Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of the cuscore, GLRT and cusum control charts for detecting a dynamic mean change

  • Change Point
  • Published:
Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although statistical process control (SPC) techniques have been focused mostly on detecting constant mean shifts, dynamic and time-varying process changes frequently occur in the monitoring of feedback-controlled and autocorrelated processes. In this research, the performances of cumulative score (Cuscore), generalized likelihood ratio test (GLRT), and cumulative sum (CUSUM) charts in detecting a dynamic mean change that finally approaches a steady-state value are compared. Theoretical results in average run length (ARL) comparison are provided. From the theretical study we find that, when the steady-state value is greater or less than a critical value,Rδ/2+δ/2, the Cuscore and CUSUM charts have a different performance in detecting the mean change. We prove also that the GLRT has the best performance among the three charts in detecting any mean change for which the steady-state value is not equal to δ or δR, when the in-control ARL is large.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alwan, L. C. and Roberts, H. V. (1988). Time-series modeling for statistical process control,Journal of Business Economic Statistics,6, 87–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apley, D. W. and Shi, J. (1994). A statistical process control method for autocorrelated data using a GLRT,Proceeding of the International Symposiumon Manufacturing Science and Technology for 21st Century, 165–170, Tsinghua Press Beijing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apley, D. W. and Shi, J. (1999). The GLRT for statistical process control of autocorrelated processes,IIE Transactions,31, 1123–1134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagshaw, M. and Johnson, R. A. (1977). Sequential procedures for detecting parameter changes in a time-series model,Journal of the American Statistical Association,72, 593–597.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Box, G. E. P. and Luceño, A. (1997).Statistical Control by Monitoring and Feedback Adjustment, Wiley, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Box, G. E. P. and Ramírez, J. G. (1992). Cumulative score charts,Quality Reliability Engineering International,8, 17–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esary, J. D., Proschan, F. and Walkup, D. W. (1967). Association of random variables with applications,The Annals of Mathematical Statistics,38, 1466–1474.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. A. (1925). Theory of statistical estimation,Proceeding of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.22, 700–725.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, S. J. and Roan, C. (1996). Change patterns of time series-based control charts,Journal of Quality Technology,28, 302–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keats, J. B., Montgomery, D. C., Runger, G. C. and Messina, W. S. (1996). Feedback control and statistical process monitoring,International Journal of Reliability, Quality, and Safety Engineering,3(2), 231–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, T. L. (1974). Control charts based on weighted sums,The Annals of Statistics 2, 134–147.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Luceño, A. (1999). Average run lengths and run length probability distributions for cuscore charts to control normal mean,Computational Sttistics & Data Analysis,32, 177–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, D. C. and Mastragelo, C. M. (1991). Some statistical process control charts methods for autocorrelated data.Journal of Quality Technology,23, 179–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moustakides, G. V. (1986). Optimal stopping times for detecting changes in distribution.The Annals of Statistics,14, 1379–1387.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ramírez, G. J. (1998). Monitoring clean room air using Cuscore charts.Quality Reliability Engineering International,14, 281–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritov, Y. (1990). Decision theoretic optimality of the Cusum procedure,The Annals of Statistics,18, 1464–1469.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Shu, L. J., Apley, D. W. and Tsung, F. (2002). Autocorrelated prodess monitoring using triggered Cuscore charts,Quality and Reliability Engineering International,18, 411–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegmund, D. and Venkatraman, E. S. (1995). Using the generalized likelihood ratio statistic for sequential detection of a change-point,The Annals of Statistics,23, 255–271.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tsung, F. and Tsui, K.-L. (2003). A mean shift pattern study on integration of SPC and APC for process monitoring,IIE Transactions,35, 231–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsung, F., Shi, J. and Wu, C. F. J. (1999). Joint monitoring of PID controlled processes.Journal of Quality Technology,31, 275–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasilopoulos, A. V. and Stamboulis, A. P. (1978). Modification of control chart limits in the presence of data correlation,Journal of Quality Technology,10, 20–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardell, D. G., Moskowitz, H. and Plante, R. D. (1992). Control charts in the presence of data correlationManagement Science,38, 1084–1105.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y. H. (1994). Design of control charts for detecting the change,Change—Point Problems, (eds. E. Carlstein, H. Muller and D. Siegmund),23, 330–345, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Hayward, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yashchin, E. (1993). Performance of CUSUM control schemes for serially correlated observations,Technonmetrics,35(1), 37–52.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Han, D., Tsung, F. Comparison of the cuscore, GLRT and cusum control charts for detecting a dynamic mean change. Ann Inst Stat Math 57, 531–552 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02509238

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02509238

Key words and phrases

Navigation