Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of tails of distributions in models for estimating safe doses

  • Published:
Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Heaviness of tail of distributions is compared each other analytically and systematically. Distributions under the study are the lognormal, loglogistic, Weibull, gamma, exponential-polynomial distributions. The beta loglogistic, which covers some of these distributions as its limits, is also discussed.

Heaviness of tail is an important notion in life-test, robust estimation and rank test. Here the notion is studied to examine models for estimating safe doses. Some results about heaviness of tail are given, and a new notion of heaviness of tail at the origin is defined and discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Armitage, P. and Doll, R. (1961). Stochastic models for carcinogens,Proc. 4th Berkeley Symp. Math. Statist. Prob.,4, 19–38.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barlow, R. E. and Proshan, F. (1965).Mathematical Theory of Reliability, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barlow, R. E., Bartholomew, D. J., Bremner, J. M. and Brunk, H. D. (1972).Statistical Inference under Order Restrictions, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Chand, N. and Hoel, D. G. (1974). A comparison of models for determining safe levels of environmental agents,Reliability and Biometry, SIAM, 681–700.

  5. Crump, K. S., Guess, H. A. and Deal, K. L. (1977). Confidence intervals and test of hypotheses concerning dose-response relations inferred from animal carcinogenicity data,Biometrics,33, 437–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Doksum, K. (1969). Starshaped transformations and the power of rank tests,Ann. Math. Statist.,40, 1167–1176.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Food and Drug Administration. Advisory Committee on Protocols for Safety Evaluation (1971). Panel on carcinogenesis report on cancer testing in the safety evaluation of food additive and pesticides,Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.,20, 419–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fraser, D. A. S. (1957).Nonparametric Methods in Statistics, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Gastwirth, J. L. (1970). On robust tests,Nonparametric Techniques in Statistical Inference, (ed. M. L. Puri) University Press, Cambridge, 89–101.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gehan, E. (1969). Estimating survival functions from the life table.J. Chronic Diseases,21, 629–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hartley, H. O. and Sielken, R. L., Jr. (1977). Estimation of “safe doses” in carcinogenic experiments,Biometrics,33, 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Iversen, S. and Arley, N. (1950). On the mechanism of experimental carcinogenesis,Acta Path. Microbiol. Scand.,27, 773–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mantel, N. and Bryan, W. R. (1961). “Safety” testing of carcinogenic agents,J. Nat. Cancer Inst.,27, 455–470.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mantel, N., Bohidar, N. R., Brown, C. C., Ciminera, J. L. and Tukey, J. W. (1975). An improved “Mantel-Bryan” procedure for “safety” testing of carcinogens,Cancer Res.,35, 865–872.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Peto, R. and Lee, P. (1973). Weibull distributions for continuous carcinogenesis experiments,Biometrics,29, 457–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Prentice, R. L. (1975). Discrimination among some parametric models,Biometrika,62, 607–614.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Prentice, R. L. (1976). A generalization of the probit and logit methods for dose response curves,Biometrics,32, 761–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rai, K. and van Ryzin, J. (1979). Risk assessment of toxic environmental substances using a generalized multi-hit dose response model,Energy and Health, SIMS Conf., SIAM Press, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sibuya, M. and Yanagimoto, T. Notions of heaviness of tail and comparison of distributions (in preparation).

  20. Takeuchi, K. (1972). On robust estimation—II,Jap. J. Appl. Statist.,2, 69–93 (in Japanese).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yanagimoto, T. and Sibuya, M. (1976). Isotonic tests for spread and tail,Ann. Inst. Statist. Math.,28, A, 329–342.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. van Zwet, W. R. (1964).Convex Transformation of Random Variables, Math. Centrum, Amsterdam.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Yanagimoto, T., Sibuya, M. Comparison of tails of distributions in models for estimating safe doses. Ann Inst Stat Math 32, 325–340 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02480337

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02480337

Keywords

Navigation