Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative sensitivity analysis of stable stage structures and reproductive values

  • Published:
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

New formulas for deriving the sensitivities of stable stage structures and reproductive values to changes in vital rates are presented. They enable comparison of the sensities to changes of different elements in the projection matrix; in other words, comparison of partial derivatives of the eigenvectors. These kinds of sensitivities can be used in applied problems such as an analysis of the effect of harvesting on the population structure. However, in this paper, we examine the application of the sensitivities in a more general ecological context. We investigate why the stable stage structure of the mustard aphid,Lipaphis erysimi, changes very little in the temperature interval 10–30°C. The sensitivities of the stable stage structure at 15°C and 25°C were derived. The character of the sensitivites were the same in both temperatures although the stage structure was more sensitive to changes at 15°C than at 25°C. The sensitivity analysis also revealed that the temperature variation results in changes in fecundity and developmental rate that have a counteractive effect on the population structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  • Bellman, R. 1970.Introduction to Matrix Analysis, pp. 288. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caswell, H. 1978. A general formula for the sensitivity of population growth rate to changes in life history parameters.Theor. Pop. Biol. 14, 215–232.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Caswell, H. 1980. On the equivalence of maximizing reproductive value maximizing fitness.Ecology 61, 19–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caswell, H. 1988. Approaching size and age in matrix population models. InSize-structured Populations. B. Ebenman and L. Persson, pp. 85–105. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caswell, H. 1989.Matrix Population Models. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desoer, C. A. 1967. Perturbations of eigen values and eigenvectors of a network, pp. 8–11.Fifth Annual Allerton Conference on Circuit and System Theory. University of Illinois, Urbana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getz, W. M. 1979. Optimal harvesting of structural populations.Math. Biosci. 44, 269–292.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Getz, W. M. and R. G. Haight. 1989.Population Harvesting. Demographic Models of Fish, Forest, and Animal Resources. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrand F. B. 1965.Methods of Applied Mathematics, pp. 76–77. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landin, J. and U. Wennergren. 1987. Temperature effects on population growth of mustard aphids.Swed. J. Agri. Res. 17, 13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanSickle, J. 1977. Analysis of a distributed-parameter population model based on physiological age.J. theor. Biol. 64, 571–586.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wennergren, U. and J. Landin. 1993. Population growth and structure in a variable environment. I. Aphids and temperature variation.Oecologia 93, 394–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wennergren, U., Weinerfelt, P. & Forsling, G. Comparative sensitivity analysis of stable stage structures and reproductive values. Bltn Mathcal Biology 56, 945–957 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458275

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458275

Keywords

Navigation