Abstract
The effect of adding density-dependent migration between nearest neighbour populations of a single discrete-generation species in a chain of habitat fragments is investigated. The larger the population on a particular habitat fragment, the greater the fraction of inhabitants who migrate before reproducing. It has previously been shown for similar models with density-independent migration that coupling populations in this way has no effect on the stability of these populations. Here, it is demonstrated that this effect is also generally true if migration is density-dependent. However, if the migration rate is large enough and has density dependence of the correct form, then the steady state (with all the populations remaining at the same constant value through time) can be destabilised. The conditions for this to occur are obtained analytically. When this “destabilisation” occurs, the system settles down to an alternative steady state where half of the populations take one constant value which is below that of an equivalent isolated system, and the other populations all share a population value which is greater than the steady state of the isolated populations. Once this configuration is reached, the population size on each patch remains constant over time. hence the change might more properly be described as a decrease in homogeneity rather than in stability.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bascompte, J. and R. V. Solé. 1994. Spatially induced bifurcations in single-species population dynamics.J. Anim. Ecol. 63, 256–264.
Bascompte, J. and R. V. Solé. 1995a. Rethinking complexity: modelling spatiotemporal dynamics in ecology.Trends Ecol. Evol. 10, 361–365.
Bascompte, J. and R. V. Solé. 1995b. Appropriate formulations for dispersal in spatially structured models: reply.J. Anim. Ecol. 64, 665–666.
Csilling, A., I. M. Janosi, G. Pasztor and I. Scheuring. 1994. Absence of chaos in a self-organised critical coupled map lattice.Phys. Rev. E 50, 1083–1092.
Doebeli, M. 1995. Dispersal and dynamics.Theoret. Population Biol. 47, 82–106.
Gilpin, M. and I. Hanski. 1991.Metapopulation Dynamics: Empirical and Theoretical Investigations. London: Academic Press.
González-Andújar, J. L. and J. N. Perry. 1993a. The effect of dispersal between chaotic and non-chaotic populations within a metapopulation.Oikos 66, 555–557.
González-Andújar, J. L. and J. N. Perry. 1993b. Chaos, metapopulations and dispersal.Ecological Modelling 65, 255–263.
Gyllenberg, M., S. Gunnar and S. Ericsson. 1993. Does migration stabilize population dynamics? Analysis of a discrete metapopulation model.Math. Biosci. 118, 25–49.
Hassell, M. P.. 1975. Density-dependence in single-species populations.J. Anim. Ecol. 44, 283–295.
Hassell, M. P., J. H. Lawton and R. M. May. 1976. Patterns of dynamical behaviour in single species populations.J. Anim. Ecol. 45, 471–489.
Hassell, M. P., H. N. Comins and R. M. May. 1991. Spatial structure and chaos in insect population dynamics.Nature 353, 255–258.
Hassell, M. P., H. N. Comins and R. M. May. 1994. Species coexistence and self-organising spatial dynamics.Nature 370, 290–292.
Hassell, M. P., O. Miramontes, P. Rohani and R. M. May. 1995. Appropriate formulations for dispersal in spatially structured models: reply to Bascompte and Solé.J. Anim. Ecol. 64, 662–664.
Hastings, A. 1993. Complex interactions between dispersal and dynamics: lessons from coupled logistic equations.Ecology 74, 1362–1372.
Hastings, A. and K. Higgins. 1995. Chaos and scale.Trends Evol. Ecol. 10, 335.
Lloyd, A. L.. 1995. The coupled logistic map: a simple model for the effects of spatial heterogeneity on population dynamics.J. Theor. Biol. 173, 217–230.
May, R. M.. 1973.Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Murray, J. D.. 1989.Mathematical Biology. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Neubert, M. G., M. Kot and M. A. Lewis. 1995. Dispersal and pattern formation in a discrete-time predator-prey model.Theoret. Population Biol. 48, 7–43.
Nisbet, R. M. and W. S. C. Gurney. 1982.Modelling Fluctuating Populations. Chichester: Wiley.
Okubo, A. 1980.Diffusion and Ecological Problems: Mathematical Models, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Paradis, E. 1995. Chaos and scale.Trends. Ecol. Evol. 10, 335.
Pascual, M.. 1993. Diffusion-induced chaos in a spatial predator-prey system.Proc. Roy. Soc. London Ser B 251, 1–7.
Reeve, J. D.. 1988. Environmental variability, migration and persistence in host-parasitoid systems.Am. Nat. 132, 810–836.
Renshaw, E.. 1991.Modelling Biological Populations in Space and Time, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rohani, P., R. M. May and M. P. Hassell. 1996. Metapopulations and local stability: the effects of spaaial structure.J. Theor. Biol., in press.
Ruxton, G. D.. 1995. Chaos and scale.Trends Ecol. Evol. 10, 335–336.
Ruxton, G. D. 1996. Dispersal and chaos in spatially structured models: an individual-level approach.J. Anim. Ecol., in press.
Taylor, A. D.. 1990. Metapopulations, dispersal and predator-prey dynamics: an overview.Ecology 71, 429–443.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ruxton, G.D. Density-dependent migration and stability in a system of linked populations. Bltn Mathcal Biology 58, 643–660 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02459477
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02459477