Skip to main content
Log in

In vivo determination of young's modulus for the human cornea

  • Published:
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present paper describes a calculation technique to determine a value of Young's modulus for the cornea when the intraocular pressure, the shape of the cornea and the thickness variation along the cornea are known fromin vivo measurements. Twenty-eight persons were examined in both eyes and a mean value of Young's modulus for the cornea was calculated to 2.45×104±0.57×104 N/m2 (S.D.).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  • Andreassen, T. T., A. H. Simonsen and H. Oxlund. 1980. “Biomechanical Properties of Keratoconus and Normal Corneas.”Expl Eye Res. 31, 435–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battaglioli, J. L. and R. D. Kamm. 1984. “Measurements of the Comprehensive Properties of Scleral Tissue.”Inv. Ophthal. vis. Sci. 25, 59–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borcherdinging, M. S., L. J. Blacik, R. A. Stittig, J. W. Bizzell, M. Breen and H. G. Weinstein. 1975. “Proteoglycans and Collagen Fibre Organization in Human Corneoscleral Tissue.”Expl Eye Res. 21, 59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruggemann 1968.Conic Mirrors, pp. 21–29. London: Focal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmund, C. 1987. “Determination of the Corneal Thickness Profile.” To be published.

  • Eliason, J. and D. Maurice. 1981. “Stress Distribution Across thein Vivo Human Cornea.”Inv. Ophthal. vis. Sci. (Suppl. Arvo) p. 156.

  • Fung, Y.-C. B. (1972). “Stress-Strain-History Relations of Soft Tissues in Simple Elongation.” InBiomechanics, Its Foundation and Objectives, Y.-C. B.Fung, N. Perrone and M. Anliker (Eds), pp. 181–208. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, P. R. and T. A. McMahon. 1979. “Scleral Creep vs Temperature and Pressurein Vitro.”Expl Eye Res. 29, 527–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandell, R. B. and R. St. Helen. 1971. “Mathematical Model of the Corneal Contour.”Br. J. physiol. Opt. 26, 183–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, I. S., P. R. Greene and C. S. Foster. 1982. “Comparison of Mechanical Properties of Keratoconus and Normal Corneas.”Expl Eye Res. 35, 413–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyquist, G. W. 1968. “Reology of the Cornea: Experimental Techniques and Results.”Expl Eye Res. 7, 183–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, N. J., R. S. Mackay and J. L. Sackman. 1966. “A Theoretical and Experimental Study of the Mechanical Behaviour of the Cornea with Application to the Measurement of the Intraocular Pressure.”Bull. math. Biol. 28, 585–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjøntoft, E. 1983. “Deconvolution When Only the Lower Order Moments of the Convolution Function are Known.”Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. 206, 199–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsley, M. 1970. “New Knowledge of the Corneal Contour.”Contacto 14, 38–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woo, S., A. S. Kobayashi, W. A. Schlegel and C. Lawrence. 1972. “Nonlinear Material Properties of Intact Cornea and Sclera.”Expl Eye Res. 14, 29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sjøntoft, E., Edmund, C. In vivo determination of young's modulus for the human cornea. Bltn Mathcal Biology 49, 217–232 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02459699

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02459699

Keywords

Navigation