Skip to main content
Log in

A fixed sample size selection procedure for negative binomial populations

  • Publications
  • Published:
Metrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A fixed sample size procedure for selecting the ‘best’ ofk negative binomial populations is developed. Selection is made in such a way that the probability of correct selection is at leastP* whenever the distance between the probabilities of success is at leastδ*. The exponentr is assumed to be known and the same for all populations. Extensive computer calculations* were employed to obtain the exact least favorable configuration. The smallest sample sizes needed to meet specifications (P*,δ*) are tabulated forr=1 (1)5;δ*=0.05 (0.05) 0.55 andP*=0.75, 0.80, 0.90, 0.95, 0.98, 0.99 involvingk=3 (1) 6, 8, 10 populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bechhofer RE, Kiefer J, Sobel M (1968) Sequential Identification and Ranking Procedures. The Univ of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers ML, Jarratt P (1964) Use of Double Sampling for Selecting Best Population. Biometrika 51:49–64

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Clark SJ, Perry JN (1989) Estimation of the Negative Binomial Parameterk by Maximum Quasi-Likelihood. Biometrics 45:309–316

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta SS, Nagel K (1971) In: Gupta SS, Yackel J (eds) On some Contributions to Multiple Decision Theory. Statistical Decision Theory and Related Topics, pp 79–95

  • Mahamunulu DM (1967) Some Fixed-Sample Ranking and Selection Problems. Ann Math Statist 38:1079–1091

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Nagardeolekar MS (1988) Fixed Sample Selection Procedures and an Approximate Kiefer-Weiss Solution for Negative Binomial Populations. Ph D Dissertation, Okla-State Univ., Stillwater, OK

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenton LR, Bowman KO (1967) Remarks on Large Sample Estimators for some Discrete Distributions. Technometrics 9:587–598

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sobel M, Huyett MJ (1957) Selecting the Best one of Several Binomial Populations. Bell Syst Tech J 36:537–576

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson E, Brentherton MH (1964) Tables of Logarithmic Series Distribution. Ann Math Statist 35:284–297

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Willson LJ, Folks JL, Young JH (1984) Multistage Estimation Compared with Fixed-Sample-Size Estimation of the Negative Binomial Parameterk Biometrics 40:109–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Quenouille MH (1949) A Relation Between the Logarithmic Poisson and Negative Binomial Series. Biometrics 5:162–164

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

All the computations were carried out on the Alabama Supercomputer. Part of this work was completed when the authors were at the Department of Statistics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mulekar, M.S., Young, L.J. A fixed sample size selection procedure for negative binomial populations. Metrika 40, 25–35 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02613661

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02613661

Key words and phrases

Navigation