Skip to main content
Log in

Rate maximizing and state variable theories of diet selection

  • Behavioural Ecology
  • Published:
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In behavioral ecology, diet selection is often predicted by using a theory in which it is assumed that behaviors have evolved to maximize the rate of intake of energy. In this theory, it is assumed that fitness is a monotonic function of energy intake. An alternative is to deal directly with fitness, measured in terms of expected reproduction, and thus connect short term behavior with reproduction. Following the usual assumptions of the theory of diet choice, fitness satisfies a partial differential-difference equation. Conditions under which rate maximizing and state variable theories of diet selection yield identical predictions are identified. When predation, as well as starvation, is a source of mortality, the identification is not as complete.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  • Feller, W. 1971.An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, Vol. 2. New York: Wiley Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilliam, J. F. 1990. Hunting by the hunted: optimal prey selection by foragers under predation hazard. InBehavioural Mechanisms of Food Selection, R. Hughes (Ed.), pp. 797–820. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godin, J-G. 1990. Diet selection under the risk of predation. InBehavioural Mechanisms of Food Selection, R. Hughes (Ed.), pp. 739–740. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R. D. 1987. Faith and foraging: A critique of the “Paradigm Argument from Design”. InForaging Behavior, A. C. Kamil, J. R. Krebs and H. R. Pulliam (Eds), pp. 69–140. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston, A. I. and J. McNamara. 1985. The choice of two prey types that minimises the probability of starvation.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 17, 135–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, R. 1990 (Ed.).Behavioural Mechanisms of Food Selection. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlin, S. and H. M. Taylor. 1975.A First Course in Stochastic Processes. New York: Academic Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C. C. and L. A. Segel 1974.Mathematics Applied to Deterministic Problems in the Natural Sciences. New York Macmillan.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig, D. and L. Rowe. 1990. Life history strategies for energy gain and predator avoidance under time constraints.Am. Nat. 135, 686–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangel, M. 1989. Evolution of host selection in parasitoids: Does the state of the parasitoid matter?Am. Nat. 133, 688–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangel, M. and C. W. Clark. 1988.Dynamic Modeling in Behavioral Ecology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, J. M. 1992. Evolutionarily stable levels of vigilance as a function of group size.Anim. Behav., in press.

  • McNamara, J. M. and A. I. Houston. 1989. State-dependent contests for food.J. theor. Biol. 137, 457–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, C. S. and M. Mangel 1990. New methods for the problem of collective ruin.SIAM J. appl. Math. 50, 1442–1456.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Pierotti, R. and C. A. Annett. 1990. Diet and reproductive output in seabirds.BioScience 40, 568–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, D. W. and J. R. Krebs. 1986.Foraging Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mangel, M. Rate maximizing and state variable theories of diet selection. Bltn Mathcal Biology 54, 413–422 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02464841

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02464841

Keywords

Navigation