Skip to main content
Log in

Local asymptotic admissibility of a generalization of Akaike's model selection rule

  • Published:
Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A model selection rule of the form minimize [−2 log (maximized likelihood)+complexity] is considered, which is equivalent to Akaike's minimum AIC rule if the complexity of a model is defined to be twice the number of independently adjusted parameters of the model. Under reasonable assumptions, when applied to a locally asymptotically normal sequence of experiments, the model selection rule is shown to be locally asymptotically admissible with respect to a loss function of the form [inaccuracy+complexity], where the inaccuracy is defined as twice the Kullback-Leibler measure of the discrepancy between the true model and the fitted version of the selected model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akaike, H. (1973). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle,2nd International Symposium on Information Theory (eds. B. N. Petrov and F. Csaki), Akademiai Kaido, Budapest, 267–281.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at statistical model identification,IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., AC-19, 716–723.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson, T. W. (1962). The choice of the degree of a polynomial regression as a multiple decision problem,Ann. Math. Statist.,33, 255–265.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Billingsley, P. (1968).Convergence of Probability Measures, Wiley, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Blalock, H. M., Jr. (1961).Causal Inferences in Nonexperimental Research, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and statistics,J. Amer. Statist. Ass.,71, 791–799.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Bunge, M. (1963).The Myth of Simplicity: Problems of Scientific Philosophy, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Demster, A. P. (1971). Model searching and estimation in the logic of inference (with discussion),Foundations of Statistical Inference (eds. V. P. Godambe and D. A. Sprott) Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Toronto, 56–81.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Faden, A. M. and Rausser, G. C. (1976). Econometric policy model construction: The post-Bayesian approach,Ann. Economic. and Social Measurement,5, 349–362.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hájek, J. (1972). Local asymptotic minimax and admissibility in estimation,Proc. Sixth Berkeley Symp. Math. Statist. Prob.,1, 175–194.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Keeney, R. L. and Raiffa, H. (1976)Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, Wiley, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Kiefer, J. (1968).The Future of Statistics: Proceedings of a Conference on the Future of Statistics Held at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, June 1967 (ed. P. G. Watts), Academic Press, New York, 139–142.

    Google Scholar 

  13. LeCam, L. (1972). Limits of experiments,Proc. Sixth Berkeley Symp. Math. Statist. Prob.,1, 245–261.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. LeCam, L. (1979). On a theorem of J. Hájek,Contributions to Statistics: Jaroslav Hájek Memorial Volume (ed. J. Jurečková), Academia, Prague, 119–135.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lindley, D. V. (1968). The choice of variables in multiple regression (with discussion),J. R. Statist. Soc. B,30, 31–66.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Rao, C. R. (1973).Linear Statistical Inference and its Applications, 2nd Ed., Wiley, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Shibata, R. (1980). Asymptotically efficient selection of the order of the model for estimating parameters of a linear process,Ann. Statist.,8, 147–164.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Skorohod, A. V. (1956). Limit theorems for stochastic processes,Theory Prob. Appl.,1, 261–299.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Stone, C.J. (1981). Admissible selection of an accurate and parsimonious normal linear regression model,Ann. Statist.,9, 475–485.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Stone, C. J. (1981). Admissibility and local asymptotic admissibility of procedures which combine estimation and model selection,Proc. Third Purdue Symp. on Statist. Decision Theory and Related Topics, to appear.

  21. Taniguchi, M. (1980). On selection of the order of the spectral density model for a stationary process,Ann. Inst. Statist. Math.,32, A, 401–419.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Tukey, J. W. (1961). Discussion, emphasizing the connection between analysis of variance and spectrum analysis,Technometrics,3, 191–219.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O. (1953).Theory of Games and Economics Behavior, 3rd Ed., Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by NSF Grant No. MCS 80-02732.

About this article

Cite this article

Stone, C.J. Local asymptotic admissibility of a generalization of Akaike's model selection rule. Ann Inst Stat Math 34, 123–133 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02481014

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02481014

AMS 1980 subject classifications

Key words and phrases

Navigation