Skip to main content
Log in

Cancer chemotherapy: Optimal control using the Verhulst-Pearl equation

  • Published:
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

General (deterministic) ordinary differential equations for the representation of cancer growth are presented when the growth is perturbed due to the action of a chemotherapeutic agent. The Verhulst-Pearl equation is introduced as a particular example of a growth equation applicable to human tumors. An optimal control problem with general performance criterion and state equation is formulated and shown to possess a novel feedback control relationship. This relationship is used in two continuous drug delivery problems involving the Verhulst-Pearl equation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  • Athans, M. and P. L. Falb. 1966.Optimal Control. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bahrami, K. and M. Kim. 1975. “Optimal Control of Multiplicative Control Systems Arising from Cancer Chemotherapy.”IEEE Trans. Aut. Control AC-20, 537–542.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Buckles, R. G. 1978. “New Horizons in Drug Delivery.”CA-Cancer Jl Clin. 28, 343–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. M., A. Greenfield and W. C. Wood. 1983. “Treatment of Hepatic Artery Chemotherapy Using an Implanted Drug Pump.”Cancer 51, 2013–2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denekamp, J. 1982.Cell Kinetics and Cancer Therapy. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorr, R. T., C. E. Trinca, K. Griffith, P. L. Dombrowsky and S. E. Salmon. 1979. “Limitations of a Portable Infusion Pump in Ambulatory Patients Receiving Continuous Infusions of Anti-cancer Drugs.”Cancer Treatment. Rep. 63, 211–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Himmelstein, K. J. and K. B. Bischoff. 1973a. “Mathematical Representations of Cancer Chemotherapy Effects.”J. Pharmacokinet. Biopharm. 1, 51–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and —. 1973b. “Models of ARA-C Chemotherapy of L1210 Leukemia in Mice.”J. Pharmacokinet. Biopharm. 1, 69–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hokanson, J. A., B. W. Brown, J. R. Thompson, B. Drewinko and R. Alexanian. 1977. “Tumor Growth Patterns in Multiple Myeloma.”Cancer 39, 1077–1084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malaise, E. and M. Tubiana. 1966. “Croissance des Cellules d’un Fibrosarcome Expérimental Irradié Chez la Souris C 3 H.”C. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris 263D, 292–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinstry, D. W. 1981. “Implanted Drug Delivery System for Regional Cancer Chemotherapy.”Res. Resources Reporter V, 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearl, R. 1924.Studies in Human Biology. New York: Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashevsky, M. 1945. “Outline of a Mathematical Approach to the Cancer Problem.”Bull. math. Biophys. 7, 69–81.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — 1948.Mathematical Biophysics. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, K. V., B. Levin, R. C. Karl, J. Faintuch, R. A. DuBrow, M. Hagle, R. M. Cooper, J. Beschorner and D. Stablein. 1985. “Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer with Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy Using a Subcutaneous Implanted Pump.”J. clin. Oncol. 3, 161–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skipper, H. E., F. M. Schabel Jr. and W. S. Wilcox. 1964. “Experimental Evaluation of Potential Anti-cancer Agents. XIII. On the Criteria and Kinetics Associated with ‘Curability» of Experimental Leukemia.”Cancer Chemother. Rep. 35, 1–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel, G. G. 1977.Growth Kinetics of Tumours. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, G. W. 1975. “Some Strategies for Harvesting a Single Species.”Bull. math. Biol. 37, 659–673.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — 1977.Some Current Mathematical Topics in Cancer Research. Published for the Society for Mathematical Biology. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms International.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1980. “Optimal Control in Some Cancer Chemotherapy Problems.”Int. J. Syst. Sci. 11, 223–237.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — 1981a.Optimization of Human Cancer Radiotherapy. New York: Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • — 1981b. “Optimal Control Applications in Biomedical Engineering—A Survey.”Opt. Control Appl. Meth. 2, 311–334.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — 1982. “An Optimal Control Model of Diabetes Mellitus.”Bull. math. Biol. 44, 793–808.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — 1984.Applications of Optimal Control Theory in Biomedicine. New York: Marcel Dekker.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • — 1985. “Optimal Control Applications in the Chemotherapy of Multiple Myeloma.”IMA Jl Math. Appl. Med. Biol. 2, 139–160.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Swan, G. W. 1986a. “Optimal Control in Chemotherapy”.Biomed. Measure. Inform. Control (to appear).

  • — 1986b. “Tumor Growth Models and Cancer Chemotherapy. InCancer Modeling, J. R. Thompson and B. N. Brown (Eds), Chap. 9 New York: Marcel Dekker (to appear).

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, G. W. 1986c. “On a Class of Optimal Control Problems in Cancer Chemotherapy.”Opt. Control. Appl. Meth. (submitted).

  • — and T. L. Vincent. 1977. “Optimal Control Analysis in the Chemotherapy of IgG Multiple Myeloma.”Bull. math. Biol. 39, 317–337.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Vaidya, V. G. and F. J. Alexandro Jr. 1982. “Evaluation of Some Mathematical Models for Tumor Growth.”Int. J. Bio-Med. Comput. 13, 19–35.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Verhagen, A. M. W. 1960. “Growth Curves and their Functional Form.”Aust. J. Stat. 2, 122–127.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Verhulst, P. F. 1838.Correspondencè Mathématique et Physique 10. Reprinted inReadings in Ecology (1965), E. J. Kormondy (Ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zietz, S. and C. Nicolini. 1979. “Mathematical Approaches to Optimization of Cancer Chemotherapy.”Bull. math. Biol. 41, 305–324.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Swan, G.W. Cancer chemotherapy: Optimal control using the Verhulst-Pearl equation. Bltn Mathcal Biology 48, 381–404 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02459688

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02459688

Keywords

Navigation