Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring S&T activities in the Former Socialist Economies of Central and Eastern Europe: Conceptual and methodological issues in linking past with present

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The economic and social transformation of countries of central and eastern Europe has deeply affected their S&T systems. However, conceptual and methodological problems in monitoring transformation of their S&T systems are not trivial. In this paper we analyse conceptual and methodological issues involved in measuring S&T activities in the socialist and post-socialist period across the most important S&T indicators (R&D, US and national patents; innovation surveys; bibliometrics). Our conclusions are that: i) the process of methodological harmonisation of S&T indicators has progressed considerably and we have provided some evidence in that respect; ii) the use of similar or identical indicators (business R&D, innovation counts, patents, citations) when making inter-country or inter-temporal comparisons should be approached with caution because of the significant differences between the socialist and post-socialist periods as well as between post-socialist R&D systems and R&D in other market economies. This latter applies especially to the interpretation of business R&D data in the post-socialist period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Amman, R., J. Cooper, R. W. Davies (Eds),The Technological Level of Soviet Industry, Yale University Press, New Haven and London.

  • Auriol, L. (1997). Developments in university research of Central and Eastern European countries since 1990: Statistical analysis, Research at Central and East European Universities,Conference Proceedings, Jagiellonian University Press Krakow, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auriol, L., S. Radosevic (1996), S&T Indicators in Central and Eastern Europe: Conceptual and Methodological Issues, Conference on the Implementation of OECD Methodologies for R&D/S&T Statistics in Central and Eastern European Countries, Room document no. 15, OMFB/OECD, Budapest, 6.–8. November 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baev, A. (1997), Protection of Intellectual Property Rights in Russia, in: Bernstein, D. (Ed.),Cooperative Business Ventures between U.S. companies and Russian Defense Enterprises, Center for International Security and Arms Control Institute for International Studies, Stanford University.

  • Berdashkevich, A. P. (1996), A Review of Intellectual Property Laws in Russia, In OECD,S&T Legislation in Russia, OECD, Paris,

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, T., W. Glänzel (1996), International collaboration: will it be keeping alive East European research?Scientometrics, 36 (1996) 247–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council for Mutual Economic Assistance (1974),Main Indicators of the Volume and structure of Research and Experimental and Designing Activities of the CMEA Countries, CMEA: Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council for Mutual Economic Assistance (1980),Statistics on Science—Basic Methodological Concepts on Statistics, Vol. II, pp. 356–383, CMEA: Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for Science Research and Statistics (1995),Science and Technology in Russia 1994, CSRS: Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for Science Research and Statistics (1996),Innovaciji v otraslah promishljenosti, CSRS: Moskva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. (1967), A comment on Expenditures on R&D in Poland,Minerva, Vol. 5, No. 3, 371–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gokhberg, L., I. Kuznetsova (1996), The Russian Innovation Survey: Methodology and First Results. Paper presented at the Conference on the Implementation of OECD Methodologies for R&D/S&T Statistics in Central and Eastern European Countries, Room document no. 15, OMFB/OECD, Budapest, 6.–8. November.

  • Gorodnikova (1995), Statistics of R&D in Russia (Data and methodological issues). Background paper for the project on “Russian Applied R&D: Its present State and Future Promise”, IIASA: Laxenbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haveman, F. (1994),Changing Publication Behaviour of Eastern European Scientists and the Impact of their Papers, Humboldt University and Association for Science Studies, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inzelt, A. (1995), Review of recent developments in S&T in Hungary: Developments in Hungary's S&T sector since 1991: a summary, OECD, CCET/DSTI (95) 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keereva, D. N., S. A. Rozhkov, S. B. Shaposhnik (1993), The Impact of Soviet Publications on the Development of World Science: Analysis of Bibliometric Indicators, Studies on Russian Economic Development, Official English Translation ofProblemy Prognozirovaniya, Vol. 4, No. 1, February, 32–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luukkonen, T., R. J. Tijssen, O. Persson, G. Sivertsen (1993), The measurement of international scientific collaboration,Scientometrics, 28 (1993) 15–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meske, W. (1993), The restructuring of the East German research system—a provisional appraisal,Science and Public Policy, Vol. 20, No. 5, p. 298–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagesh, K. (1993), Foreign direct investments and technology licensing: trends, patterns and determinants. Paper prepared for the UNIDO expert meeting on technology transfer, UNIDO, Vienna, 11–14. October.

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (1963),Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys of Research and Development, Directorate for Scientific Affairs, DAS/PD/62.47, OECD: Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (1965),The Research and Development Effort in Western Europe, North America and the Soviet Union, Prepared byC. Freeman and A.Young, OECD: Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (1990),Proposed Standard Method of Compiling and Interpreting Technology Balance of Payments Data: TBP Manual 1990, The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities Series, OECD: Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (1992),OECD Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data—Oslo Manual, OCDE/GD (92) 26, Paris.

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (1994a),Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys of Research and Experimental Development—Frascati Manual, The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities Series, OECD: Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (1994b)Using Patent Data as Science and Technology Indicators—Patent Manual 1994, The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities Series, OCDE/GD (94) 114, Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (1995),Manual on the Measurement of Human Resources Devoted to S&T—Canberra Manual, The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities Series, Eurostat/OECD, OCDE/GD (95) 77, Paris.

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (1996),Science and Technology Statistics in the Partners in Transition Countries and the Russian Federation, CCET Series, OCDE/GD (96) 56, Paris.

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (1997),S&T Statistical Systems in Central and Eastern European Countries: 1996 National Profiles, Conference on implementation of OECD methodologies for R&D/S&T statistics in Central and Eastern European countries, OECD, CCET/DSTI/EAS (97) 48/ANNI, Paris.

  • Radosevic, S., L. Auriol (1996), R&D and innovation activities in Central and Eastern European countries: analysis based on S&T indicators, Paper presented at the Conference on the Implementation of OECD Methodologies for R&D/S&T Statistics in Central and Eastern European Countries, Room document no. 15, OMFB/OECD, Budapest, 6.–8. November 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radosevic, S., Dj. Kutlača (1997),Assessing the Basis for ‘Catching-up’ of Eastern Europe: an Analysis Based on U.S. Foreign Patenting Data, Brighton: Science Policy Research Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Science Watch (1991), No Slippage Yet Seen in Strength of US Science, Institute for Scientific Information,Science Watch, January/February, pp. 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, A., T. Braun (1990), International collaboration in the sciences, 1981–85,Scientometrics, 19 (1990) 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siebeck, W. W. (Ed.) (1990), Strengthening Protection of Intellectual Property in Developing Countries: A Survey of Literature,World Bank Discussion Paper No. 112, World Bank, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • SV-Wissenschaftsstatistik (1990),Forschung und Entwicklung in der DDR. Daten zur Wissenschaftsstatistik 1971–1989, Essen.

  • United Nations Center for Transnational Corporations (1988),Transnational Corporations in World Development: Trends and Prospects, New York: UNCTNCs.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (1978), Recommendation Concerning the International Standardisation of Statistics on Science and Technology, UNESCO: Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (1984), Manual for Statistics on Scientific and Technological Activities, ST-84/WS/12, UNESCO: Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickery, G. (1986), International Flows of Technology—Recent Trends and Development,STI Review, Vol. 1 (Autumn), Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Radosevic, S., Auriol, L. Measuring S&T activities in the Former Socialist Economies of Central and Eastern Europe: Conceptual and methodological issues in linking past with present. Scientometrics 42, 273–297 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458372

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458372

Keywords

Navigation