchin monkeys (Cebus olivaceus).Behaviour 98: 240–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleagle, J. G., Mittermeier, R. A., and Skopec, A. L. (1981). Differential habitat use byCebus apella andSaimiri sciureus in central Surinam.Primates 22: 361–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freese, C. H., and Oppeneheimer, J. R. (1981). The capuchin monkey, genusCebus. In CoimbraFilho, A. F., and Mittermeier, R. A. (eds.),Ecology and Behavior of Neotropical Primates, Academia Brasiliera de Ciencias, Rio de Janeiro, pp. 331–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gautier-Hion, A., Quris, R., and Gautier, J.-P. (1983). Monospecific vs. polyspecific life: A comparative study of foraging and anti-predatory tactics in a community ofCercopithecus monkeys.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 12: 325–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hershkovitz, P. (1984). Taxonomy of squirrel monkeys genusSaimiri (Cebidae: Platyrrhini): A preliminary report with a description of a hitherto unnamed form.Am. J. Primatol. 7: 155–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izawa, K. (1975). Foods and feeding behavior or monkeys in the upper Amazon basin.Primates 16: 295–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izawa, K. (1976). Group sizes and compositions of monkeys in the upper Amazon basin.Primates 17: 367–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izawa, K. (1980). Social behavior of the wild black-capped capuchin (Cebus appella)).Primates 21: 443–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, L. L., and Klein, D. (1973). Observations on two types of neotropical primate intertaxa associations.Am. J. Phys. Anthrop. 3: 649–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moynihan, M. (1976).The New World Primates, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N. J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neville, M., Castro, N., Marmol, A., and Revilla, J. (1976). Censusing primate populations in the reserved area of the Pacaya and Samiria rivers, Department Loreto, Peru.Primates 17: 151–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer, J. R. (1968).Behavior and Ecology of the White-Faced Monkey Cebus capucinus on Barro Colorado Island, Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. G., and Janson, C. H. (1987). Capuchins, squirrel monkeys, and atelines: Sociological convergence with Old World primates. In Smuts, B. B., Cheney, D. L., Seyfarth, R. M., Wrangham, R. W., and Struhsaker, T. T. (eds.),Primate Societies, University Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 69–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubenstein, D. I., and Wrangham, R. W. (eds.) (1986).Ecological Aspects of Social Evolution, Princeton University Press, Princeton. N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, A. R. E. (1985). Does interspecific competition or predation shape the African ungulate community?J. Anim. Ecol. 54: 899–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Struhsaker, T. T. (1981). Polyspecific association among tropical rainforest primates.Z. Tierpsychol. 57: 268–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terborgh, J. (1983).Five New World Primates: A Study in Comparative Ecology, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terborgh, J., and Janson, C. H. (1986). The socioecology of primate groups.A. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17: 111–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorington, R. W., Jr. (1967). Feeding and activity ofCebus andSaimiri in a Columbian forest. In Starck, D., Schneider, R. and Kuhn, J.-J. (eds.),Progress in Primatology, Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, pp. 180–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorington, R. W., Jr. (1968). Observations of squirrel monkeys in a Columbian forest. In Rosenblum, L. A., and Cooper, R. W. (eds.),The Squirrel Monkey, Academic Press, New York, pp. 69–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorington, R. W., Jr. (1985). The taxonomy and distribution of squirrel monkeys (Saimiri). In Rosenblum, L. A., and Coe, C. L. (eds.),Handbook of Squirrel Monkey Research, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waser, P. (1984). “Chance” and mixed-species associations.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 15: 197–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waser, P. (1987). Interactions among primates species. In Smuts, B. B., Cheney, D. L., Seyfarth, R. M., Wrangham, R. W., and Struhsaker, T. T. (eds.),Primate Societies, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 210–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, E. O., and Oniki, Y. (1978). Birds and army ants.A. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 9: 243–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham, R. W. (1980). An ecological model of female-bonded primate groups.Behaviour 75: 262–300.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boinski, S. Why don’tSaimiri oerstedii andCebus capucinus form mixed-species groups?. Int J Primatol 10, 103–114 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02736248

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02736248

Key words

Navigation