Skip to main content
Log in

Primary events in odour detection

  • Published:
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An analysis of the interaction between stimulus molecules and the olfactory receptor cell membrane is presented. The model is based upon a sequence of events, i.e. stimulus delivery at the olfactory epithelium, absorption of molecules in the mucus layer, diffusion of the molecules towards the receptor cells and molecule-receptor cell membrane interaction. The mathematical analysis considers the situation during electrophysiological experiments, where an odour puff is delivered at an exposed olfactory mucosa. Such a situation resembles sniffing of odour samples. The analysis is discussed in relation to experimental evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  • Amoore, J. E. 1962. “The Stereochemical Theory of Olfaction”.Proc. Scient. Sect., Toilet Goods Ass. 37 (suppl.), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beidler, L. M. 1971. “Taste Receptor Stimulation with Salts and Acids’. InHandbook of Sensory Physiology Chemical Senses 2, Ed. L. M. Beidler, pp. 200–220. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bostock, H. 1973. “Diffusion and the Frog E. O. G.”. InTransduction Mechanisms in Chemoreception, Ed. T. M. Poynder, pp. 27–38. London: Information Retrieval Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and T. M. Poynder. 1972. “Apparatus for Delivering and Monitoring a Sequence of Odour Stimuli”.J. Physiol. Lond. 224, 14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J. T. 1965. “A Theory of the Quality of Odours”J. theor. Biol. 8, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Simone, J. A. and S. Price. 1976. “A Model for the Stimulation of Taste Receptor Cells by Salt”.Biophys. J. 16, 869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drongelen, W. van. 1978. “Unitary Recordings of Near Threshold Responses of Receptor Cells in the Olfactory Mucosa of the Frog”.J. Physiol., Lond. 277, 423–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, A. Holley and K. B. Døving, 1978. “Convergence in the Olfactory System: Quantitative Aspects of Odour Sensitivity”.J. theor. Biol. 71, 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gesteland, R. C., J. Y. Lettvin and W. H. Pitts, 1965. “Chemical Transmission in the Nose of the Frog”.J. Physiol. Lond. 182, 525–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getchell, T. V. and M. L. Getchell, 1977. “Early Events in Vertebrate Olfaction”.Chemical Senses Flavor 2, 313–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heck, G. L. and R. P. Erickson, 1973. “A Rate Theory of Gustatory Stimulation”.Behav. Biol. 8, 687–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holley, A., A. Duchamp, M. F. Revial, A. Juge and P. MacLeod 1974. “Qualitative and Quantitative Discrimination in the Frog Olfactory Receptors: Analysis from Electrophysiological Data”.Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 237, 102–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and P. MacLeod, 1977. “Transduction at Codage des Informations Olfactives chez les Vertébrés”.J. Physiol. Paris73, 725–828.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaissling, K. E. 1971. “Insect Olfaction”. InHandbook of Sensory Physiology Chemical Senses 1, Ed. L. M. Beidler, pp. 351–431. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masson, C., S. Kouprach, I. Giachetti and P. MacLeod, 1977. “Relation between Intramembranous Particle Density of Frog Olfactory Cilia and E. O. G. Response”. InOlfaction and Taste 6, Eds J. Le Magnen and P. MacLeod, p. 195. London: Information Retrieval Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menco, B. P. M. 1977. “A Qualitative and Quantitative Investigation of Olfactory and Nasal Respiratory Mucosal Surfaces of Cow and Sheep Based on Various Ultrastructural and Biochemical Methods”.Commun. Agric. Univ., Wageningen 77, 13–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottoson, D. 1956. “Analysis of the Electrical Activity of the Olfactory Epithelium”Acta Physiol. Scand. 35, suppl. 122, 1–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1971. “The Electro-Olfactogram”. InHandbook of Sensory Physiology Chemical Senses 1, Ed. L. M. Beidler, pp. 95–131. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poynder, T. M. 1973. “Self-shunting and the Frog E. O. G.”. InTransduction Mechanisms in Chemoreception, Ed. T. M. Poynder, pp. 241–250. London: Information Retrieval Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, G. E. and H. Kaufman, 1966.Table of Laplace Transforms. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Co.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Takagi, S. F., G. A. Wyse, H. Kitamura and K. Ito, 1968. “The Roles of Sodium and Potassium Ions in the Generation of the Electro-olfactogram”J. gen Physiol. 51, 552–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R. H. C. Reid and H. G. V. Evans, 1956. “Odour and Molecular Vibration. A New Theory of Olfactory Stimulation”.Chem. Ind. 37, 973–977.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Drongelen, W., Pagnotte, Y. & Hendriks, M.H. Primary events in odour detection. Bltn Mathcal Biology 44, 411–423 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02462289

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02462289

Keywords

Navigation