Skip to main content
Log in

Foraging costs as a defining factor for growth and asymptotic mass

  • Published:
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Modeling the growth of animals as parts of ecosystems often presumes the existence of an asymptotic weight which, when reached by the individual, stops its further growth. We show that the asymptotic weight is influenced by environmental conditions, and that growth is limited because of a trade-off of foraging costs and gain of feeding. We show that the so-called asymptotic mass is a comprehensive value, which also contains an environmental parameter. We develop our model for organisms of neutral buoyancy in an aquatic environment; for terrestrial and aerial animals it has limited validity only. We discuss examples and derive a critical value for resource availability in a habitat, which informs us whether foraging in that habitat is worthwhile or not.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bertalanffy, L. v. 1934. Untersuchungen über die Gesetzlichkeit des Wachstums. 1. Teil. Allgemeine Grundlagen der Theorie; mathematische und physiologische Gesetzlichkeiten des Wachstums bei Wassertieren.Arch. Entwicklungsmech. 131, 613–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brett, J. R. 1964. The respiratory metabolism and swimming performance of young sockeye salmon.Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 21, 1183–1226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damuth, J. 1981. Population density and body size in mammals.Nature 290, 699–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, J. M. 1979. Energetics of teleosts. InSymposia of the Zoological Society of London, P. J. Miller (Ed.), Vol. 44. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabrielli, G. and Th. von Karman. 1950. What price speed?.Mech. Eng. 72, 775–781.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, F. B. 1989.Ornithology, New York: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenewalt, C. H. 1975. The flight of birds.Trans. Amer. Philos. Soc. 65, part 4, 1–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickmann, C. P., L. S. Roberts and A. Larson. 1993.Integrated Principles of Zoology. St. Louis. Mosby.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. R. and D. J. Randall. 1978. The respiratory and circulatory systems during exercise.Fish Physiology 7, 425–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonson, L. 1992.Die Vögel Europas und des Mittelmeerraumes. Stuttgart: Kosmos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, J. R., J. T. Erichsen, M. I. Weber, and E. L. Charnov. 1977. Optimal prey selection in the Great Tit (Parus major).Animal Behavior 25, 30–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasiewski, R. C. and W. R. Dawson. 1976. A re-examination of the relation between standard metabolic rate and body weight in birds.The Condor 69, 13–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, T. A. and J. Tyler Bonner. 1983.On Size and Life. New York: Scientific American Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nachtigall, W. 1985.Warum die Vögel fliegen. Hamburg: Rasch und Roehrig Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norberg, U. M. 1990.Vertebrate Flight. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauly, D. 1986. A simple method for estimating the food consumption of fish populations from growth data and food conversion experiments.US Fish. Bull. 84, 827–842.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, M. J. 1989.The Allometry of Growth and Reproduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tait, R. V. 1981.Elements of Marine Ecology. London: Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temming, A. 1994. Food conversion efficiency and the von Bertalanffy growth function I: a modification of Pauly's model.Naga, the Iclarm Quarterly 17, 38–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, V. A. 1970. Energetic cost of locomotion in animals.Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 34, 841–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Videler, J. J. and B. A. Nolet. 1990. Costs of swimming measured at optimum speed: scale effects, differences between swimming styles, taxonomic groups and submerged and surface swimming.Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 97A, 91–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, P. W. 1971. The swimming energetics of trout II. Oxygen consumption and swimming efficiency.J. Exp. Biol. 55, 489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weihs, D. 1973. Optimal fish swimming speed.Nature 245, 48–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weihs, D. 1975. An optimum swimming speed of fish based on feeding efficiency.Israel J. Technol. 13, 163–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weihs, D. 1977. Effects of size on sustained swimming speeds of aquatic organisms. InScale Effects in Animal Locomotion. T. J. Pedley (Ed). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weis-Fogh, T. 1952. Weight economy of flying insects. InTransactions of the Ninth International Congress on Entomology Vol. 1, pp. 341–347. Excelsior.

  • Werner, E. and A. Bradley. 1993. Ecological consequences of the trade-off between growth and mortality rates mediated by foraging activity.The American Naturalist 142, 242–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stöcker, S., Weihs, D. Foraging costs as a defining factor for growth and asymptotic mass. Bltn Mathcal Biology 58, 739–751 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02459480

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02459480

Keywords

Navigation