Skip to main content
Log in

On reinforcement and interference between stimuli

  • Published:
The bulletin of mathematical biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is shown that the current “two-factor” theory of nerve excitation can account for sustained inhibition or enhancement by a sequence of stimulus pulses, and for the decrease in the reinforcement period with each successive pulse of the train.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  • Coppée, G. 1936. “Stimulation by Alternating Current.”Cold Springs Harbor Symposium,4, 150–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, A. V. 1936. “Excitation and Accommodation in Nerve.”Proceedings of the Royal Society,119, 305–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, B., Schmitt, O. H. 1940. “Electric Interaction Between Two Adjacent Nerve Fibers.”Journal of Physiology,97, 471–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorente de No. 1938. “Analysis of the Activity of the Chains of Internuncial Neurons.”Journal of Neurophysiology,1, 207–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashevsky, N. 1940.Advance and Applications of Mathematical Biology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Young, G. On reinforcement and interference between stimuli. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 3, 5–12 (1941). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02478102

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02478102

Keywords

Navigation