Skip to main content
Log in

Computational experience with an algorithm for tetrangle inequality bound smoothing

  • Published:
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An important component of computer programs for determining the solution conformation of proteins and other flexible molecules from nuclear magnetic resonance data are the so-called “bound smoothing algorithms”, which compute lower and upper limits on the values of all the interatomic distances from the relatively sparse set which can usually be measured experimentally. To date, the only methods efficient enough for use in large problems take account of only the triangle inequality, but an appreciable improvement in the precision of the limits is possible if the algebraic relations between the distances among each quadruple of atoms are also considered. The goal of this paper is to use a recently improved algorithm for computing these “tetrangle inequality limits” to determine just how much improvement really is possible, given the types of experimental data that are usually available.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  • Billeter, M., W. Braun and K. Wüthrich. 1982. “Sequential Resonance Assignments in Protein1H Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectra.”J. Molec. Biol. 155, 321–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumenthal, L. M. 1970.Theory and Applications of Distance Geometry. New York: Chelsea.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, W. 1987. “Distance Geometry and Related Methods for Protein Structure Determination from NMR Data.”Quart. Rev. Biophys. 19, 115–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crippen, G. M. and T. F. Havel. 1988.Distance Geometry and Molecular Conformation. Chemometrics Research Studies Press in press.

  • Dress, A. W. M. and T. F. Havel. 1988. “Shortest Path Problems and Molecular Conformation.”Discrete Appl. Math. 19, 129–144.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Havel, T. F., I. D. Kuntz and G. M. Crippen. 1983. “The Theory and Practice of Distance Geometry.”Bull. Math. Biol. 45, 665–720.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — and K. Wüthrich. 1984. “A Distance Geometry Program for Determining the Structures of Small Proteins and other Macromolecules from Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Measurements of1H−1H Proximities in Solution.”Bull. Math. Biol. 46, 281–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabsch, W. and C. Sander. 1983. “Dictionary of Protein Structure: Pattern Recognition by Hydrogen-bonded and Geometrical Features.”Biopolymers 22, 2577–2637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wüthrich, K., M. Billeter and W. Braun. 1983. “Pseudostructures for the 20 Common Amino Acids for Use in Studies of Protein Conformations by Measurements of Intramolecular Proton-Proton Distance Constraints with Nuclear Magnetic Resonance”.J. Molec. Biol. 169, 949–961.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1986.NMR of Proteins and Nucleic Acids. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Easthope, P.L., Havel, T.F. Computational experience with an algorithm for tetrangle inequality bound smoothing. Bltn Mathcal Biology 51, 173–194 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458843

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458843

Keywords

Navigation