References
Bahadur, R. R. (1950). On a problem in the theory ofk populations,Ann. Math. Statist.,21, 362–375.
Bahadur, R. R. and Goodman, L. A. (1952). Impartial decision rules and sufficient statistics,Ann. Math. Statist.,23, 553–562.
Bechhofer, R. E. (1954). A single-sample multiple-decision procedure for ranking means of normal populations with known variances,Ann. Math. Statist.,25, 16–39.
Bland, R. P. and Bratcher, T. L. (1968). A Bayesian approach to the problem of ranking binomial probabilities,SIAM J. Appl. Math.,16, 843–850.
Bratcher, T. L. (1970). A Bayesian treatment of a multiple comparison problem for binomial probabilities, An unpublished manuscript.
Deeley, J. J. and Gupta, S. S. (1968). On the properties of subset selection procedures,Sankhyā, Ser. A,30, 37–50.
Fairweather, W. R. (1968). Some extensions of Somerville's procedure for ranking means of normal populations,Biometrika,55, 411–418.
Gupta, S. S. (1956).On a Decision Rule for a Problem in Ranking Means, Mimeograph Series No. 150, Institute of Statistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, N.C.
Gupta, S. S. and Sobel, M. (1960). Selecting a subset containing the best of several binomial populations,Contributions to Probability and Statistics, Essay in Honor of Harold Hotelling, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 224–248.
Lehmann, E. L. (1959).Testing Statistical Hypotheses, New York: Wiley.
Raiffa, H. and Schlaifer, R. (1961).Applied Statistical Decision Theory, Boston: Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration.
Seal, K. C. (1955). On a class of decision procedures for ranking means of normal populations,Ann. Math. Statist.,26, 387–398.
Seal, K. C. (1958). On ranking parameters of scale in Type III populations,J. Amer. Statist. Ass.,53, 164–175.
Somerville, P. N. (1954). Some problems of optimal sampling,Biometrika,41, 420–429.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Govindarajulu, Z., Harvey, C. Bayesian procedures for ranking and selection problems. Ann Inst Stat Math 26, 35–53 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02479802
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02479802