Skip to main content
Log in

Bayesian point estimation and prediction

  • Published:
Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the Bayesian viewpoint, point estimation and prediction are treated from a decision-making standpoint. If a loss function can be determined which associates a loss with every possible error of estimation or prediction, then the optimal estimator or predictor is that value which minimizes expected loss. In most applications, the loss function is assumed to be linear or quadratic in the error of estimation or prediction, although there are many practical situations in which these simple functions are quite inappropriate. In this paper, we investigate the properties of Bayesian point estimates under other loss functions; both the general case and two special cases (power and exponential loss functions) are considered. For the special cases, we also investigate the sensitivity of Bayesian point estimation and prediction to misspecification in the loss function and discuss the practical implications of the results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson, T. W. (1955). The integral of a symmetric unimodal function over a symmetric convex set and some probability inequalities,Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.,6, 170–176.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Baron, D. P. (1968). Demand Uncertainty and the Theory of the Firm, Bloomington, Indiana University, unpublished doctoral dissertation.

  3. De Groot, M. H. and Rao, M. M. (1963). Bayes estimation with convex loss,Ann. Math. Statist.,34, 839–846.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. De Groot, M. H. and Rao, M. M. (1966). Multidimensional Information Inequalities and Prediction, in P. Krishnaiah, ed.,Multivariate Analysis, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Deutsch, R. (1965).Estimation Theory, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Gould, J. P. (1969). The expected utility hypothesis and the selection of optimal deductibles for a given insurance policy,J. Bus.,42, 143–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Prediction with a generalized cost of error function,Operat. Res. Quart.,20, 199–207.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Marshall, A. W. and Olkin, I. (1968). A general approach to some screening and classification problems,J. Roy. Statist. Soc., B,30, 407–435.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Raiffa, H. and Schlaifer, R. (1961).Applied Statistical Decision Theory, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, Boston.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Savage, L. J. (1954).The Foundations of Statistics, Wiley, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Sherman, S. (1955). A theorem on Convex sets with applications,Ann. Math. Statist.,26, 763–767.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Sherman, S. (1958). Non mean-square error criteria,I.R.E. Transactions on Information Theory, IT-4, 125–126.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Tables of Normal Probability Functions (National Bureau of Standards, Applied Mathematics Series, Vol. 23), (1953), U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington.

  14. Wilde (1964).Optimum Seeking Methods, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Winkler, R. L., Roodman, G. M. and Britney, R. R. (1972). The determination of partial moments,Management Science,19, 290–296.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Statistical Association in New York, August 1968.

About this article

Cite this article

Britney, R.R., Winkler, R.L. Bayesian point estimation and prediction. Ann Inst Stat Math 26, 15–34 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02479801

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02479801

Keywords

Navigation