Abstract
In a well-known collection of his essays in cognitive psychology Miller (The Psychology of Communication. Penguin, 1974) describes in detail a number of experiments aiming at a determination of the limits (if any) of the human brain in processing information. He concludes that the ‘channel capacity’ of human subjects does not exceed a few bits or that the number of categories of (one-dimensional) stimuli from which unambiguous judgment can be made are of the order of ‘seven plus or minus two’. This ‘magic number’ holds also, Miller found, for the number of random digits a person can correctly recall on a row and also the number of sentences that can be inserted inside a sentence in a natural language and still be read through without confusion.
In this paper we propose a dynamical model of information processing by a self-organizing system which is based on the possible use of strange attractors as cognitive devices. It comes as an amusing surprise to find that such a model can, among other things, reproduce the ‘magic number seven plus-minus two’ and also its variance in a number of cases and provide a theoretical justification for them. This justification is based on the optimum length of a code which maximizes the dynamic storing capacity for the strings of digits constituting the set of external stimuli.
This provides a mechanism for the fact that the ‘human channel’, which is so narrow and so noisy (of the order of just a few bits per second or a few bits per category) possesses the ability of squeezing or ‘compressing’ practically an unlimited number of bits per symbol—thereby giving rise to a phenomenal memory.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature
Chaitin, G. 1975. “Randomness and Mathematical Proof.”Scient. Am. May, 47–59.
Farmer, J. Doyne. 1982. “Information Dimension and the Probabilistic Structure of Chaos.”Z. Naturforsch. 37, 1304.
—, E. Ott and J. A. Yorke. 1983. “The Dimension of Chaotic Attractors.”Physica 7, 153.
Matsumoto, K. 1983. “Noise-induced Order II.”J. stat. Phys. (to appear).
— and I. Tsuda. 1983. “Noise-induced Order.”J. stat. Phys. 31, 87.
Miller, G. A. 1974.The Psychology of Communication. Harmondsworth, U.K.: Penguin.
Nicolis, J. S. 1982a. “Sketch for a Dynamical Theory of Language.”Kybernetes 11, 123–132.
—. 1982b. “Should a Reliable Information Processor be Chaotic.”Kybernetes 11, 269–274.
— 1984. “The Role of Chaos in Reliable Information Processing.”J. Franklin Inst. 317, 289–307. Also inSynergetics, Ed. H. Haken. Proc. Elmau Conference 1–8 May. Berlin: Springer.
— 1985.Dynamics of Hierarchical Systems. An Evolutionary Approach, Ed. H. Haken. Berlin, Springer.
— and M. Benrubi. 1976. “A Model on the Role of Noise at the Neuronal and Cognitive Levels.”J. theor. Biol. 59, 77.
—, G. Mayer-Kress and G. Haubs. 1983. “Non-uniform Chaotic Dynamics with Implications to Information Processing.”Z. Naturforsch. 36, 1157–1169.
—, E. Protonotarios and H. Lianos. 1975. “Some Views on the Role of Noise in Self-organizing Systems.”Biol. Cybernet. 17, 183.
Rapoport, A. 1956. “The Promise and Pitfalls of Information Theory.”Behavl Sci. 1, 303–315.
Roux, J. C. 1983. “Experimental Studies of Bifurcations Leading to Chaos in the Belousov-Zhabotinsky Reaction.”Physica 7, 57.
—, R. H. Simoui and H. L. Swinney. 1983. “Observation of a Strange Attractor.”Physica 8, 257.
Shaw, R. 1981. “Strange Attractors, Chaotic Behavior and Information Flow.”Z. Naturforsch. 36, 80–112.
Tsuda, I. and K. Matsumoto. 1983. “Noise-induced Order—Complexity Theoretical Digression.” InSynergetics Series—Chaos and Statistical Mechanics, Ed. Y. Kuramoto. Berlin: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nicolis, J.S., Tsuda, I. Chaotic dynamics of information processing: The “magic number seven plus-minus two” revisited. Bltn Mathcal Biology 47, 343–365 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02459921
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02459921